Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Liability shifting (spin-offs, bankruptcy, closure bonds) · United States · 1943–2086

Hanford contractors settle false-claims suits as cleanup estimates rise

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
What the record lacks: 3 none on record · 1 insufficient · 1 not measured See the gaps

Bechtel and URS, now part of AECOM, paid $125 million in 2016 and $57.8 million in 2020 to settle claims over billing at the Hanford nuclear site. The US Department of Energy now estimates the cleanup at $364 billion to $589.4 billion, finishing in 2086; the stake for nature is nuclear waste beside the Columbia River.

What?
Bechtel and URS, now AECOM, settled overbilling claims at Hanford; the government's cleanup estimate rose to $364 billion to $589.4 billion. Tri-Cities Business News
Where?
Hanford Site, Washington state, beside the Columbia River
When?
Settlements in 2016 and 2020; DOE estimate in 2025; completion projected for 2086 Tri-Cities Business News
Who?
Gained
  • Bechtel — Hanford contracts continued after the settlements
Lost
Harmed
  • Columbia River and nearby communities — Nuclear waste stored on the riverbank awaiting treatment
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Contractors allegedly billed the government for defective nuclear-grade material and for idle labour hours, and settled the claims US Department of Justice
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

The US Justice Department settled claims that Bechtel and URS charged the government for defective nuclear material and used federal contract money for a lobbying campaign, for $125 million in November 2016 (Justice Department).

In September 2020 Bechtel and AECOM settled a suit over billing for idle labour hours at Hanford for $57.8 million, when the waste treatment plant was estimated at $16.8 billion (ENR).

In April 2025 the Department of Energy estimated the Hanford cleanup at $364 billion to $589.4 billion and projected completion in 2086 (Tri-Cities Business News).

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • None on record Not linked to a URL: the waste plant cost is about four times its 2000 estimate.
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: Bechtel has managed the estimated $17 billion Hanford vitrification plant for more than 22 years.
    • None on record Not stated: Bechtel's profit on the Hanford contracts.
    • None on record Not stated: whether the 2016 and 2020 settlements included an admission of liability.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Press and investigations

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.
    Similar cases
    Liability shifting (spin-offs, bankruptcy, closure bonds) · Chemical pollution · United States · 1980–2025
    US Superfund tax and funding shortfall
    Same type: Liability shifting (spin-offs, bankruptcy, closure bonds)Same countryHarm to nature not measured
    Liability shifting (spin-offs, bankruptcy, closure bonds) · Chemical pollution · Water use · United States · 2017–2021
    Duke Energy coal ash cleanup cost recovery (North Carolina)
    Same type: Liability shifting (spin-offs, bankruptcy, closure bonds)Same countryHarm to nature not measured
    Liability shifting (spin-offs, bankruptcy, closure bonds) · Chemical pollution · United States · 2015–2025
    Chemours spin-off liabilities
    Same type: Liability shifting (spin-offs, bankruptcy, closure bonds)Same countryHarm to nature not measured
    Liability shifting (spin-offs, bankruptcy, closure bonds) · United States · 2017
    US tax deductibility of environmental settlements (IRC 162(f))
    Same type: Liability shifting (spin-offs, bankruptcy, closure bonds)Same countryHarm to nature not measured
    Liability shifting (spin-offs, bankruptcy, closure bonds) · United States · 2007–2020
    Peabody, Patriot Coal and coal self-bonding
    Same type: Liability shifting (spin-offs, bankruptcy, closure bonds)Same countryHarm to nature not measured
    Liability shifting (spin-offs, bankruptcy, closure bonds) · United States · 2024
    Fieldwood bankruptcy and US offshore decommissioning
    Same type: Liability shifting (spin-offs, bankruptcy, closure bonds)Same countryHarm to nature not measured