Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Protected area / relocation · Tanzania · 2017–2025

World Bank REGROW project, Ruaha National Park

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
People
  • At least 12 people died. not independently verified
    Oakland Institute allegation of killings or disappearances; Witness Radio reports 11 killed and 5 disappeared. No official finding.
What the record lacks: 3 none on record · 5 insufficient · 1 not measured · 2 disputed See the gaps

A US$150 million World Bank project in southern Tanzania was suspended in April 2024 after allegations of ranger violence and village removals around Ruaha National Park. The Bank's Inspection Panel found non-compliance with Bank policies, and the government cancelled the project in November 2024.

US$150 millionWorld Bank project value approved 28 September 2017
Reported disbursements before suspension: US$100–132 million (figures differ between reports).

Status As of October 2026 (latest research date): project cancelled in November 2024; the latest recorded step is the Bank Board's approval of a Management Action Plan on 1 April 2025; no prosecutions found.

What?
A World Bank-financed US$150 million project in southern Tanzania was suspended and then cancelled after allegations of ranger violence and village removals around Ruaha National Park; the Bank's Inspection Panel found non-compliance with Bank policies. World Bank Inspection Panel
Where?
Ruaha National Park, southern Tanzania.
When?
Approved 28 September 2017; suspended 18 April 2024; Panel report 16 September 2024; cancelled November 2024; Management Action Plan approved 1 April 2025. World Bank Inspection Panel
Who?
Gained
  • TANAPA — Named, with the REGROW budget, among the parties that gained in the sources reviewed; the sources do not itemise amounts.
Lost
  • World Bank — Disbursements suspended on 18 April 2024 and the project cancelled in November 2024.
Harmed
  • Residents of villages around Ruaha National Park — Alleged killings and disappearances (at least 12 per the Oakland Institute); removal of five villages (21,252 people) announced in 2022; more than 84,000 people in 28 villages reported at risk.
  • Park rangers — TANAPA reported 50 rangers killed nationwide in 2018–2024. World Bank Inspection Panel
Why?
The project was described as a tourism project that overlapped with the expansion of Ruaha National Park; removal of five villages was announced in 2022.
How?
Per the Inspection Panel, the ranger code of conduct deferred to rules that “clearly allows the use of excessive force”, and management did not require incident reporting from TANAPA. World Bank Inspection Panel
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

The World Bank approved a US$150 million project known as REGROW on 28 September 2017. the sources reviewed describe it as a tourism project in southern Tanzania that overlapped with the expansion of Ruaha National Park, reported to have grown from about one million hectares to more than two million. REGROW concerns Ruaha National Park, not Ngorongoro.

In 2022 five villages, with 21,252 residents, were announced for removal. A summary of reports says that in April 2021 a fisherman and two others, one of them aged 14, were reported killed by rangers. The same summary says the Bank first said its mandate did not extend to government institutions; after a complaint from affected communities the Bank's Inspection Panel took up the case.

Disbursements were suspended with effect from 18 April 2024. The Inspection Panel's investigation report of 16 September 2024 found that the project's ranger code of conduct deferred to rules that “clearly allows the use of excessive force”. Bank management conceded that the project “had increased the possibility of violent confrontations”, and the Panel found that management “remained unaware of serious incidents” because it had not required incident reporting from the national parks agency, TANAPA. The Panel found non-compliance with Bank policies OP 4.01, OP 4.12 and the IPF policy.

The Tanzanian government cancelled the project in November 2024; one record describes the closure as made at the government's request. Reported disbursements before suspension were between US$100 million and US$132 million. The Bank's Board approved a Management Action Plan on 1 April 2025.

The Oakland Institute alleges at least 12 killings or disappearances connected to the Ruaha area, and Witness Radio reports 11 people killed and 5 disappeared; neither figure rests on an official finding in the sources. TANAPA reported to the Panel that 50 rangers were killed nationwide in 2018–2024. A summary of reports says that more than 84,000 people in 28 villages remain at risk.

  1. 2017World Bank approves the US$150 million REGROW project (28 Sep)
  2. 2021Three people, one aged 14, reported killed by rangers (April)
  3. 2022Removal of five villages (21,252 people) announced
  4. 2024Disbursements suspended (18 Apr); Inspection Panel report (16 Sep); government cancels the project (Nov)
  5. 2025Bank Board approves a Management Action Plan (1 Apr)

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

“clearly allows the use of excessive force”

World Bank Inspection Panel, on the rules to which the project's ranger code of conduct defers · 16 September 2024 · World Bank Inspection Panel

“had increased the possibility of violent confrontations”

“remained unaware of serious incidents”

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Did the project and its ranger rules contribute to violence and killings around Ruaha?
International bodies
World Bank Inspection Panel

Found that the ranger code of conduct defers to rules that “clearly allows the use of excessive force” and found non-compliance with OP 4.01, OP 4.12 and the IPF policy (16 Sep 2024).

