Method
Each case is told from seven perspectives: what happened, what was said, how it looked, who gained, what nature saw, what is not known, and the sources. The perspectives sit side by side.
Facts are written in plain news language. Companies, agencies and officials are named as the documented record names them, with the role the record gives them.
Where a figure is our own arithmetic from cited numbers, it is marked estimate and the working is shown. Ratios compare figures from the same period.
Missing evidence is recorded as data: undisclosed earnings, the absence of an independent evaluation, a case no court has heard, deaths reported without verification. Each can be filtered.
Every case opens with nature's report, written in nature's first person and in data: harm on record, harm calculated by published methods from figures on record, and harm that no one recorded.
Each case carries sources from the parties themselves: the company's own statement, the government's announcement, the court's ruling, the press report, the community or civil-society account, and the researchers' findings. Where these accounts differ, they are set side by side with their sources.
The database asks one question of its own, from nature's side: did nature suffer? The answer is "harm on record" when the record holds a measurement of it, and "not measured" otherwise.
Case files are drafted from our research files and checked by an editor against the linked sources before publication. Every published fact carries a source link. Material that is reported but not verified is labelled as such.
Companies and institutions are named as the record names them. Individuals are named when they hold a public role, were charged, convicted or named in an official finding, or are defenders killed or disappeared in widely reported cases; others are described by their role. In criminal cases that are still open, people are described as charged or on trial.
Where a named organisation has responded in public, its response is shown with the case. Each case file carries the date of its last update.
Where a case records an input — an area of forest lost, a volume spilled — an established method can estimate a further consequence. These estimates are labelled, kept apart from the record, given as ranges and stated in physical units (tonnes, animals, hectares).
CO₂ from the biomass of lost forest IPCC Tier 1
CO₂ (t) = area lost (ha) × above-ground biomass (t d.m./ha) × (1 + root-to-shoot ratio) × carbon fraction × 44/12
Covers: Carbon in living trees, above and below ground, released when the forest is lost. Leaves out: Soil carbon, dead wood and litter, other greenhouse gases from burning, and any regrowth. The estimate is therefore partial.
Range: The low end combines the IPCC mean minus one standard deviation for biomass, the low root-to-shoot ratio and a carbon fraction of 0.44; the high end combines the mean plus one standard deviation, the high ratio and 0.49. Where the forest type is not on record, the range spans every type listed. The range runs from the lowest to the highest combination of these values.
| Forest type (IPCC) | Above-ground biomass, t d.m./ha (mean ± SD) | Root-to-shoot ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Tropical rainforest, Americas, primary | 307.1 ± 104.9 | 0.221 (0.185–0.257) |
| Tropical rainforest, Americas, secondary >20 years | 206.4 ± 80.4 | 0.221 (0.185–0.257) |
| Tropical rainforest, Americas, secondary ≤20 years | 75.7 ± 34.5 | 0.221 (0.185–0.257) |
| Tropical moist forest, Americas, primary | 187.3 ± 94 | 0.284 (0.223–0.345) |
| Tropical moist forest, Americas, secondary >20 years | 131 ± 54.2 | 0.284 (0.223–0.345) |
| Tropical moist forest, Americas, secondary ≤20 years | 55.7 ± 28.7 | 0.2845 (0.2235–0.3455) |
| Tropical dry forest, Americas, primary | 127.5 ± 72.6 | 0.379 (0.339–0.419) |
| Tropical dry forest, Americas, secondary >20 years | 118.9 ± 81.3 | 0.334 (0.294–0.374) |
| Tropical dry forest, Americas, secondary ≤20 years | 32.2 ± 24.2 | 0.334 (0.294–0.374) |
| Tropical mountain forest, Americas, primary | 195 ± 95.6 | 0.283 (0.123–0.443) |
| Tropical mountain forest, Africa, primary | 190 ± 131.2 | 0.27 (0.27–0.28) |
Carbon fraction 0.47 (0.44–0.49); CO₂ = C × 44/12. Sources: 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines, Vol. 4, Ch. 4 (Forest Land), Tables 4.4 and 4.7 (updated); 2006 IPCC Guidelines, Vol. 4, Ch. 4 (Forest Land), Tables 4.3 and 4.4.
Applied to: Cordillera Azul National Park carbon project, Kenya's 15 billion trees target
Advertisements are served through an automated advertising network.
Factual errors are corrected and logged with the date of the change. See Corrections.
Science and environment
- Biomass, root-to-shoot ratio, carbon fraction
- Biomass is the dry weight of living plants per hectare. The root-to-shoot ratio adds the weight of roots. The carbon fraction is the share of that weight that is carbon, about 47% in tropical forests.
- Hectare (ha)
- A unit of area equal to 10,000 square metres, about 2.5 acres. 100 hectares make one square kilometre.