Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Plastic waste and recycling claims · Switzerland · 2024–2026

UN plastics treaty negotiations (INC-5, Geneva, Nairobi, Bangkok)

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 2 none on record · 1 insufficient · 1 not measured · 3 disputed · 1 unclear See the gaps

Two formal rounds of negotiations on a UN plastics treaty, in Busan in 2024 and Geneva in 2025, ended without agreement. Industry lobbyists outnumbered some national delegations, and a production cap remained in square brackets in the chair's 2026 text.

234 vs 233Registered fossil-fuel and chemical industry lobbyists at Geneva (INC-5.2) vs the EU and its 27 member states combined
Lobbyist count by CIEL; EU and member-state delegation size as reported by IPEN. At Busan: 220 lobbyists vs 140 delegates for host Korea.

Status As of the end of September 2026: two formal rounds ended without agreement, a new chair was elected in February 2026, and informal meetings in Nairobi and Bangkok left the production cap in square brackets; the next formal round is reported for March 2027 but is unconfirmed.

What?
Negotiations on a UN plastics treaty ended two formal rounds (Busan 2024, Geneva 2025) without agreement; informal meetings in 2026 left the production cap in square brackets. SeafoodSource
Where?
Busan (South Korea), Geneva (Switzerland), Nairobi (Kenya) and Bangkok (Thailand).
When?
November 2024 to September 2026; the next formal round is reported for March 2027 but unconfirmed. Climate Home News
Who?
Gained
  • Fossil-fuel and chemical industry delegations — Registered 220 lobbyists at Busan and 234 at Geneva; no production cap was agreed IPEN
  • States opposing a production cap (a Saudi Arabia-led bloc) — No production cap in the agreed text; the cap remained in square brackets in the chair's August 2026 text IPEN
Lost
None on record
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Governments are divided between limiting plastic production and addressing only waste management. Climate Home News
How?
Formal rounds ended without consensus; the Saudi Arabia-led bloc opposed a vote, and informal meetings in 2026 continued under a new chair. IPEN
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

The fifth session of the UN committee negotiating a plastics treaty (INC-5) was held in Busan, South Korea, from 25 November to 1 December 2024 and ended without agreement. The Centre for International Environmental Law (CIEL) counted 220 registered fossil-fuel and chemical industry lobbyists there, more than the 140 delegates of the host country; the previous session had 196. Earth Journalism Network reported that the largest representations were Dow, ExxonMobil, BASF and SABIC.

The resumed session in Geneva (INC-5.2) ended in the early morning of 15 August 2025, again without agreement. Trade press reported that more than 100 countries backed a cap on production, and that Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iran and others opposed it. IPEN reported that a Saudi Arabia-led bloc of like-minded countries opposed both a production cap and a vote, and that Kuwait said the text crossed its red lines. CIEL counted 234 industry lobbyists in Geneva, more than the combined delegation of the EU and its 27 member states (233); Dow and the American Chemistry Council had seven each and ExxonMobil six. Nineteen of the 234 were on official country delegations.

The chair, Luis Vayas Valdivieso of Ecuador, resigned in October 2025. A one-day session (INC-5.3) in Geneva on 7 February 2026 elected Julio Cordano of Chile as chair, with 63% of the vote according to OceanCare. Informal meetings followed. At a heads-of-delegation meeting in Nairobi (30 June–3 July 2026), Saudi Arabia, the United States, Russia and India asked for the treaty to cover only waste management, according to Climate Home News, and the chair's list of topics did not include production. In Bangkok (27–30 September 2026) heads of delegation met again; the production cap remained in square brackets in the chair's August 2026 “Aid to Negotiations” document.

Separately, the State of California sued ExxonMobil in 2024 over its plastics-recycling claims. The suit and ExxonMobil's counter-suit were both pending in the record.

  1. 2024Busan (INC-5), 25 Nov–1 Dec: no agreement; 220 industry lobbyists registered
  2. 2024California sues ExxonMobil over plastics-recycling claims (23 Sep, San Francisco Superior Court)
  3. 2025Geneva (INC-5.2) ends around 6 am on 15 Aug without agreement; 234 industry lobbyists registered
  4. 2025Chair Luis Vayas Valdivieso resigns (October)
  5. 20267 Feb: INC-5.3 in Geneva elects Julio Cordano as chair; March: roadmap issued; 30 Jun–3 Jul: heads of delegation meet in Nairobi; August: chair's “Aid to Negotiations” text, production cap in square brackets; 27–30 Sep: heads of delegation meet in Bangkok

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Should the treaty limit plastic production, or only address waste?
Government and regulators
A Saudi Arabia-led bloc, with Kuwait

At Geneva the bloc opposed a production cap and a vote; Kuwait said the text crossed its red lines.

IPEN
Government and regulators
Saudi Arabia, the United States, Russia and India

At the Nairobi informal meeting (June–July 2026) asked for waste management only.

