Cases / Waste management · Indonesia · 2018–2019
Indonesia returns 883 of 2,194 flagged waste containers
Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.
Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
- The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
Indonesia sent 883 of 2,194 flagged import containers back to their countries of origin, according to a 2019 report. Paper waste bales that reached East Java in 2018 were reported to hold 30–35% plastic, against a 2% legal limit.
What?
Indonesia sent 883 of 2,194 flagged containers back to their countries of origin. Hukumonline
Where?
East Java, Indonesia Tirto
When?
Paper imports in 2018; container returns reported in November 2019 Hukumonline
Who?
Gained
None on recordLost
None on recordHarmed
None on recordWhy?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Bales of paper waste held 30–35% plastic and household waste, against a 2% legal limit; containers were flagged and partly returned. Tirto
5 of 6 questions answered from the record · open: who
What happened
The record, in order.
Hukumonline reported in November 2019 that Indonesia had returned 883 of 2,194 flagged containers to their countries of origin.
Tirto reported that 738,665 tonnes of paper waste arrived in East Java in 2018, with plastic and household waste making up 30–35% of the bales.
Tirto put the legal limit for such contamination at 2%.
In court and with insurers
Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.
Lawsuits and rulings
No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.
Insurers
No insurer decision on record.
What we don't know
Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.
Nature
- Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.
Record
- Insufficient Reported but not verified: plastic in the bales is burned in tofu kilns, and eggs in the area had dioxin at 70 times the standard.
- Insufficient Reported but not verified: an inspection company said contamination was below 2%.
- Insufficient Reported but not verified: New Zealand's exports included 12,000 tonnes to Indonesia, and Indonesia returned three New Zealand containers.
- None on record The sources reviewed do not name who gained from the paper imports or who paid for cleanup.
Did the harm stop?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Who paid?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Sources
Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers
Press and investigations
- Pemerintah Reekspor Limbah ImporHukumonline · 2019-11
- Indonesia tertimbun sampah imporTirto · 2019
Connected cases
Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.
- EU Deforestation Regulation delays and trade pressure European Union · 2022
- Government of Indonesia (Government) — here: Government that returned the flagged containers; there: Led joint letters
- Indonesia reopened sea sand exports in 2023; Supreme Court annulled them in 2025 Indonesia · 2023–2025
- Government of Indonesia (Government) — here: Government that returned the flagged containers; there: issued PP 26/2023 and the export rules
- Indonesia reopens sea-sand exports on a 17.66 billion m3 potential estimate Indonesia · 2023
- Government of Indonesia (Government) — here: Government that returned the flagged containers; there: reopened sea-sand exports under PP 26/2023
- Indonesia's 2025 mining law change opens mining areas to religious groups without tender Indonesia · 2025
- Government of Indonesia (Government) — here: Government that returned the flagged containers; there: Lawmakers who passed the revision
- Indonesia's forest moratorium: ministry cited 38% less clearing, Greenpeace disputed it Indonesia · 2011–2019
- Government of Indonesia (Government) — here: Government that returned the flagged containers; there: imposed the moratorium; ministry reported the 38% figure
- Indonesia's H5N1 sample withholding and the WHO PIP Framework Indonesia · 2007–2026
- Government of Indonesia (Government) — here: Government that returned the flagged containers; there: Withheld H5N1 samples
- Indonesia's Nusantara capital faces funding gap as Jakarta keeps sinking Indonesia · 2019
- Government of Indonesia (Government) — here: Government that returned the flagged containers; there: Plans and funds the new capital
- Jakarta evictions, Ciliwung normalisation and the Giant Sea Wall Indonesia · 2014–2025
- Government of Indonesia (Government) — here: Government that returned the flagged containers; there: Central government; approved the Giant Sea Wall in 2025
- Papua food and energy estate (Indonesia) Indonesia · 2024
- Government of Indonesia (Government) — here: Government that returned the flagged containers; there: Declared the project a National Strategic Project
- Raja Ampat nickel licences revoked Indonesia · 2025
- Government of Indonesia (Government) — here: Government that returned the flagged containers; there: Revoked four of five nickel permits
- Rinca island work in Komodo National Park continued after UNESCO asked for a halt Indonesia · 2020–2021
- Government of Indonesia (Government) — here: Government that returned the flagged containers; there: runs the 10 New Balis tourism programme
- Trade rules curb green industrial policy; WTO rules against Indonesia nickel ban Global · 2013–2026
- Government of Indonesia (Government) — here: Government that returned the flagged containers; there: Respondent in the nickel export ban case; complainant in the palm oil case
- WTO panel backs EU on palm biofuel rules in Malaysia case Global · 2025
- Government of Indonesia (Government) — here: Government that returned the flagged containers; there: Complainant in the Indonesia case
- WTO panel found Indonesia's raw nickel export ban breached rules Indonesia · 2020–2022
- Government of Indonesia (Government) — here: Government that returned the flagged containers; there: Imposed the ban and appealed the panel ruling