Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Tree planting · United States · 1987–2004

US Northwest federal logging limits and the shift of timber cutting

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
What the record lacks: 1 none on record · 5 insufficient · 1 not measured · 1 disputed See the gaps

Federal logging on Pacific Northwest forests fell from 12.7 billion board-feet in 1987 to 1.7 billion in 2002. A 2019 letter by Brian Murray confirms an earlier finding that more than 80% of the blocked volume moved to other North American forests, mainly the US South.

What?
Federal logging on Pacific Northwest forests fell from 1987 to 2002, and more than 80% of the blocked volume was reported to have moved to other North American forests. Pacific Forest Trust
Where?
Federal forests of Oregon and Washington (Northwest Forest Plan area); blocked volume moved to other North American forests, mainly the US South Pacific Forest Trust
When?
1987 to 2004 (harvest decline and mill closures)
Who?
Gained
  • Large forest companies and southeastern private landowners — moved cutting to private land, Canada and overseas; the 13 southeastern states came to supply two-thirds of the national harvest, and private-land cutting from Virginia to Texas doubled since the late 1970s
Lost
  • Small forest towns in the Northwest — more than 200 mills closed and wood-products employment in Oregon and Washington fell 30%
Harmed
  • Natural forests of the US South — the sources say pine plantation replaced them as cutting moved south
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Federal logging restrictions on Northwest federal lands, with cutting moving to private land, Canada and overseas Pacific Forest Trust
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

Federal timber harvest on national forests fell from 12.7 billion board-feet in 1987 to 1.7 billion in 2002, according to figures cited from the Seattle Times.

More than 200 Northwest lumber mills closed between 1989 and 2004, and wood-products employment in Oregon and Washington fell 30%, according to the same figures.

Wear and Murray (2004) estimated that more than 80% of the blocked volume shifted to other North American forests, largely the US South; Brian Murray's 2019 letter confirms the finding.

Murray's letter adds that southern forests store less carbon, so carbon leakage was smaller than volume leakage; another model put carbon leakage below 10% in the Northwest and at 20–30% in the South.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: the 1994 Northwest Forest Plan cut logging by 80% across about 24 million acres.
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: the spotted owl was listed as threatened in 1990, and court rulings that followed nearly stopped federal logging.
    • Disputed Reported but not verified: old-growth remaining at the time of the decision was disputed; the Forest Service found 4.3 million acres in 1991 and the Wilderness Society 2 million, while conservation groups say only 15–20% of native old growth remains.
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: 30,000 direct jobs were lost in 1990–2000 according to a Forest Service report, about 19,000 of them before 1994; only about 400 of the 11,000 losses after 1994 were linked to lower federal logging.
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: Weyerhaeuser and other large private owners gained from the shift in cutting.
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: the spotted owl population kept falling because of invasive barred owls.
    • None on record Not reviewed: the full 2004 Wear and Murray paper; the 80% figure comes from Murray's 2019 letter.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts— Press and investigations✓ Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Communities and civil society

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.