Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Protected area / relocation · Australia · 2015–2026

Reef 2050 Long-Term Sustainability Plan, Great Barrier Reef: funding announced, audit findings and outlook

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
More than; cumulative federal investment as announced 3 billion Australian dollars were pledged in my name. No one has measured what reached me.
Did nature suffer? Not measured. Accounts differ ↓
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 1 none on record · 1 insufficient · 1 not measured · 3 disputed · 2 unclear See the gaps
Accounts of the harm differ
How well the reef is managed

The Reef 2050 Long-Term Sustainability Plan for the Great Barrier Reef was backed in January 2022 by an announcement of A$1 billion over nine years that would lift federal Reef 2050 investment to more than A$3 billion. Press reports of the Reef Outlook Report 2024 give an overall outlook of "very poor"; the Australian National Audit Office found shortcomings in the advice behind the A$443.3 million grant to the Great Barrier Reef Foundation in 2019.

more than A$3 billionFederal Reef 2050 Plan investment after the January 2022 package
The Conversation, 27 January 2022: the Prime Minister announced A$1 billion over nine years that would lift federal Reef 2050 Plan investment to more than $3 billion. The figure is a pledged cumulative total as announced; no source reviewed states total spending.

Status As of May 2026: funding for the plan continues in the federal budget; the Outlook Report 2024 gave an overall outlook of very poor; total spending is not on record.

What?
The Reef 2050 Long-Term Sustainability Plan for the Great Barrier Reef, backed by funding announced in 2022 that lifts federal investment to more than A$3 billion. The Conversation
Where?
The Great Barrier Reef and its Queensland catchments. The Conversation
When?
ANAO audit reported 16 January 2019; A$1 billion announced 27 January 2022; Outlook Report 2024 reported 25 August 2024; federal budget 2026. The Conversation
Who?
Gained
Lost
None on record
Harmed
None on record
Why?
To protect and restore the reef, including through water quality improvement, reef management and resilience research. The Conversation
How?
Federal funding allocated to water quality, management and conservation, research and traditional owner projects, with delivery through agencies and the Reef Trust Partnership with the Foundation. The Conversation
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

On 27 January 2022 Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced A$1 billion over nine years for the Great Barrier Reef, which The Conversation reported would lift federal Reef 2050 Plan investment to more than A$3 billion. The package was divided into water quality (A$579.9 million), reef management and conservation (A$252.9 million), reef resilience research (A$92.7 million) and traditional owner and community-led projects (A$74.4 million). Morrison said the funding would "support scientists, farmers and traditional owners". At the time the World Heritage Committee was considering listing the reef "in danger" over climate change. In May 2026 Newsport reported that the federal budget included A$86.8 million over two years for reef restoration and implementing the Reef 2050 Long-term Sustainability Plan, about A$35 million over two years for the Marine Park Authority and about A$57 million over two years for protecting and restoring the Great Barrier Reef.

The federal government granted A$443.3 million to the Great Barrier Reef Foundation. The Guardian reported on 16 January 2019 that the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) found "insufficient scrutiny" of several aspects of the proposal, including the Foundation's past fundraising performance; that the department had "just 11 business days" to find a private partner and judged the Foundation the "obvious" choice after three days; that total administration costs "could be $86.41m"; and that no competitive tender was held. The ANAO made six recommendations. The Environment Minister, Melissa Price, said "None of the findings or recommendations affect the conclusion" that the partnership is effective; Labor's Tony Burke called the findings "damning". In May 2021 the Foundation said it agreed to, and had commenced implementing, all seven recommendations of a later ANAO report on the partnership, reported more than 200 projects underway and said 65 percent of the partnership funds, "$275 million", would be spent or under contract by mid-2021. The ANAO reports themselves were not opened; these accounts come from press and the Foundation.

