Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Water use · United States · 2018

Michigan allows Nestlé to take up to 576,000 gallons of groundwater a day

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 2 none on record · 1 not measured See the gaps

In 2018 Michigan approved a Nestlé groundwater withdrawal of up to 576,000 gallons a day for an annual fee of $200, despite more than 80,000 public comments against it. The case concerns the low price of groundwater and the effect of pumping on local waterways.

What?
Michigan approved a Nestlé groundwater withdrawal of up to 576,000 gallons a day in 2018. WAMC/NPR
Where?
Michigan, United States WAMC/NPR
When?
April 2018 (approval reported) WAMC/NPR
Who?
Gained
  • Nestlé — groundwater withdrawal for an annual fee of $200 WAMC/NPR
Lost
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
A state permit allowed groundwater pumping at a set daily volume for an annual fee. WAMC/NPR
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

WAMC and NPR reported in April 2018 that Michigan approved Nestlé taking up to 576,000 gallons of water a day, for an annual fee of $200, despite more than 80,000 public comments against it.

WOOD-TV reported in 2018 on the withdrawal and its annual fee of $200.

The Michigan Environmental Council reported a 2003 court finding that pumping lowered a creek, and a later pact that cut a Mecosta County withdrawal from 400 to 218 gallons a minute.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • None on record Not stated in the sources reviewed: whether the 2003 court finding and the later pact concern the 2018 permit.
    • None on record Not stated in the sources reviewed: the aquifer, well locations, or the permit's status after 2018.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations✓ Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Communities and civil society

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.

    Science and environment

    Groundwater
    Water held underground in soil and rock, drawn through wells.