Cases / Oil, gas and coal operations · Canada · 2024
Westmoreland's claim over Alberta coal exit dismissed; company ordered to pay costs
Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.
Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
- The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
Canada won the claim by Westmoreland against Alberta's coal exit, which was dismissed on 17 December 2024 and left the company to pay Canada's costs. A second claim, by Lone Pine against Québec's fracking ban, is reported as dismissed in 2022 but was not verified.
What?
Westmoreland's claim against Canada over Alberta's coal exit was dismissed on 17 December 2024. Global Affairs Canada
Where?
Alberta, Canada Global Affairs Canada
When?
Dismissed on 17 December 2024 Global Affairs Canada
Who?
Gained
- Government of Canada — costs of US$215,950 and C$1,461,766 ordered against the company Global Affairs Canada
Lost
- Westmoreland — claim dismissed and costs ordered against it Global Affairs Canada
Harmed
None on recordWhy?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Company claim against Canada over the coal exit; dismissed, with costs awarded to Canada. Global Affairs Canada
6 of 6 questions answered from the record
What happened
The record, in order.
Westmoreland brought a claim against Canada over Alberta's coal exit, and it was dismissed on 17 December 2024, according to Global Affairs Canada.
The company was ordered to pay Canada costs of US$215,950 and C$1,461,766.
In court and with insurers
Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.
Lawsuits and rulings
- 2024-12-17DismissedWestmoreland v. Canada (Alberta coal exit)Not named in the sources reviewed · investor-state claim · Westmoreland → Canada
The claim over Alberta's coal exit was dismissed on 17 December 2024, and the company was ordered to pay Canada's costs of US$215,950 and C$1,461,766. Global Affairs Canada
Insurers
No insurer decision on record.
What we don't know
Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.
Nature
- Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.
Record
- Insufficient Reported but not verified: Lone Pine's claim against Québec's ban on fracking under the St. Lawrence River was dismissed in 2022; the amount claimed is given as $110 million to $250 million.
- None on record The sources reviewed do not show whether the cost awards were paid.
- None on record The sources reviewed do not name the forum or the treaty for the Westmoreland claim.
Did the harm stop?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Who paid?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Sources
Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers
Press and investigations
- Westmoreland company (Global Affairs Canada dispute page)Global Affairs Canada ·
Connected cases
Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.
- Alberta and Ottawa tie new oil pipeline to Pathways carbon capture plan Canada · 2025
- Government of Canada (Government) — here: respondent; there: Party to the November 2025 agreement; federal tax credit
- Government of Alberta (Government) — here: subject of the coal exit measure; there: Party to the November 2025 agreement; 12 percent grant
- Alberta orphan wells and mine liabilities Canada · 2002
- Government of Canada (Government) — here: respondent; there: Source of federal funding (2020) and loans
- Government of Alberta (Government) — here: subject of the coal exit measure; there: Funder of the Site Rehabilitation Program
- Alberta orphan wells, closure liabilities and the Redwater ruling Canada · 2002
- Government of Canada (Government) — here: respondent; there: Source of federal funding (2020) and loans
- Government of Alberta (Government) — here: subject of the coal exit measure; there: Funder of the Site Rehabilitation Program
- About 100 tonnes of iron released off Haida Gwaii in 2012 ocean experiment Canada · 2012–2013
- Government of Canada (Government) — here: respondent; there: Environment ministry searched in 2013; no charges recorded
- Canada narrowed federal environmental reviews in 2012 and again in 2025 Canada · 2012–2025
- Government of Canada (Government) — here: respondent; there: Federal government; subject of the 2012 assessment law and Bill C-5
- Canada's Giant Mine arsenic cleanup cost rises to CAD 4.38 billion Canada · 1948–2038
- Government of Canada (Government) — here: respondent; there: Federal government funding the remediation
- Giant Mine cleanup cost in Yellowknife rose to 4.38 billion Canadian dollars Canada · 1999–2022
- Government of Canada (Government) — here: respondent; there: Bears the federal cost of the cleanup
- Lac-Mégantic rail disaster (Quebec) Canada · 2012–2026
- Government of Canada (Government) — here: respondent; there: Contributed C$75 million to the settlement fund
- Québec caribou emergency order and the 17 percent protection target Canada · 2020–2026
- Government of Canada (Government) — here: respondent; there: Began the emergency-order process
- Ruby River seeks $588m-$1bn from Canada over rejected Québec LNG plant Canada · 2021
- Government of Canada (Government) — here: respondent; there: respondent
- Soviet nuclear satellite Cosmos 954 crashes in Canada; USSR pays C$3m in 1981 Canada · 1978–1981
- Government of Canada (Government) — here: respondent; there: Claimant for damage from Cosmos 954
- TC Energy's claim over Keystone XL cancellation dismissed for lack of jurisdiction United States · 2021–2024
- Government of Alberta (Government) — here: subject of the coal exit measure; there: committed financing and loan guarantee to the pipeline
- Trans Mountain pipeline insurers (Canada) Canada · 2018–2024
- Government of Canada (Government) — here: respondent; there: Owner since 2018; guarantor of the credit facility