Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Protected area / relocation · Canada · 2020–2026

Québec caribou emergency order and the 17 percent protection target

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured. Disputed
What the record lacks: 2 none on record · 3 insufficient · 1 not measured · 2 disputed See the gaps
Accounts of the harm differ
Should the federal emergency order go ahead for the three herds?
  • Government and regulators Government of Canada: Began the emergency-order process for the Val-d'Or, Charlevoix and Pipmuacan herds in June 2024. Noovo
  • Government and regulators Québec Chief Forester: Estimated a cut of 1.4 million cubic metres a year in allowable harvest, 4.1% province-wide. Noovo
  • Government and regulators Government of Québec: Forecast at least 2,000 job losses and declined to take part in consultations.

In 2024 the Canadian federal government began an emergency-order process for three Québec caribou herds. The Québec Chief Forester estimated it would cut the allowable timber harvest by 4.1% province-wide; the Québec government opposed it.

4.1%Reduction in allowable timber harvest from the proposed federal order, province-wide
Québec Chief Forester analysis of 15 July 2024; 1.4 million cubic metres a year.

Status As of July 2026: no emergency order found in the sources reviewed; an Ottawa–Québec agreement was reported but not independently verified.

What?
A proposed federal emergency order to protect three Québec caribou herds, which the Québec Chief Forester estimated would cut the allowable harvest by 4.1% province-wide. Noovo
Where?
Val-d'Or, Charlevoix and Pipmuacan caribou ranges, Québec, Canada. Noovo
When?
Process began June 2024; Chief Forester analysis 15 July 2024. Noovo
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
  • Forestry sector in Québec — At least 2,000 jobs forecast lost by the Québec government if the order went ahead.
Harmed
  • Val-d'Or and Charlevoix caribou herds — Nine and 30 animals respectively were kept in fenced enclosures.
Why?
The federal government began the process for three caribou herds; the Québec government cited forecast job losses in opposing it.
How?
A federal emergency order process, assessed through its effect on the allowable harvest. Noovo
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

In June 2024 the Canadian federal government began the process for an emergency order covering three caribou herds in Québec: Val-d'Or, Charlevoix and Pipmuacan. Animals in two of the herds were being kept in fenced enclosures: nine in Val-d'Or and 30 in Charlevoix.

On 15 July 2024 the Québec Chief Forester analysed the proposal. According to Noovo's report of 16 July 2024, the order would have reduced the allowable harvest by 1.4 million cubic metres a year, or 4.1% across the province: 790,400 cubic metres for Pipmuacan, 357,000 for Charlevoix and 245,900 for Val-d'Or.

The Québec government forecast the loss of at least 2,000 jobs and declined to take part in consultations.

The sources reviewed record no emergency order being issued. A July 2026 agreement between Ottawa and Québec was reported, but only (see unknown).

  1. 2024Federal government begins emergency-order process for three Québec caribou herds (June); Chief Forester analysis (15 July); Québec forecasts at least 2,000 job losses
  2. 2026Ottawa–Québec caribou agreement reported (July), not independently verified

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Should the federal emergency order go ahead for the three herds?
Government and regulators
Government of Canada

Began the emergency-order process for the Val-d'Or, Charlevoix and Pipmuacan herds in June 2024.

Noovo
Government and regulators
Québec Chief Forester

Estimated a cut of 1.4 million cubic metres a year in allowable harvest, 4.1% province-wide.

Noovo
Government and regulators
Government of Québec

Forecast at least 2,000 job losses and declined to take part in consultations.

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

    Recorded

    • The Chief Forester estimated the proposed order would reduce the allowable harvest by 1.4 million cubic metres a year, 4.1% province-wide.
    • Allowable-harvest reductions by herd: Pipmuacan 790,400 m³, Charlevoix 357,000 m³, Val-d'Or 245,900 m³.
    • Nine animals in Val-d'Or and 30 in Charlevoix were kept in fenced enclosures.
    • Québec forecast at least 2,000 job losses and declined to take part in consultations.

    Who gained

    Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

    Reached nature or the ground

    Not published
    No figure published.

    Gained elsewhere

    Not totalled
    Currency: CAD · Window: 2024–2026. All figures cover the same period. * Estimate built from cited figures.

    Responses on record

    • Government of Québec (2024): Forecast at least 2,000 job losses from the proposed federal order and declined to take part in consultations.
    • Government of Canada (June 2024): Began the emergency-order process for the Val-d'Or, Charlevoix and Pipmuacan herds in June 2024. · Noovo

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What nature saw

    Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

    Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

    Allowable harvest cut proposed
    4.1%
    1.4 million m³ a year province-wide (Chief Forester, 15 July 2024)
    Caribou held in fenced enclosures
    9 and 30
    Val-d'Or and Charlevoix herds
    Emergency order issued
    None in sources
    The sources reviewed record no issued order

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: No independent ecological evaluation is on record.
    • Disputed Should the federal emergency order go ahead for the three herds?

    Court

    Record

    • None on record The sources reviewed record no issued emergency order.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: in July 2026 Ottawa and Québec reached an agreement closing the dispute, with Ottawa giving Québec 25 million dollars over five years and Indigenous communities 15 million dollars (currency not stated); the source is a secondary summary.
    • Disputed Reported but not independently verified: in December 2020 the Québec government announced it had reached the 17% protection target by adding 257,000 square kilometres, mostly in the Grand Nord north of the 55th parallel; Noovo's report, environmental groups and Indigenous peoples' criticism of this, and Greenpeace's description of the target as reached at the last minute and of disputed reality, come.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: in 2025 the Québec government introduced Bill 97 dividing the forest into three zones, and Atikamekw and Innu communities blocked logging roads; the bill was withdrawn in September 2025.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: the Québec government described the federal intervention as unacceptable interference.

    Did the harm stop?

    The sources reviewed record no issued emergency order and no change in allowable harvest.

    Who paid?

    The sources reviewed do not state who bore the cost of the outcome; Québec forecast at least 2,000 job losses from the proposed order.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.

    Bonds and banking

    Guarantee
    A commitment by a third party, often a development bank, to pay if the borrower does not.