Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Agriculture, livestock and food · United Kingdom · 2024–2025

WWF-UK corporate income falls to GBP 10.6m as charity consults on 90 job cuts

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 3 none on record · 1 insufficient · 1 not measured See the gaps

WWF-UK's corporate income fell to GBP 10.6m in 2024-25 as partnerships with Tesco, HSBC, Reckitt and KPMG ended or shrank. In November 2025 the charity opened a consultation on 90 job cuts, about 20% of its staff, and the sources reviewed do not state the reason for the cuts.

What?
WWF-UK's corporate income fell to GBP 10.6m in 2024-25, and the charity opened a consultation on 90 job cuts in November 2025. Civil Society
Where?
United Kingdom Civil Society
When?
Financial year 2024-25; consultation on job cuts opened in November 2025 Civil Society
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
  • WWF-UK — Corporate income fell, and the Tesco, HSBC, Reckitt and KPMG partnerships ended or shrank Civil Society
  • WWF-UK staff — About 90 roles, about 20% of staff, were put into a consultation on job cuts in November 2025 Civil Society
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Several corporate partnerships ended or shrank over the year, and the charity then opened a consultation on job cuts. Civil Society
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

Civil Society reported that WWF-UK's total income was GBP 89.3m in 2024-25 and its corporate income was GBP 10.6m, a fall in corporate income.

Civil Society reported that the Tesco, HSBC, Reckitt and KPMG partnerships had ended or been scaled back, with GSK coming in instead.

Civil Society reported that the charity opened a consultation in November 2025 on 90 job cuts, about 20% of its staff.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: 2023-24 total income of GBP 92.5m, of which GBP 18.2m (about 20%) was corporate income, from the WWF-UK annual report summary of March 2025.
    • None on record The sources reviewed do not state why the partnerships ended or were scaled back, or whether the job cuts were caused by the fall in corporate income.
    • None on record The sources reviewed do not name the individual corporate donors behind the partnership income, or give the value of the GSK partnership.
    • None on record The sources reviewed do not say whether conservation programmes were affected by the cuts.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Press and investigations

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.