Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
A case database · 1209 cases · 2139 actors

Who gains from saving nature?

Money moves in the name of nature: carbon credits, debt swaps, bans, parks, land. Each case below follows that money — what was promised, what reached the ground, who else was paid, and what nature recorded.

Browse all cases Compare cases The series
1 : 33

For each dollar that financed nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature.

Source: UNEP, State of Finance for Nature 2026. The full ledger →
Map unavailable offline.
Debt-for-nature swap · Belize · 2021–2041

Belize blue bond

A debt buyback tied to protecting 30% of Belize's ocean. Protection stands at 20.3%; about $6 million in grants were approved in three and a half years.

$84–86m
Premiums and costs over the deal's life
No court caseNo independent ecological evaluation
Protected area / relocation · Tanzania · 1992–2026

Ngorongoro and Loliondo relocations

The Tanzanian government has set aside land in Loliondo to protect the Serengeti-Mara ecosystem and has been relocating residents of the Ngorongoro Conservation Area to Msomera since June 2022, with a target above 82,000 people. It calls the relocation voluntary; Human Rights Watch reported that services were cut to push people out. A UAE-based company has held exclusive hunting rights over 400,000 hectares since 1992.

≈ $86m
Conservation-area revenue, 2023–24
Displacement reportedCase pending / contested
Natural-capital land · United Kingdom · 2020–2025

Scotland's natural-capital land rush

Companies bought estates to plant forests and offset emissions. Estate prices rose about 87% in a year; at one flagship site more than half the young pines died.

+157%
Woodland carbon unit price
No court caseNo independent ecological evaluation
Trophy hunting revenue · Zimbabwe · 2010–2015

CAMPFIRE and elephant trophy hunting

Hunters paid $17 million in nine districts over six years. About $1.24 million went to law enforcement; households received about $13 a year, mostly as projects.

≈ 7%
Share of hunters' payments to law enforcement
No court caseNo independent ecological evaluation
Carbon credits · Kenya · 2012–2026

Northern Kenya Grasslands Carbon Project and the Isiolo court ruling

A Verra-registered soil-carbon project in northern Kenya covers 1.9 million hectares. In January 2025 a Kenyan court found that two of its conservancies had been set up without adequate public participation.

about $22m vs $42–90m
Documented payments to communities and conservancies vs reported gross credit sales
Court ruling existsKey earnings undisclosed
Carbon credits · Peru · 2008–2026

Cordillera Azul National Park carbon project

Shell and TotalEnergies paid more than $80 million for credits from a Peruvian park. A satellite analysis found forest loss more than doubled during the project period.

262 → 572 ha
Annual forest loss, before vs during
Case pending / contestedKey earnings undisclosed

All 1209 cases, with filters, timeline and data table →

Carbon and conservation finance

Carbon credit
A certificate representing one tonne of carbon dioxide (or equivalent) that a project says it reduced, avoided or removed. Buyers use credits to balance their own emissions in climate claims.
Debt-for-nature swap
A deal in which a government's debt is bought back or refinanced at a discount, and part of the savings is committed to conservation.