3M booked US$10.3bn charge for US public water PFAS settlement
Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.
- The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
3M recorded a pre-tax charge of US$10.3 billion in 2023 for its settlement with US public water suppliers over PFAS, chemicals that persist in the environment. Payments run to 2036.
- US public water suppliers — scheduled payments under the settlement, up to US$12.5 billion nominal through 2036 3M
What happened
3M recorded a pre-tax charge of US$10.3 billion for the settlement in the second quarter of 2023 (3M results release, 25 July 2023).
The charge is the present value, at a 5.2% discount rate, of US$12.5 billion nominal payable over 2024 to 2036, and it reduced earnings per share by US$14.19 (3M results release, 25 July 2023).
3M announced the settlement with public water suppliers in an April 2024 release (3M, 1 April 2024).
In court and with insurers
Lawsuits and rulings
- 2024-10–Outcome not on recordAIG v. 3M (PFAS and pollution coverage)Not stated in the sources reviewed · Civil · AIG → 3M
AIG sued 3M in late October 2024, citing policy language it said limits or bars coverage for PFAS and pollution claims. FOX 9
Insurers
What we don't know
Nature
- Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.
Court
- Unclear AIG v. 3M (PFAS and pollution coverage): outcome not on record.
Record
- Insufficient Reported but not verified: a court approved the settlement, under which 3M would pay US$10.5 to 12.5 billion through 2036.
- Insufficient Reported but not verified: the settlement is not an admission of liability, as 3M stated.
- None on record Not stated: how much of the quarter's total tax benefit of US$2.184 billion relates to the settlement.
- Insufficient Reported but not verified: a Delaware state court dispute between 3M and excess insurers, reported in a paywalled Law360 item that could not be read.
- None on record Not stated: whether any insurance recovery has been made, or whether the coverage disputes have been decided.
- None on record The sources reviewed disclose no insurance link for the 2018 Minnesota settlement.
Did the harm stop?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Who paid?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Sources
Company or project
- 3M reports second quarter 2023 results3M · 2023-07-25
- 3M settlement with public water suppliers to address PFAS3M · 2024-04-01
Press and investigations
- 3M PFAS lawsuits: AIGFOX 9 · 2024-10
Connected cases
- DuPont, Chemours and Corteva: PFAS cost-sharing and water-system settlement United States · 2015–2025 Related matter
- 3M PFOS: internal evidence, EPA penalty and Minnesota settlement United States · 1979–2026
- PFAS insurance disputes (3M, Chemours, DuPont) United States · 2020–2026
- 3M agrees to pay 571 million euros for Zwijndrecht PFOS clean-up Belgium · 2022–2023
- 3M (Company) — here: defendant; recorded the settlement charge; there: Company paying the settlement and appellant against the decree
- 3M agrees to pay US public water suppliers $10.3bn over PFAS United States · 2023
- 3M (Company) — here: defendant; recorded the settlement charge; there: company; settling party
- Appeals court overturns PFAS blood-contamination class action against 3M United States · 2023
- 3M (Company) — here: defendant; recorded the settlement charge; there: defendant named in the case
- Australian government settled PFAS claims at three defence bases and sued 3M Australia · 1988–2025
- 3M (Company) — here: defendant; recorded the settlement charge; there: defendant in the Commonwealth suit
- EACOP pipeline: insurers decline, construction continues Uganda / Tanzania · 2021–2026
- AIG (Insurer) — here: insurer that sued 3M over coverage; there: Named as still willing to insure (2024, 2025)
- Exxon Valdez: the spill, insurance and court cases United States · 1989–2015
- AIG (Insurer) — here: insurer that sued 3M over coverage; there: Participant in the excess programme
- Insurers of the Carmichael coal mine Australia · 2015–2025
- AIG (Insurer) — here: insurer that sued 3M over coverage; there: Not ruled out; insured on-ground works until 30 September 2019
- Monsanto/Bayer PCB and Roundup insurance suit v AIG United States · 1967–2026
- AIG (Insurer) — here: insurer that sued 3M over coverage; there: Insurer that declined cover; defendant
- New York appeals court sides with AIG units in PFAS coverage dispute United States · 1961–2022
- AIG (Insurer) — here: insurer that sued 3M over coverage; there: insurer whose units New Hampshire Insurance Co. and Granite State were defendants
- PCB pollution and the Monsanto Anniston settlement United States · 2002–2025
- AIG (Insurer) — here: insurer that sued 3M over coverage; there: Excess insurer; defendant in Bayer's suit over cover for PCB and Roundup settlements
- PFAS water utility settlements by 3M, DuPont, Chemours and Corteva United States · 2023–2036
- 3M (Company) — here: defendant; recorded the settlement charge; there: Defendant and settling party; PFAS manufacturer
- Roundup litigation, settlements and legal shield (Bayer/Monsanto) United States · 2009–2026
- AIG (Insurer) — here: insurer that sued 3M over coverage; there: Insurer that refused cover
- US tax deductibility of environmental settlements (IRC 162(f)) United States · 2017
- 3M (Company) — here: defendant; recorded the settlement charge; there: Company that booked a PFAS settlement charge