World Bank Inspection Panel
International bodies
World Bank management

Conceded the project “had increased the possibility of violent confrontations”; the Panel found it “remained unaware of serious incidents”.

World Bank Inspection Panel
Communities and civil society
Oakland Institute

Alleges at least 12 killings or disappearances.

Communities and civil society
Witness Radio

Reports 11 killed and 5 disappeared.

Government and regulators
TANAPA

Reported that 50 rangers were killed nationwide in 2018–2024.

World Bank Inspection Panel
Did the Bank's mandate cover the conduct of government agencies?
International bodies
World Bank

Said at first, as reported, that its authority did not cover government institutions.

International bodies
World Bank Inspection Panel

Took up the case after a community complaint and found non-compliance with Bank policies.

World Bank Inspection Panel

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

    Recorded

    • The ranger code of conduct defers to rules that “clearly allows the use of excessive force”.
    • Rules of engagement allow shooting fleeing offenders “in certain circumstances”.
    • Bank management did not require TANAPA to report incidents and “remained unaware of serious incidents”.
    • Non-compliance found with Bank policies OP 4.01, OP 4.12 and the IPF policy.
    • TANAPA reported 50 rangers killed nationwide in 2018–2024.
    • Disbursements suspended effective 18 April 2024; project cancelled by the government in November 2024; Board approved a Management Action Plan on 1 April 2025.

    Who gained

    Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

    Reached nature or the ground

    Not published
    No figure published.

    Gained elsewhere

    Not totalled
    Currency: USD · Window: 2017–2024. All figures cover the same period. * Estimate built from cited figures.

    Responses on record

    • world-bank (2024): Management conceded that the project “had increased the possibility of violent confrontations”. · World Bank Inspection Panel
    • world-bank (1 April 2025): The Board approved a Management Action Plan on 1 April 2025.
    • tanzania-gov (November 2024): The project was closed in November 2024 at the government's request.
    • tanapa (2024): Reported that 50 rangers were killed nationwide in 2018–2024. · World Bank Inspection Panel

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    1. 2024-09-16Claimant won
      Inspection Panel investigation of the REGROW project
      World Bank Inspection Panel (accountability mechanism, not a court) · Administrative · Community members who complained to the Panel → World Bank (project management)

      The Panel's report of 16 September 2024 found non-compliance with Bank policies OP 4.01, OP 4.12 and the IPF policy. The Board approved a Management Action Plan on 1 April 2025. The Panel's findings are not a court judgment. World Bank Inspection Panel

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What nature saw

    Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

    Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

    Park area
    ~1m → 2m+ ha
    Reported expansion of Ruaha National Park alongside the project
    Panel finding
    Non-compliance
    Bank policies OP 4.01, OP 4.12 and IPF policy (16 Sep 2024)
    Villages at risk
    28
    More than 84,000 people reported at risk after the project ended

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Figures

    • Insufficient Disbursed: Reports range from US$100m to US$132m; no primary figure in the sources.
    • Insufficient Deaths: Oakland Institute allegation of killings or disappearances; Witness Radio reports 11 killed and 5 disappeared. No official finding.
    • Insufficient Deaths reported apr 2021: A fisherman and two others, one aged 14, reported killed by rangers in April 2021; no prosecution found.
    • Insufficient Area (ha): Reported expansion of Ruaha National Park from about 1 million ha.

    Accounts

    • Disputed Did the project and its ranger rules contribute to violence and killings around Ruaha?
    • Disputed Did the Bank's mandate cover the conduct of government agencies?

    Record

    • None on record No prosecutions were found for the Ruaha killings, nor for the other conservation-related abuses in the same research list.
    • None on record Reported disbursements range from US$100 million to US$132 million; no single primary figure is given.
    • Insufficient The allegations (at least 12 killings or disappearances per the Oakland Institute; 11 killed and 5 disappeared per Witness Radio) are reported but not independently verified; no official finding is recorded.
    • None on record Eviction and compensation claims in Ruaha are reported as continuing; their forum and status are not identified.

    Did the harm stop?

    Disbursements were suspended in April 2024 and the government cancelled the project in November 2024. A summary of reports says more than 84,000 people in 28 villages remain at risk.

    Who paid?

    Residents of villages around Ruaha National Park, according to the Inspection Panel's findings and the allegations of civil-society groups; the sources give no compensation figure.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts— Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers✓ International bodies

    International bodies

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.

    Science and environment

    Hectare (ha)
    A unit of area equal to 10,000 square metres, about 2.5 acres. 100 hectares make one square kilometre.

    Bonds and banking

    Arranger
    The bank that structures and sells a bond or loan deal, usually for a fee.

    Law and courts

    Land titling
    Formal legal recognition of ownership of land.