Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Protected area / relocation · Indonesia · 2020–2021

Rinca island work in Komodo National Park continued after UNESCO asked for a halt

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
What the record lacks: 2 none on record · 1 not measured See the gaps

Construction on Rinca island in Komodo National Park began under Indonesia's '10 New Bali' tourism programme and continued after UNESCO asked for it to stop. The wildlife zone was reduced to a third, and the government reported a target of 500,000 visitors a year.

What?
Construction began on Rinca island under the '10 New Bali' tourism programme and continued after UNESCO asked for a halt in October 2020. AP (via Yahoo)
Where?
Rinca island, Komodo National Park, Indonesia AP (via Yahoo)
When?
UNESCO halt request in October 2020; AP report in December 2021 AP (via Yahoo)
Who?
Gained
  • Companies granted business permits under the 10 New Balis programme — named in the sources as beneficiaries AP (via Yahoo)
Lost
None on record
Harmed
  • Wildlife zone in Komodo National Park — reduced to a third AP (via Yahoo)
  • Local guides and boatmen — expressed concern about their livelihoods AP (via Yahoo)
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Tourism development under the '10 New Bali' programme, with the wildlife zone reduced and a 500,000-visitor target AP (via Yahoo)
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

Construction began on Rinca island under Indonesia's '10 New Bali' tourism programme, and UNESCO asked in October 2020 for it to stop, but work continued, according to AP (December 2021).

The wildlife zone was reduced to a third, and the government reported a target of 500,000 visitors a year.

Local guides and boatmen expressed concern about their livelihoods, according to the same report.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • None on record The sources reviewed do not say whether UNESCO's halt request was later complied with.
    • None on record The sources reviewed do not say how many people or livelihoods are affected by the reduction of the wildlife zone.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Press and investigations

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.