Gaza reconstruction and the Board of Peace's first contract
- Rebuilding 100,000 buildings would add at least 30 million tonnes of CO2. Queen Mary University of London
- Clearing the rubble could take 15 years. Al Jazeera
- The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
The first construction contract issued under the Board of Peace for Gaza was for a military post, ahead of a USD 2.45 billion plan. Researchers and UN agencies have put figures on the war's emissions, the rubble and the cost of recovery.
Followed by a USD 2.45 billion plan, as reported by The Irish Times, 6 August 2026.
Status As of August 2026: the Board of Peace had issued its first building contract, for a military base; the sources reviewed record no environmental assessment.
- Arkel — Received the first building contract. The Irish Times
What happened
In July 2024 UNEP was quoted as saying that clearing the rubble in Gaza could take 15 years and cost more than USD 500 million. In February 2025 the UN, the EU and the World Bank put the cost of rebuilding at USD 53.2 billion.
Two university studies estimated the emissions linked to the war. A 2024 study from Queen Mary University of London said rebuilding 100,000 buildings would generate at least 30 million tonnes of CO2. A study reported by Lancaster University in March 2026 put the war's emissions at about 33 million tonnes of CO2-equivalent and noted that military emissions fall outside mandatory reporting.
On 6 August 2026 The Irish Times reported that the Board of Peace had issued its first building contract, for a military base, to be built by the company Arkel. The report said a USD 2.45 billion plan followed.
- 2024UNEP: clearing Gaza rubble could take 15 years and cost more than USD 500 million (July); QMUL study on emissions from the war and from rebuilding
- 2025UN, EU and World Bank: rebuilding needs USD 53.2 billion (February)
- 2026Lancaster University reports study of the war's climate cost (March); Board of Peace issues its first building contract, for a military base (August)
How it looked
Shown
Recorded
- The first building contract issued by the Board of Peace was for a military base, to be built by Arkel; a USD 2.45 billion plan followed.
- UNEP said clearing the rubble could take 15 years and cost more than USD 500 million.
- The UN, EU and World Bank put rebuilding needs at USD 53.2 billion.
- Researchers estimated the war's emissions at about 33 million tonnes of CO2-equivalent, of which active military operations accounted for at least 1.3 million tonnes.
- Researchers estimated that rebuilding 100,000 buildings would generate at least 30 million tonnes of CO2.
- Rubble volume was given as between 39 and 61.5 million tonnes.
- Only three countries were reported to have funded the USD 2.45 billion plan.
In court and with insurers
Lawsuits and rulings
Insurers
What nature saw
Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.
What we don't know
Court
- None on record No court case on record.
Record
- None on record Military emissions are outside mandatory reporting, according to the authors of the 2026 study.
- None on record The sources reviewed do not state how the rubble will be treated or where it will be disposed of.
- None on record The sources reviewed do not give the value of the first contract.
Did the harm stop?
Not on record in the sources reviewed.
Who paid?
Not established in the sources reviewed.
Sources
Press and investigations
- Trump's Gaza Board of Peace issues first building contract for military baseThe Irish Times · 2026-08-06
- Asharq Al-Awsat report on the Board of Peace contractAsharq Al-Awsat · 2026-08
- Clearing Gaza rubble could take 15 years, UN agency saysAl Jazeera · 2024-07-15
- More than 50bn dollars needed to rebuild GazaAl Jazeera · 2025-02-19
Researchers
- Study highlights the hidden climate cost of the Israel-Gaza warLancaster University · 2026-03
- New study reveals substantial carbon emissions from the ongoing Israel-Gaza conflictQueen Mary University of London · 2024
Connected cases
- DuPont CFC phase-out and the ozone treaty United States · 1974–2019
- UN Environment Programme (International organisation) — here: Estimated rubble clearance time and cost; there: Hosts the Montreal Protocol ozone secretariat
- Half-Earth and 30x30 advocacy funding (Wyss Campaign for Nature) Global · 2016–2026
- UN Environment Programme (International organisation) — here: Estimated rubble clearance time and cost; there: Co-author of the Protected Planet Report 2024
- Ken Saro-Wiwa and the Ogoni Nine; Wiwa v Shell Nigeria · 1958–2026
- UN Environment Programme (International organisation) — here: Estimated rubble clearance time and cost; there: Author of the 2011 Ogoniland assessment
- Net Zero Banking Alliance exits and closure International · 2023–2026
- UN Environment Programme (International organisation) — here: Estimated rubble clearance time and cost; there: UN body whose statement on the 2023 insurer exits was reported
- Net-Zero Insurance Alliance collapse and insurers’ fossil underwriting Global · 2021–2025
- UN Environment Programme (International organisation) — here: Estimated rubble clearance time and cost; there: Convener of NZIA
- Ogoniland and Bodo spills clean-up (SPDC, HYPREP) Nigeria · 1958–2026
- UN Environment Programme (International organisation) — here: Estimated rubble clearance time and cost; there: Author of the 2011 assessment and fund proposal
- Plant-for-the-Planet: 13.6 billion trees Germany / Global · 2011–2024
- UN Environment Programme (International organisation) — here: Estimated rubble clearance time and cost; there: Original owner of the tree campaign
- UN plastics treaty negotiations (INC-5, Geneva, Nairobi, Bangkok) Switzerland · 2024–2026
- UN Environment Programme (International organisation) — here: Estimated rubble clearance time and cost; there: Convenes the negotiations; issued the announcement of the new chair
- UNEP estimate: about 2,000 tons of depleted uranium used in Iraq Iraq · date not stated
- UN Environment Programme (International organisation) — here: Estimated rubble clearance time and cost; there: Estimated the quantity of uranium used (about 2,000 tons)