Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Insurance, liability and compensation funds · Canada · 2012–2026

Lac-Mégantic rail disaster (Quebec)

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
People
  • 47 people died.
    Killed in the explosion on 6 July 2013.
What the record lacks: 1 none on record · 1 not measured · 3 disputed · 3 unclear See the gaps

A runaway train carrying crude oil exploded in the centre of Lac-Mégantic, Quebec, in July 2013, killing 47 people. The railway went bankrupt, about 25 parties funded a settlement of roughly C$440–460 million, and Canadian Pacific, which did not contribute, was not found liable by the Quebec courts.

C$200m+ vs C$25mReported cleanup cost vs the railway's insurance cap
Cleanup above C$200 million as reported by AP; Montreal, Maine & Atlantic's policy was capped at C$25 million.

Status As of May 2026: Quebec's claim against Canadian Pacific failed after the Supreme Court of Canada refused leave to appeal on 14 May 2026.

What?
A train carrying 72 tank cars of crude oil slid down a slope at night and exploded in the centre of Lac-Mégantic; 47 people died. The railway went bankrupt and Canadian Pacific, which did not contribute, was not found liable.
Where?
Lac-Mégantic, Quebec, Canada.
When?
6 July 2013, at night; legal proceedings ran until the Supreme Court of Canada refused leave on 14 May 2026.
Who?
Gained
  • Canadian Pacific — Paid nothing into the settlement fund; Quebec's claim against it failed through to the Supreme Court of Canada's refusal of leave in May 2026. Canadian Pacific via U.S. SEC EDGAR
Lost
  • Contributors to the settlement fund — About 25 parties, including the federal government (C$75 million, without admitting liability), insurers and Burkhardt.
Harmed
  • Lac-Mégantic and its residents — 47 people died; cleanup alone cost more than C$200 million.
Why?
The accident investigation board listed 18 causes; the single-engineer decision, approved in May 2012, was not among them.
How?
A train of 72 tank cars of crude oil slid down a slope at night and exploded in the town centre.
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

On 6 July 2013 a train carrying 72 tank cars of crude oil slid down a slope at night and exploded in the centre of Lac-Mégantic, Quebec. 47 people died. The train was run by Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway (MMA) and was driven by a single engineer.

MMA had received permission to run trains with a single engineer in May 2012. According to the research record, Transport Canada's own Montreal office and the union had opposed the change, and the company did not release its risk assessment, citing commercial secrecy. The accident investigation board listed 18 causes; the single-engineer decision was not among them.

Three MMA employees — the engineer Tom Harding, the traffic controller Richard Labrie and the operations manager Jean Demaître — were tried on charges of negligence causing death. In January 2018 a jury acquitted all three. Residents of the town said the wrong people had been tried. MMA's chairman, Edward Burkhardt, was never charged; he has said he lost his investment in the bankruptcy, and he settled in the civil case.

MMA's insurance policy was capped at C$25 million and covered property, injury and cleanup, according to AP and the Bangor Daily News. Cleanup alone cost more than C$200 million, AP reported. MMA filed for bankruptcy in Canada and the United States. About 25 parties, including the federal government, which paid C$75 million without admitting liability, funded a settlement of about C$440–460 million; the bankruptcy plans distributed about C$440 million.

Canadian Pacific (CP), the company that delivered the oil, was the only targeted company that refused to contribute. Quebec sued CP, claiming C$409 million, later reduced to C$315 million. In December 2022 the Quebec Superior Court found that CP's conduct was not the “direct, immediate and logical cause” and placed the fault on the engineer and MMA. The Quebec Court of Appeal upheld the ruling on 26 February 2025, and the Supreme Court of Canada refused leave to appeal on 14 May 2026. CP paid nothing.