The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) publishes the Outlook Report every five years. In August 2019 its chair, Ian Poiner, said "The overall outlook for the Great Barrier Reef is very poor"; Environment Minister Sussan Ley said she was not surprised and called the reef "the best managed reef in the world" (Associated Press). The Australian Marine Conservation Society reported on 25 August 2024 that the 2024 Outlook Report, covering January 2019 to December 2023, again gave an overall outlook of "very poor", the lowest rating; Poiner wrote that "Even with the recent management initiatives to reduce threats and improve resilience, the overall future outlook for the Great Barrier Reef is very poor." The report rated many protective actions as "mostly effective", climate change actions as "ineffective" and actions on water quality and fishing as "partially effective", and seagrass and coral cover improved. The Outlook Report pages themselves were not opened.

On water quality, the Australian Marine Conservation Society wrote on 30 May 2024, citing the Reef Water Quality Report Card, that fine sediment had been cut 16% against a target of 25% by 2025, and dissolved inorganic nitrogen cut 28.4% against a target of 60% by 2025 (2009 baseline). The society said it was "clear the water quality targets will be pushed back again, the third time since their inception". The report card itself and the government's account of progress were not opened.

  1. 2019ANAO audit of the A$443.3 million grant to the Great Barrier Reef Foundation reported (16 January); Outlook Report 2019 gives an overall outlook of very poor (30 August, press)
  2. 2021Foundation agrees to all seven recommendations of the ANAO report on the Reef Trust Partnership (5 May)
  3. 2022A$1 billion over nine years announced, lifting federal Reef 2050 investment to more than A$3 billion (27 January)
  4. 2024Reef water quality report card figures cited (30 May); Outlook Report 2024 gives an overall future outlook of very poor (reported 25 August)
  5. 2026Federal budget includes A$86.8 million over two years for restoration and implementing the Reef 2050 Plan (reported 21 May)

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

“support scientists, farmers and traditional owners”

Scott Morrison, then Prime Minister, on the A$1 billion package · 27 January 2022 · The Conversation

“None of the findings or recommendations affect the conclusion”

“the best managed reef in the world”

“Even with the recent management initiatives to reduce threats and improve resilience,”

Ian Poiner, chair of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, on the 2024 Outlook Report (as quoted by the Australian Marine Conservation Society) · 25 August 2024 · Australian Marine Conservation Society

“the overall future outlook for the Great Barrier Reef is very poor.”

Ian Poiner, chair of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, on the 2024 Outlook Report (as quoted by the Australian Marine Conservation Society) · 25 August 2024 · Australian Marine Conservation Society

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Whether the Foundation grant was properly assessed
Government and regulators
Australian National Audit Office (2019, as reported by the Guardian)

Insufficient scrutiny of several aspects of the proposal; guidelines lacked clear criteria; no competitive tender.

The Guardian (via Yahoo News Canada)
Government and regulators
Melissa Price, Environment Minister (2019)

None of the findings or recommendations affect the conclusion that the partnership is effective.

The Guardian (via Yahoo News Canada)
Communities and civil society
Labor opposition (Tony Burke, 2019)

Called the findings "damning" and said Labor would demand the return of remaining funds if elected.

The Guardian (via Yahoo News Canada)
How well the reef is managed
Government and regulators
Sussan Ley, Environment Minister (2019)

Called the reef "the best managed reef in the world".

Associated Press (via WJLA)
Government and regulators
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (2019 and 2024, as reported)

The overall outlook for the Reef is very poor.

Australian Marine Conservation Society
Communities and civil society
Australian Marine Conservation Society (2024)

The water quality targets will be missed and pushed back again.

Australian Marine Conservation Society

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

  • The A$1 billion package presented as protecting the reef and supporting tourism and hospitality operators and Queensland communities, lifting federal Reef 2050 investment to more than A$3 billion.
    Prime Minister Scott Morrison, as reported by The Conversation · The Conversation
  • The reef described as "the best managed reef in the world".
    Environment Minister Sussan Ley, as reported by Associated Press · Associated Press (via WJLA)

Recorded

  • The ANAO found insufficient scrutiny of several aspects of the A$443.3 million grant proposal, no competitive tender and administration costs that could be A$86.41 million (as reported by the Guardian).
  • Outlook Report 2019 and 2024: overall outlook very poor, the lowest rating; the 2024 report rated climate change actions ineffective and water quality actions partially effective (press and NGO reports).
  • Water quality report card as cited by AMCS (2024): fine sediment cut 16% against a 25% target for 2025; dissolved inorganic nitrogen cut 28.4% against a 60% target for 2025.
  • No source reviewed states total spending against the more than A$3 billion federal figure.

