Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Actors / Court · United States

US Supreme Court

Appears in 6 cases in this database. Roles as given in the documented record.

CaseRoleCountryPeriodInstrument
Exxon Valdez: the spill, insurance and court casesCut punitive damages to $507.5m (2008)United States1989–2015Oil spill
Removal of the Endangered Species Act 'harm' definitionUpheld the definition in 1995 (Sweet Home); decided Loper Bright in 2024United States2025–2026Law, regulation and treaties
Chevron, Texaco and the Lago Agrio judgment: the RICO ruling and the Donziger casesDeclined review of the contempt conviction (March 2023)Ecuador1995–2026Oil spill
Roundup litigation, settlements and legal shield (Bayer/Monsanto)Decided Monsanto v. DurnellUnited States2009–2026Pesticides and agrochemicals
US Supreme Court blocks state cancer-warning suits against pesticide makersRuled on the preemption questionUnited States2026Pesticides and agrochemicals
Monsanto/Bayer PCB and Roundup insurance suit v AIGDecided Monsanto v. Durnell, 7–2United States1967–2026Pesticides and agrochemicals

Law and courts

Punitive damages
Money a court orders a defendant to pay to punish especially reckless conduct, on top of compensation for losses. Mainly used in US courts.