Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Agriculture, livestock and food · United Kingdom · 2016

Tesco fictional farm brands (UK)

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 2 none on record · 1 not measured · 1 disputed · 1 unclear See the gaps

In 2016 Tesco launched seven fictional farm brand names for its products. A farmers' union complained to Trading Standards; Tesco said the names denote a quality specification, not a farm.

7Fictional farm brands launched by Tesco
2016. Tesco states the brands appear in more than 70% of its customers' baskets (company statement).

Status As of July 2016 reporting: the National Farmers' Union complaint to Trading Standards was undecided; no later ruling found.

What?
Seven fictional farm brand names used on Tesco products in 2016. The Drum
Where?
United Kingdom. The Drum
When?
2016; complaint reported in July 2016. The Drum
Who?
Gained
  • Tesco — Sold products under farm-style names; says the brands appear in more than 70% of baskets. The Drum
Lost
None on record
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Brand names that are not working farms, on products some of which are imported; Tesco calls the names a quality specification. Food Manufacture
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

In 2016 Tesco launched seven fictional farm brands, among them Boswell and Woodside. The names are not those of working farms, and some of the products sold under them are imported.

In July 2016 the National Farmers' Union complained to Trading Standards about the brands, as reported by The Drum and Food Manufacture.

Tesco said the names are a quality specification, not a farm. It stated that the brands appear in more than 70% of baskets.

The complaint was left without a decision between the institutions concerned.

  1. 2016Tesco launches seven fictional farm brands; the National Farmers' Union complains to Trading Standards (July); no decision is recorded

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Do the fictional farm names misrepresent the origin of the products?
Communities and civil society
National Farmers' Union

Complained to Trading Standards about the brand names.

Food Manufacture
Company or project
Tesco

The names are a quality specification, not a farm.

The Drum
Government and regulators
Trading Standards and other institutions

No decision on the complaint is recorded in the sources reviewed.

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

  • Seven brands carrying farm names, such as Boswell and Woodside
    Tesco · The Drum
  • The brands appear in more than 70% of baskets
    Tesco (company statement) · The Drum

Recorded

  • The names do not belong to farms and some of the products are imported.
  • Tesco says the names are a quality specification, not a farm.
  • The farmers' union complaint was not decided between the institutions concerned.

Who gained

Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

Reached nature or the ground

Not published
No figure published.

Gained elsewhere

Not totalled
Currency: GBP · Window: 2016. All figures cover the same period. * Estimate built from cited figures.

Responses on record

  • tesco (July 2016): The names are a quality specification, not a farm; the brands appear in more than 70% of baskets. · The Drum

In court and with insurers

Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

Lawsuits and rulings

  1. 2016-07–Outcome not on record
    NFU complaint to Trading Standards over Tesco farm brands
    Trading Standards (complaint) · Regulatory · National Farmers' Union → Tesco

    The union complained about the use of fictional farm names; the complaint was left undecided between the institutions concerned. The Drum

Insurers

No insurer decision on record.

What nature saw

Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

Brands with fictional farm names
7
Tesco, 2016
Outcome of the complaint
Undecided
Not decided between the institutions concerned

What we don't know

Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

Nature

  • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

Court

  • Unclear NFU complaint to Trading Standards over Tesco farm brands: outcome not on record.

Accounts

  • Disputed Do the fictional farm names misrepresent the origin of the products?
  • None on record Trading Standards and other institutions: No decision on the complaint is recorded in the sources reviewed.

Record

  • None on record The complaint to Trading Standards was left without a decision between the institutions concerned.

Did the harm stop?

No change to the brands is recorded in the sources reviewed.

Who paid?

Not established in the sources reviewed; no harm to nature is recorded in this case.

Sources

Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

Connected cases

Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.