Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / War and military activity · Ukraine · 2022–2024

Ammonia release at Sumykhimprom (Sumy) and nitric-acid explosions at Rubizhne, 2022

Nature's voice · report
On 21 March 2022 about 67 tonnes of ammonia evaporated into my air at Sumy, according to Ukraine's Office of the Prosecutor General.
Did nature suffer? Yes. Harm is on record.
Recorded
  • After explosions at Rubizhne on about 5 and 9 April 2022, two reddish-brown plumes characteristic of nitrogen oxides rose into my air, according to CEOBS. CEOBS
  • At Rubizhne fires were still visible in May–June 2022 and the site was smouldering on 14 November 2022, according to CEOBS. CEOBS
What the record lacks: 3 none on record · 2 not measured · 4 disputed See the gaps

On 21 March 2022 an ammonia tank at the Sumykhimprom plant in Sumy released gas; in April 2022 explosions at a grain-elevator complex in Rubizhne sent nitrogen-oxide plumes into the air. Ukraine's Prosecutor General notified five Russian officers of suspicion over the Sumy release; Russia's Ministry of Defence gave a different account.

More than UAH 10 millionDamage to the state stated by Ukraine's Prosecutor General (Sumy release)
As stated on 28 August 2024; 67 tonnes of ammonia evaporated into the air, according to the same office.

Status As of August 2024: suspicion notified in absentia to five Russian officers over the Sumy release; no trial on record. Responsibility for the Rubizhne explosions is disputed.

What?
An ammonia tank at the Sumykhimprom plant released gas on 21 March 2022, and nitric-acid tanks at the Golden Agro complex in Rubizhne exploded in April 2022, sending nitrogen-oxide plumes into the air. CEOBS
Where?
Sumykhimprom plant, Sumy, Sumy Oblast (villages of Novoselytsia and Verkhnia Syrovatka nearby); Golden Agro grain-elevator complex, Rubizhne, Luhansk Oblast. Babel
When?
21 March 2022 at about 04:30 (Sumy); about 5 and 9 April 2022 (Rubizhne); suspicion notified 28 August 2024. Babel
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
  • Golden Agro owner — Estimated losses of USD 20 million (owner's estimate cited by CEOBS) CEOBS
  • State of Ukraine — More than UAH 10 million of damage from the Sumykhimprom release, as stated by the Prosecutor General's Office Babel
Harmed
  • Air around Sumy and Novoselytsia — 67 tonnes of ammonia, according to the Prosecutor General's Office Babel
  • Air over Rubizhne — Two plumes characteristic of nitrogen oxides (CEOBS) CEOBS
Why?
Disputed. Ukraine's Prosecutor General's Office says the Russian military fired at the Sumy plant; Russia's Ministry of Defence says Ukrainian nationalists staged a provocation. CEOBS says the Rubizhne plumes most likely came from nitric acid stored on site; responsibility for the explosions is disputed. Babel
How?
Rocket artillery fire at the plant's ammonia department (Prosecutor General's Office); nitric-acid tanks exploded at Rubizhne (CEOBS). Babel
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

At about 04:30 on 21 March 2022 an ammonia tank at the Sumykhimprom chemical plant in Sumy was damaged and gas was released. The head of Sumy Oblast, Dmytro Zhyvytskyi, announced the leak and warned residents of Novoselytsia; he said the affected zone was 2.5 km and that the city of Sumy was not threatened because of the wind direction. On 28 August 2024 Ukraine's Office of the Prosecutor General said there had been “a leak with the evaporation of 67 tons of ammonia into the air” and “More than 10 million hryvnias were caused to the state”.

On 19 March 2022 Russia's Ministry of Defence had said Ukrainian “nationalists” had planted mines at the chemical plant. On 21 March the ministry's spokesman Igor Konashenkov said they had “staged a pre-planned provocation” and that “The Russian army has not planned or delivered any strikes against Ukrainian facilities” that make or store poisonous chemicals. On 28 August 2024 the Prosecutor General's Office said two generals and three colonels of Russia's Western Military District had been notified of suspicion of violating the laws and customs of war, and said the Russian military had “purposefully” fired rocket artillery at the plant's ammonia department; it also said “There was no military facility near the enterprise”. The article cited does not give the Criminal Code article number, and no trial is on record.

At Rubizhne, Luhansk Oblast, CEOBS recorded large explosions at the Golden Agro grain-elevator complex on about 5 and 9 April 2022 that produced “two high-altitude and reddish-brown plumes, characteristic of nitrogen oxides”, “most likely” from nitric acid stored in tanks on site. The complex, with 30,000 tonnes of grain storage capacity, was almost entirely destroyed, with a crater about 25 m wide. Fires were still visible in May–June 2022 and the site was smouldering on 14 November 2022. The owner of Golden Agro estimated his losses at USD 20 million in a Telegram post cited by CEOBS. CEOBS noted numerous nitrate-fertiliser explosions in the first 12 months of the invasion, and recorded no measurements of the harm at Rubizhne.

Responsibility for the Rubizhne explosions is disputed. CEOBS disputed a Russian-media account of Ukrainian shelling from Lysychansk, noting that the area was under Ukrainian control at the time. CEOBS wrote that the occupying authorities' long-term plan does not mention environmental recovery at the site.

  1. 2022Russian Ministry of Defence says the Sumykhimprom storage was mined (19 Mar); ammonia release at about 04:30 (21 Mar); explosions at Rubizhne on about 5 and 9 Apr; fires still visible in May–June; smouldering on 14 Nov
  2. 2024Ukraine's Prosecutor General notifies two generals and three colonels of suspicion (28 Aug)

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

“More than 10 million hryvnias were caused to the state.”

Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine · 28 August 2024 · Babel

“there was a leak with the evaporation of 67 tons of ammonia into the air”

Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine · 28 August 2024 · Babel

“There was no military facility near the enterprise”

Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine · 28 August 2024 · Babel

“staged a pre-planned provocation”

Igor Konashenkov, spokesman of Russia's Ministry of Defence, on Ukrainian “nationalists” in Sumy · 21 March 2022 · translated from Russian · TASS

“The Russian army has not planned or delivered any strikes against Ukrainian facilities”

Igor Konashenkov, spokesman of Russia's Ministry of Defence (facilities that make or store poisonous chemicals) · 21 March 2022 · translated from Russian · TASS

“two high-altitude and reddish-brown plumes, characteristic of nitrogen oxides”

CEOBS, on the Rubizhne explosions · 2022 · CEOBS

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Responsibility for the Sumykhimprom ammonia release
Government and regulators
Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine

The Russian military purposefully fired rocket artillery at the plant's ammonia department; there was no military facility near the enterprise. Two generals and three colonels of the Western Military District were notified of suspicion of violating the laws and customs of war.

Babel
Government and regulators
Ministry of Defence of Russia (Igor Konashenkov)

Ukrainian nationalists planted mines at the plant on 19 March and staged a provocation; the Russian army had not delivered strikes on Ukrainian facilities that make or store poisonous chemicals.

TASS
Responsibility for the Rubizhne explosions
Press and investigations
Russian media (as described by CEOBS)

Attributed the explosions to Ukrainian shelling from Lysychansk.

CEOBS
Communities and civil society
CEOBS

The Lysychansk area was under Ukrainian control at the time.

CEOBS

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

  • Ammonia leaked at a chemical plant in Sumy; the affected area was 2.5 kilometres (headline)
    Babel, 21 March 2022 · Babel
  • Shelling of a chemical plant in Sumy with an ammonia leak: five commanders of the Russian army were informed of the suspicion (headline)
    Babel, 28 August 2024 · Babel

Recorded

  • Sumykhimprom: Ukraine's Prosecutor General's Office stated 67 tonnes of ammonia evaporated into the air and damage to the state of more than UAH 10 million.
  • Sumykhimprom: the regional head gave an affected zone of 2.5 km and said the city of Sumy was not threatened because of the wind direction.
  • Rubizhne: CEOBS gave the Golden Agro complex as near-totally destroyed, with a crater about 25 m wide and 30,000 tonnes of grain storage capacity.
  • Rubizhne: the owner of Golden Agro estimated losses at USD 20 million (archived Telegram post cited by CEOBS).

Who gained

Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

Reached nature or the ground

Not published
Damage caused to the state, Sumykhimprom ammonia release (Prosecutor General, 28 August 2024)> 10m
Window: 2022
No method stated. No compensation paid is on record.

Gained elsewhere

Not totalled
Golden Agro owner's estimated losses at Rubizhne (archived Telegram post cited by CEOBS)—
Window: 2022
USD 20 million as the owner estimated it; not converted.
Currency: UAH · Window: Mixed — see each line. Figures cover different periods and are not compared as a ratio. * Estimate built from cited figures.

Responses on record

  • Ministry of Defence of Russia (21 March 2022): Ukrainian “nationalists” in Sumy “staged a pre-planned provocation”; the ministry had warned on 19 March that they planted mines at the chemical plant; the Russian army had not planned or delivered any strikes against Ukrainian facilities that make or store poisonous chemicals. · TASS

In court and with insurers

Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

Lawsuits and rulings

  1. 2024–Ongoing
    Suspicion notified to five Russian officers over the Sumykhimprom shelling
    Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine · Criminal · Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine → Two generals and three colonels of Russia's Western Military District (names not given in the article cited)

    On 28 August 2024 the office said the five had been notified of suspicion of violating the laws and customs of war; suspicion notified in absentia. The article cited does not give the Criminal Code article. No trial is on record. Babel

Insurers

No insurer decision on record.

What nature saw

Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

Ammonia to air, Sumy
67 t
Prosecutor General's Office, 28 August 2024
Affected zone, Sumy
2.5 km
Sumy Oblast head, 21 March 2022
Plumes, Rubizhne
2
Reddish-brown, characteristic of nitrogen oxides (CEOBS)
Measurements at Rubizhne
None
CEOBS recorded no measurements

What we don't know

Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

Money

  • None on record Golden Agro owner's estimated losses at Rubizhne (archived Telegram post cited by CEOBS) — USD 20 million as the owner estimated it; not converted.

Accounts

  • Disputed Responsibility for the Sumykhimprom ammonia release
  • Disputed Responsibility for the Rubizhne explosions

Record

  • Not measured Not measured: Soil or water contamination around Sumykhimprom; no measurement is on record.
  • Not measured Not measured: Air, soil or water contamination at the Golden Agro complex in Rubizhne; CEOBS recorded no measurements.
  • Disputed Disputed: Responsibility for the Sumy release. Ukraine's Prosecutor General's Office says the Russian military fired at the plant; Russia's Ministry of Defence says Ukrainian nationalists staged a provocation. No independent forensic finding is on record.
  • Disputed Disputed: Responsibility for the Rubizhne explosions.
  • None on record None on record: Compensation paid for the Sumy release, or a trial of the five officers.
  • None on record None on record: Environmental recovery planning at the Golden Agro site (CEOBS).

Did the harm stop?

None on record.

Who paid?

None on record.

Sources

Voices on record: — Company or project✓ Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations✓ Communities and civil society— Researchers

Communities and civil society

Connected cases

Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.