Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Agriculture, livestock and food · Brazil · 2019–2026

EU mirror measure on antimicrobials and Brazil beef exclusion

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 1 none on record · 5 insufficient · 1 not measured · 1 disputed See the gaps

A measure adopted by the European Union in 2019 became applicable seven years later. From 3 September 2026 Brazil, which the EU did not list as providing sufficient antimicrobial assurances, can no longer export meat to the EU.

128.9 thousand tonnesBrazilian beef sent to the EU in 2025
Valued at $1.06 billion; Brazil is not on the EU list from 3 September 2026.

Status As of October 2026: the EU requirement applies from 3 September 2026 and Brazil is not on the list.

What?
An EU measure on antimicrobial use in imported animal products became applicable in 2026, and Brazil was not listed, so it cannot export meat to the EU from 3 September 2026.
Where?
European Union and Brazil.
When?
Measure adopted in 2019; Brazil not listed on 6 June 2026; requirement from 3 September 2026. Institut Veblen
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
  • Brazilian beef exporters — Lost access to the EU market, which took 128.9 thousand tonnes worth $1.06 billion in 2025.
Harmed
None on record
Why?
The EU found Brazil's antimicrobial assurances insufficient.
How?
The EU required exporting countries to give antimicrobial assurances and listed those that did; the sources reviewed put the number listed at 92.
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

In 2019 the European Union adopted what the sources call the mirror measure on antibiotics in livestock farming. The Veblen Institute wrote in May 2026 that it became applicable seven years later and that its implementing rules substantially weakened its scope.

The measure requires exporters of animal products to the EU to give antimicrobial assurances. A summary by AGRINFO, not independently verified, says that from 3 September 2026 exporting countries must document that no antimicrobials were used for growth promotion or reserved for humans during the animal's life.

On 6 June 2026 the EU did not list Brazil, having found its antimicrobial assurances insufficient. In 2025, 128.9 thousand tonnes of Brazilian beef worth $1.06 billion went to the EU. Brazil cannot export meat to the EU from 3 September 2026 and, as of October 2026, was not on the list. The record puts the number of countries or territories listed at 92.

The record places the measure against EU animal use data: antimicrobial use in animals fell 44% from 2014 to 2021, to 92.6 mg/kg against 125.0 mg/kg in humans in 2021. In 2024 EU sales to food animals rose 5% and the European Medicines Agency wrote that the decline since 2010–2022 might be slowing or reversing.

  1. 2019EU adopts the mirror measure on antibiotics in livestock farming
  2. 20266 June: EU does not list Brazil; 3 September: import requirement applicable and Brazil unable to export meat to the EU

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

How strong is the EU mirror measure as applied?
Communities and civil society
Veblen Institute

The implementing rules substantially weakened the scope of the measure adopted in 2019.

Institut Veblen
International bodies
European Union

Applied the measure from 3 September 2026 and did not list Brazil.

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

    Recorded

    • EU removed or did not list Brazil because its antimicrobial assurances were judged insufficient (6 June 2026)
    • 2025: 128.9 thousand tonnes of Brazilian beef, $1.06 billion, went to the EU
    • Measure adopted in 2019 and applicable seven years later; implementing rules weakened its scope (Veblen Institute, 13 May 2026)
      Institut Veblen
    • EU animal antimicrobial use fell 44% from 2014 to 2021; EU sales to food animals rose 5% in 2024

    Who gained

    Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

    Reached nature or the ground

    Not published
    No figure published.

    Gained elsewhere

    Not totalled
    Currency: USD · Window: 2025. All figures cover the same period. * Estimate built from cited figures.

    Responses on record

    • eu (2026-06-06): Did not list Brazil, having found its antimicrobial assurances insufficient.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What nature saw

    Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

    Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

    Brazilian beef to the EU, 2025
    128.9 thousand t
    Worth $1.06 billion; excluded from 3 September 2026
    EU animal antimicrobial use, 2014–2021
    -44%
    92.6 mg/kg in animals against 125.0 mg/kg in humans in 2021

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Accounts

    • Disputed How strong is the EU mirror measure as applied?

    Record

    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: that the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture treats compliance as primarily the private sector's work.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: that the Brazilian beef exporters' association Abiec expects a return to the EU market in the first half of 2027.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: that the 92 listed countries or territories entered the list on the basis of declarations on paper.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: the exact certification wording (no growth-promotion or human-reserved antimicrobials over the animal's life), taken from an AGRINFO summary.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: that growth-promotion use remains an official category in Brazil.
    • None on record No court or trade-dispute proceeding is recorded in the sources reviewed.

    Did the harm stop?

    Who paid?

    The sources reviewed record that Brazilian meat exporters lost access to the EU market from 3 September 2026; they do not quantify the loss.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts— Press and investigations✓ Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Communities and civil society

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.
    Similar cases
    Agriculture, livestock and food · Brazil · 2018
    Cargill IBAMA fine (Brazil)
    Same type: Agriculture, livestock and foodSame countryHarm to nature not measured
    Agriculture, livestock and food · Brazil · date not stated
    Green tobacco sickness in Rio Grande do Sul and tobacco curing deforestation
    Same type: Agriculture, livestock and foodSame countryHarm to nature not measured
    Agriculture, livestock and food · Brazil · 2021–2025
    Grain traders report 93–99% of Cerrado soy as deforestation-free
    Same type: Agriculture, livestock and foodSame countryHarm to nature not measured
    Agriculture, livestock and food · Global · 2021–2025
    Unilever sold The Vegetarian Butcher to JBS-owned Vivera in March 2025
    Same type: Agriculture, livestock and foodSame countryHarm to nature not measured
    Agriculture, livestock and food · Costa Rica · 2019
    Fresh Del Monte closure of four Costa Rica banana farms
    Same type: Agriculture, livestock and foodSame regionHarm to nature not measured
    Agriculture, livestock and food · Brazil · 2006–2026
    Amazon Soy Moratorium
    Same type: Agriculture, livestock and foodSame country