  1. 2012May: MMA obtains permission for single-engineer operation; Transport Canada's Montreal office and the union had opposed it
  2. 20136 July: train of 72 crude-oil tank cars slides down a slope at night and explodes in the town centre; 47 dead
  3. 2018January: jury acquits the engineer, the traffic controller and the operations manager
  4. 2022December: Quebec Superior Court finds CP's conduct was not the direct, immediate and logical cause
  5. 202526 February: Quebec Court of Appeal upholds the ruling
  6. 202614 May: Supreme Court of Canada refuses leave to appeal

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

“direct, immediate and logical cause”

Quebec Superior Court, on the standard CP's conduct did not meet · December 2022

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Was Canadian Pacific legally responsible for the disaster?
Government and regulators
Government of Quebec

Claimed C$409 million from CP, later reduced to C$315 million.

Canadian Pacific via U.S. SEC EDGAR
Courts
Quebec Superior Court (December 2022)

Found CP's conduct was not the direct, immediate and logical cause and placed the fault on the engineer and MMA.

Courts
Quebec Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of Canada

The Court of Appeal upheld the ruling on 26 February 2025; the Supreme Court refused leave on 14 May 2026.

Company or project
Canadian Pacific

Was the only targeted company that refused to contribute to the settlement fund.

Canadian Pacific via U.S. SEC EDGAR
Who should have been held criminally responsible?
Courts
Jury (January 2018)

Acquitted the engineer, the traffic controller and the operations manager of negligence causing death.

Courthouse News
Communities and civil society
Residents of Lac-Mégantic

The wrong people were tried.

Company or project
Edward Burkhardt, MMA chairman

Was never charged; said he lost his investment in the bankruptcy and settled in the civil case.

Was single-engineer operation properly assessed?
Government and regulators
Transport Canada

Approved single-engineer operation in May 2012.

Communities and civil society
Transport Canada's Montreal office and the union

Opposed the change.

Company or project
Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway

Did not release its risk assessment, citing commercial secrecy.

Government and regulators
Accident investigation board

Listed 18 causes; the single-engineer decision was not among them.

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

  • Did not release its single-engineer risk assessment, citing commercial secrecy.
    Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway
  • Said he lost his investment in the bankruptcy.
    Edward Burkhardt, MMA chairman

Recorded

  • A train of 72 tank cars of crude oil slid down a slope at night and exploded in the centre of Lac-Mégantic; 47 people died.
  • Single-engineer operation was approved in May 2012; Transport Canada's Montreal office and the union had opposed it. The investigation board listed 18 causes; the single-engineer decision was not on the list.
  • Jury acquitted the engineer, the traffic controller and the operations manager in January 2018; the MMA chairman was not charged.
  • MMA's policy was capped at C$25 million; cleanup alone cost more than C$200 million (AP).
  • The bankruptcy plans distributed about C$440 million. CP was the only targeted company that refused to contribute.
  • Quebec claimed C$409 million from CP, later reduced to C$315 million.
  • Eight subrogated insurers claimed about C$14 million from CP.
  • Quebec Superior Court (December 2022), Quebec Court of Appeal (February 2025) and Supreme Court of Canada (leave refused 14 May 2026): Quebec's claim against CP failed.

Who gained

Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

Reached nature or the ground

Not published
No figure published.

Gained elsewhere

Not totalled
Currency: CAD · Window: 2013–2026. All figures cover the same period. * Estimate built from cited figures.

Responses on record

  • Canadian Pacific (2013–2026): Refused to contribute to the settlement fund; the courts found its conduct was not the direct, immediate and logical cause. · Canadian Pacific via U.S. SEC EDGAR
  • Edward Burkhardt (MMA chairman, never charged) (Date not in record): Said he lost his investment in the bankruptcy; he settled in the civil case.
  • Government of Canada (Date not in record): Paid C$75 million into the settlement fund without admitting liability.
  • Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway (Date not in record): Filed for bankruptcy in Canada and the United States.