In nature's name

What was promised in nature's name, the money that moved, and what was measured.

Promised

  • “support scientists, farmers and traditional owners” — Scott Morrison, then Prime Minister, on the A$1 billion package (27 January 2022) The Conversation

Money moved in nature's name

WhatKindAmountPeriod
Federal Reef 2050 Plan investment after the January 2022 package
Australian government
The Conversation
Pledged3bn AUD estimateas announced January 2022
New federal funding package for the Great Barrier Reef
Australian government
The Conversation
Pledged1bn AUDnine years from 2022
Grant to the Great Barrier Reef Foundation
Australian government
The Guardian (via Yahoo News Canada)
Pledged443m AUDgrant reported on 16 January 2019
Federal budget funding for restoration and implementing the Reef 2050 Plan
Australian government
Newsport
Budget87m AUD2026 budget, two years

What was measured

Not measured

No source reviewed measures the reef's condition against the plan's own aims or attributes outcomes to the plan. The Outlook Reports of 2019 and 2024, as reported, rate the overall outlook very poor, with seagrass and coral cover improved in 2024; the report card figures cited by the Australian Marine Conservation Society (fine sediment cut 16% against a 25% target for 2025; dissolved inorganic nitrogen cut 28.4% against 60%) fall short of those targets, and the sources reviewed do not state how those targets relate to the plan. The sources reviewed are press, NGO and Foundation pages; the report card and Outlook Report pages were not opened.

Fine sediment reduction against the 2025 target
16% (target 25%)
Reef Water Quality Report Card as cited by the Australian Marine Conservation Society, 30 May 2024 Australian Marine Conservation Society
Dissolved inorganic nitrogen reduction against the 2025 target
28.4% (target 60%)
As cited by the Australian Marine Conservation Society; 2009 baseline Australian Marine Conservation Society
Overall outlook for the Reef
Very poor (2019 and 2024)
Outlook Reports as reported by Associated Press and the Australian Marine Conservation Society Australian Marine Conservation Society

Operation Ongoing · Funding for the plan continues in the 2026 federal budget. Newsport

Findings on record

  • Official audit Australian National Audit Office (as reported by the Guardian) (2019-01-16) · Audit of the award of the A$443.3 million grant to the Great Barrier Reef Foundation: “insufficient scrutiny” The Guardian (via Yahoo News Canada)
  • Official audit Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Outlook Report 2019 (as reported by Associated Press) (2019-08-30) · Great Barrier Reef Outlook Report 2019: “The overall outlook for the Great Barrier Reef is very poor.” Associated Press (via WJLA)
  • Official audit Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Outlook Report 2024 (as quoted by the Australian Marine Conservation Society) (2024-08) · Great Barrier Reef Outlook Report 2024: “the overall future outlook for the Great Barrier Reef is very poor.” Australian Marine Conservation Society

Who gained

Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

Reached nature or the ground

Not published
No figure published.

Gained elsewhere

Not totalled
Currency: AUD · Window: Mixed — see each line. Figures cover different periods and are not compared as a ratio. * Estimate built from cited figures.

Responses on record

  • Australian government (16 January 2019; 27 January 2022): Prime Minister Morrison said the A$1 billion package would support scientists, farmers and traditional owners; Environment Minister Price said in 2019 that none of the ANAO findings or recommendations affect the conclusion that the Foundation partnership is effective. · The Guardian (via Yahoo News Canada)
  • Great Barrier Reef Foundation (5 May 2021): Said it agreed to, and had commenced the implementation of, all seven recommendations in the ANAO report on the Reef Trust Partnership and that more than 200 projects were underway. · Great Barrier Reef Foundation
  • Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (August 2024): Its chair said that even with recent management initiatives the overall future outlook for the Great Barrier Reef is very poor (as quoted by the Australian Marine Conservation Society). · Australian Marine Conservation Society

In court and with insurers

Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

Lawsuits and rulings

No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

Insurers

No insurer decision on record.