Climate Home News
Government and regulators
More than 100 countries (per trade press)

Backed a cap on plastic production at Geneva in August 2025.

Packaging Insights
International bodies
Chair, Julio Cordano

The chair's topic list at Nairobi did not include production, and the August 2026 “Aid to Negotiations” left the production cap in square brackets.

Renewable Matter
Communities and civil society
NGOs

Say the chair's text weakens production measures.

How large was the industry presence at the talks?
Communities and civil society
CIEL

Counted 220 registered fossil-fuel and chemical industry lobbyists at Busan and 234 at Geneva.

CIEL
Press and investigations
IPEN

At Geneva the 234 industry lobbyists outnumbered the combined delegation of the EU and its 27 member states (233).

IPEN
Communities and civil society
CIEL, via Sustainability Online

Nineteen of the 234 lobbyists were on official country delegations.

Sustainability Online
Does advanced recycling at ExxonMobil's Baytown facility return waste as plastic?
Government and regulators
California Attorney General

The suit says almost all waste entering the facility leaves as fuel rather than plastic, and that the quantity returned as plastic is under 1% of ExxonMobil's virgin capacity.

Company or project
ExxonMobil

Says advanced recycling works at Baytown, and countersued the Attorney General for defamation.

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

  • A pledge to end plastic waste: 15 million tonnes and USD 1.5 billion
    Alliance to End Plastic Waste (industry alliance)
  • Advanced recycling at the Baytown facility described as working
    ExxonMobil

Recorded

  • Busan (INC-5): 220 registered fossil-fuel and chemical industry lobbyists; host Korea had 140 delegates; the previous session (INC-4) had 196.
  • Geneva (INC-5.2): 234 registered fossil-fuel and chemical industry lobbyists, more than the EU and its 27 member states combined (233); Dow and the American Chemistry Council had 7 each, ExxonMobil 6.
  • Geneva (INC-5.2): 19 of the 234 lobbyists were on official country delegations (CIEL count).
  • Geneva (INC-5.2): trade press reported that both of the chair's drafts were rejected and that the December 2024 chair's text remains the fallback.
  • INC-5.2 in Geneva ended without consensus; the next session was put off to 2026.
  • Nairobi informal meeting: Saudi Arabia, the United States, Russia and India asked for waste management only; the chair's topic list did not include production.
  • The chair's August 2026 “Aid to Negotiations” left the production cap in square brackets; NGOs say the text weakens production measures.
  • The Alliance to End Plastic Waste (AEPW) had pledged 15 million tonnes and USD 1.5 billion; figures dated 8 September 2026 and attributed to AAP and AEPW show 378,147 tonnes, about 2.5% of the pledge.
  • Saudi Arabia is reported to recycle a small share of its own waste (3–4%).

Who gained

Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

Reached nature or the ground

Not published
No figure published.

Gained elsewhere

Not totalled
Currency: USD · Window: 2024–2026. All figures cover the same period. * Estimate built from cited figures.

Responses on record

  • exxonmobil (2024): Says advanced recycling works at its Baytown facility; countersued the California Attorney General for defamation.

In court and with insurers

Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

Lawsuits and rulings

  1. 2024-09-23–Ongoing
    California v. ExxonMobil (plastics-recycling claims)
    San Francisco Superior Court · Civil · State of California (Attorney General) → ExxonMobil

    The complaint alleges nuisance, unfair competition, water pollution and false environmental marketing. The Attorney General said the plastics crisis is fuelled by a recycling myth. ExxonMobil countersued the Attorney General for defamation; both cases were pending.

Insurers

No insurer decision on record.

What nature saw

Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

Formal rounds without agreement
2
Busan (25 Nov–1 Dec 2024) and Geneva (August 2025)
Production cap in the chair's August 2026 text
In square brackets
Renewable Matter, September 2026
Industry lobbyists vs EU delegation at Geneva
234 vs 233
CIEL count; IPEN, August 2025

What we don't know

Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

Nature

  • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

Accounts

  • Disputed Should the treaty limit plastic production, or only address waste?
  • Disputed How large was the industry presence at the talks?
  • Disputed Does advanced recycling at ExxonMobil's Baytown facility return waste as plastic?

Record

  • Insufficient The date and venue of the next formal round: reported as 13–24 March 2027, but the dates and venue of INC-5.4 are unconfirmed.
  • None on record How much the Alliance to End Plastic Waste has actually spent by its own accounts: not found; a figure of $375m comes through the outlet Unearthed.
  • Unclear No ruling in the California v. ExxonMobil suit is recorded; both the suit and the counter-suit are pending.
  • None on record Japan's stance on a production cap: not found in the sources.

Did the harm stop?

Not applicable: the negotiations have not produced an agreed text, and the sources record no limit on plastic production.

Who paid?

Not established in the sources.

Sources

Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations✓ Communities and civil society— Researchers✓ International bodies

International bodies

Connected cases

Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.