Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Killings and repression of defenders · Democratic Republic of the Congo · 2006–2020

Pillay panel finds no proof WWF directed ranger abuses it supported

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
What the record lacks: 2 none on record · 1 not disclosed · 5 insufficient · 1 not measured See the gaps

A panel commissioned by WWF and chaired by former UN rights chief Navi Pillay reported in November 2020 that the charity had received reports of ranger abuse since 2008. The case concerns the safety of communities living around parks that WWF co-managed or supported.

What?
A WWF-commissioned panel found no evidence that WWF directed abuses by rangers it supported, but reported earlier warnings. Mongabay
Where?
Democratic Republic of the Congo (Salonga), Republic of the Congo (Messok Dja), Nepal (Chitwan) BuzzFeed News
When?
2006–2020 Mongabay
Who?
Gained
  • WWF — received more than USD 150 million from the US government since 2004 for this work Mongabay
Lost
  • Local communities near Salonga and Messok Dja — reported ranger violence, including beatings and sexual assault BuzzFeed News
Harmed
  • Villagers reported as victims of ranger violence — were beaten, assaulted or killed, according to BuzzFeed News reporting BuzzFeed News
Why?
The panel said WWF put its relationship with governments ahead of community security. Mongabay
How?
Abuses by ranger units funded or equipped with WWF support, according to BuzzFeed News reporting. BuzzFeed News
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

A panel commissioned by WWF and chaired by former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay found no evidence that WWF directed ranger abuses, but reported that WWF staff had received reliable reports since 2008 (Mongabay, 8 December 2020).

The panel said serious allegations reached senior management in 2014–2018, and that consultants' reports were softened before reaching the board (Mongabay, 2020).

A BuzzFeed News investigation published on 4 March 2019 reported that WWF-funded or equipped rangers in six countries beat villagers, sexually assaulted and killed people (BuzzFeed News, 2019).

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    1. 2007Dismissed
      Case against three park officials over a 2006 death in custody (Chitwan)
      · Criminal · → Three park officials

      Case against three officials dropped in 2007. One defendant was later hired by WWF Nepal, according to BuzzFeed News reporting. BuzzFeed News

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: WWF said it accepted the panel's recommendations (no link).
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: a 2018 survey of 231 people in 11 villages in Salonga found about one in four reported ranger violence.
    • Not disclosed Reported but not verified: WWF's own 2019 Salonga investigation found murder, rape and torture, and was not published.
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: a leaked UNDP draft on Messok Dja said WWF-backed ecoguards often beat Baka people, and WWF called these isolated incidents.
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: WWF said it referred six cases to the military prosecutor, and the Congolese park authority suspended suspected ecoguards.
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: Germany froze funding to WWF for Salonga in July 2019.
    • None on record Not reached: the full Pillay panel report, which was a PDF and not read.
    • None on record Not stated in the sources reviewed: the outcome of the Chitwan appeal, and how the panel dealt with the Chitwan case.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.