What nature saw

Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

Overall outlook for the Reef, Outlook Report 2024
Very poor
Lowest rating, as reported by the Australian Marine Conservation Society; period January 2019 to December 2023
Fine sediment reduction against the 2025 target
16% (target 25%)
Reef Water Quality Report Card as cited by AMCS, 2024
Dissolved inorganic nitrogen reduction against the 2025 target
28.4% (target 60%)
Reef Water Quality Report Card as cited by AMCS, 2024; 2009 baseline
Seagrass and coral cover
Improved
Outlook Report 2024 as reported by AMCS

What we don't know

Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

Nature

  • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.
  • Disputed How well the reef is managed

Accounts

  • Disputed Whether the Foundation grant was properly assessed

Record

  • Unclear None on record: total spending against the more than A$3 billion federal figure in the sources reviewed.
  • Unclear Unclear: the scope of the "more than $3 billion" figure. The Conversation reports it as federal Reef 2050 Plan investment after the January 2022 package; the pages of the government and the Marine Park Authority were not opened.
  • Insufficient Insufficient: primary access to the ANAO audit reports and the Outlook Report; the findings above come from press, NGO and Foundation pages.
  • Disputed Disputed: whether management is effective. Minister Ley called the reef the best managed reef in the world in 2019; the Outlook Reports of 2019 and 2024 give an overall outlook of very poor, and the 2024 report rates climate change actions ineffective.
  • None on record Not yet determined: whether the 2025 water quality targets were met; the figures cited are for progress to 2022 and the targets were reported as pushed back.

Did the harm stop?

The sources reviewed do not report that harm to the reef has stopped. The Outlook Report 2024, as reported, rated the overall future outlook very poor and climate change actions ineffective, though seagrass and coral cover improved over the reporting period.

Who paid?

Public funds. The Prime Minister's January 2022 announcement put federal Reef 2050 Plan investment at more than A$3 billion after a new A$1 billion over nine years. The A$443.3 million grant to the Great Barrier Reef Foundation was a federal grant.

Sources

Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations✓ Communities and civil society— Researchers

Communities and civil society

  1. Foundation welcomes recommendations (media release)
    Great Barrier Reef Foundation · 2021-05-05

Connected cases

Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.

Carbon and conservation finance

Baseline
The projected scenario of what would have happened without a project, such as an expected rate of deforestation. Credits are issued for the difference between the baseline and what actually happened, so an inflated baseline produces more credits.
Agriculture, livestock and food · Water use · Chemical pollution · Protected area / relocation · Netherlands · 1990–2026
Dutch nitrogen crisis and farm buyouts
Same type: Water use, Protected area / relocationHarm to nature disputedHarm to nature not measured
Protected area / relocation · Water use · Kenya · 2014–2024
Sengwer evictions from Embobut forest and the EU Water Towers programme (Kenya)
Same type: Protected area / relocation, Water useHarm to nature disputedHarm to nature not measured
Urban greening and displacement · Protected area / relocation · Water use · India · 2015–2024
Chennai water-body restoration evictions and Perumbakkam resettlement
Same type: Protected area / relocation, Water useHarm to nature disputedHarm to nature not measured
Protected area / relocation · Water use · Uzbekistan · 2024–2026
Sea Breeze resort on the Charvak reservoir, Uzbekistan
Same type: Protected area / relocation, Water useHarm to nature disputedHarm to nature not measured
Carbon credits · Biodiversity offset / offset credit · Protected area / relocation · Water use · United States · 1988–2026
US compensatory mitigation and conservation banking under the "no net loss" policy
Same type: Protected area / relocation, Water useHarm to nature disputedHarm to nature not measured
Insurance, liability and compensation funds · Protected area / relocation · Water use · Global · 1991–2026
Global Environment Facility Trust Fund: replenishments and independent evaluation
Same type: Protected area / relocation, Water useHarm to nature disputedHarm to nature not measured