In court and with insurers

Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

Lawsuits and rulings

  1. 2018-01Defendant won
    Criminal trial of three MMA employees over the deaths at Lac-Mégantic
    Quebec criminal court (jury) · Criminal · Prosecution → Tom Harding (engineer), Richard Labrie (traffic controller), Jean Demaître (operations manager)

    The three were tried for negligence causing death. A jury acquitted all three in January 2018. The MMA chairman was not charged. Courthouse News

  2. 2026-05-14Defendant wonCAD 315m Quebec's claim, reduced from C$409 million (million, per CP's annual report)
    Quebec's claim against Canadian Pacific
    Quebec Superior Court; Quebec Court of Appeal; Supreme Court of Canada · Civil · Quebec → Canadian Pacific

    In December 2022 the Superior Court found CP's conduct was not the “direct, immediate and logical cause”. The Court of Appeal ruled in February 2025 (26 February) and the Supreme Court of Canada refused leave on 14 May 2026. CP paid nothing.

  3. SettledCAD 440m About C$440 million distributed under the plans (million)
    MMA bankruptcy proceedings and settlement plans
    Bankruptcy proceedings in Canada and the United States · Civil · Claimants in the MMA bankruptcy proceedings → Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway

    MMA filed for bankruptcy in Canada and the United States. The plans distributed about C$440 million; the wider settlement fund was put at C$440–460 million from about 25 parties, including C$75 million from the federal government without admitting liability. Canadian Pacific via U.S. SEC EDGAR

  4. Settled
    Civil case against MMA's chairman
    Civil court (not identified in the record) · Civil · Civil claimants (not named in the record) → Edward Burkhardt

    Burkhardt was never criminally charged. He said he lost his investment in the bankruptcy and he settled in the civil case; the settlement terms were not in the record.

Insurers

  1. No policy foundCAD 25m Policy cap (million)
    XL Insurance Co Ltd → Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway

    MMA's policy was capped at C$25 million and covered property, injury and cleanup (AP, Bangor Daily News). The insurer was named as XL Insurance Co Ltd; an Insurance Insider headline reported that XL would pay $25 million, with no currency or date given in the record.

  2. No policy foundCAD 14m About C$14 million claimed from CP (million)
    Eight subrogated insurers (not named) → Policyholders (not named)

    Eight subrogated insurers claimed about C$14 million from CP. The outcome was not in the record. Canadian Pacific via U.S. SEC EDGAR

What nature saw

Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

Reported cleanup cost
C$200m+
Cleanup alone, as reported by AP
Railway's insurance cap
C$25m
Policy covered property, injury and cleanup (AP, Bangor Daily News)

What we don't know

Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

Nature

  • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

Insurers

  • Unclear XL Insurance Co Ltd: no decision on record.
  • Unclear Eight subrogated insurers (not named): no decision on record.

Accounts

  • Disputed Was Canadian Pacific legally responsible for the disaster?
  • Disputed Who should have been held criminally responsible?
  • Disputed Was single-engineer operation properly assessed?

Record

  • Unclear Whether XL Insurance Co Ltd's payment under the C$25 million policy was made in full: the record holds a trade-press headline that XL would pay $25 million, with no currency or date given.
  • None on record The volume of oil released was not taken from a primary source.

Did the harm stop?

A one-night event on 6 July 2013. The last recorded legal step was the Supreme Court of Canada's refusal of leave on 14 May 2026.

Who paid?

Those harmed, the Canadian federal government (C$75 million, without admitting liability) and the other contributors to the settlement fund. MMA's policy was capped at C$25 million and CP paid nothing.

Sources

Voices on record: ✓ Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

Company or project

Press and investigations

Connected cases

Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.

Bonds and banking

Guarantee
A commitment by a third party, often a development bank, to pay if the borrower does not.
Liquidation, insolvency, bankruptcy
Legal processes that apply when a company cannot pay its debts; its assets are sold and claims against it may go unpaid.

Law and courts

Negligence and gross negligence
Negligence is a failure to take reasonable care. Gross negligence is a serious, reckless failure; under US oil-spill law a finding of gross negligence raises the maximum penalty.

Institutions

SEC
The US Securities and Exchange Commission, which regulates securities markets and what companies tell investors.