Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Oil, gas and coal operations · Indonesia · 2006–2020

Lapindo mud flow (Sidoarjo, Indonesia)

Nature's voice · report
Hot mud came up beside a gas well in 2006 and swallowed twelve villages.
Did nature suffer? Yes. Harm is on record. Disputed
Recorded
  • The mud was still flowing in the twentieth year.
People
  • 13 people died.
    Gas pipeline explosion under the mud dike, 22 November 2006; most were soldiers.
What the record lacks: 4 none on record · 1 insufficient · 3 disputed See the gaps
Accounts of the harm differ
What triggered the mud eruption?
  • Company or project Lapindo Brantas: Said the Yogyakarta earthquake two days earlier triggered it.
  • Government and regulators State Audit Agency (BPK): Counted many rule violations in the drilling in 2007.
  • Courts Supreme Court of Indonesia: Called it a natural disaster in April 2009 and saw no compensation liability.
  • Researchers Scientists (as described in the sources reviewed): The cause, drilling or earthquake, is a matter of scientific debate.

A mud eruption beside a gas well drilled by Lapindo Brantas in East Java began in 2006, swallowed twelve villages and was still flowing in its twentieth year. In 2009 the Supreme Court saw no compensation liability and police closed their investigation for lack of evidence; in 2015 the state lent the company money to pay compensation.

5 billion of 773 billion rupiah estimateRepaid by 2019 against a 2015 state loan to the company
As reported by Kontan; figures are the sources' own, not an estimate.

Status As of December 2020: the government was considering new options to collect the company's debt; the sources reviewed record no later settlement.

What?
Hot mud erupted beside a gas well drilled by Lapindo Brantas in Sidoarjo from 2006 and swallowed twelve villages.
Where?
Sidoarjo, East Java, Indonesia.
When?
From 2006; still flowing in the twentieth year.
Who?
Gained
  • Bakrie family companies — Lapindo was sold for $2 to a Bakrie-owned Jersey company; by 2019 the company had repaid 5 billion rupiah of a 773 billion rupiah state loan. Kontan
Lost
  • Residents of twelve villages — Villages swallowed by the mud.
  • State budget — Lent 773 billion rupiah to the company in 2015 and carries a claim of 1.91 trillion rupiah. Kontan
Harmed
  • 13 people killed in the pipeline explosion — Died on 22 November 2006, most of them soldiers sent to reinforce the dike.
Why?
The cause, drilling or earthquake, is disputed.
How?
Hot mud flowed from beside a gas well during drilling by Lapindo Brantas.
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

In 2006 hot mud began to flow beside a gas well drilled by Lapindo Brantas in Sidoarjo, East Java. The mud swallowed twelve villages and was still flowing in the twentieth year. Lapindo Brantas belonged to the Bakrie family. Aburizal Bakrie was at the time Coordinating Minister for People's Welfare and later became chair of the Golkar party.

On 22 November 2006 a gas pipeline under the dike holding back the mud exploded. Thirteen people died, most of them soldiers sent to reinforce the dike. The sources reviewed record no crime name for the deaths and no prosecution for them.

The company's first account was that the Yogyakarta earthquake two days earlier had triggered the eruption. In 2007 the State Audit Agency (BPK) counted many rule violations in the drilling. In 2008 the government declared the event a natural disaster. In April 2009 the Supreme Court again called it a natural disaster and saw no compensation liability. In August 2009 police closed the file on 13 suspects, including a director general, for insufficient evidence. The cause, drilling or earthquake, remains a matter of scientific debate in the sources reviewed.

Four months after the eruption, Lapindo was sold for $2 to a Jersey-registered company owned by the Bakrie family. A government decree divided the affected area: Lapindo was to pay inside the core area and the state outside it. When Lapindo could not complete its payments, the Finance Ministry opened a loan to the company in 2015 of 773 billion rupiah, and victims were paid from it. By 2019 the company had repaid 5 billion rupiah. The State Audit Agency's claim was put at 1.91 trillion rupiah, and the company proposed to settle the rest with physical assets.

Television channels owned by the Bakrie family, TVOne and ANTV, called the event the 'Sidoarjo mud' rather than the Lapindo mud. Research from ISEAS (2022) and a statement from Universitas Gadjah Mada describe this naming as a framing that moved the company's name out of the coverage.

  1. 2006Mud begins to flow beside the Lapindo Brantas gas well; on 22 November a gas pipeline under the dike explodes and 13 people die
  2. 2007State Audit Agency (BPK) counts many rule violations in the drilling
  3. 2008Government declares the event a natural disaster
  4. 2009Supreme Court calls it a natural disaster (April) and sees no compensation liability; police close the investigation of 13 suspects for insufficient evidence (August)
  5. 2015Finance Ministry opens a state loan of 773 billion rupiah to Lapindo to pay victims
  6. 2019Company has repaid 5 billion rupiah of the loan
  7. 2020Government considers new options to collect the debt (Jakarta Post, December)

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

What triggered the mud eruption?
Company or project
Lapindo Brantas

Said the Yogyakarta earthquake two days earlier triggered it.

Government and regulators
State Audit Agency (BPK)

Counted many rule violations in the drilling in 2007.

Courts
Supreme Court of Indonesia

Called it a natural disaster in April 2009 and saw no compensation liability.

Researchers
Scientists (as described in the sources reviewed)

The cause, drilling or earthquake, is a matter of scientific debate.

Should the event be called the Lapindo mud or the Sidoarjo mud?
Press and investigations
TVOne and ANTV (Bakrie family)

Named the event after the place, the Sidoarjo mud.

ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute (ISEAS Perspective)
Researchers
ISEAS (2022)

Describes the naming as part of a Lapindo framing in the Indonesian media.

ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute (ISEAS Perspective)
Researchers
Universitas Gadjah Mada (editorial board statement)

Described media affiliation with political parties as producing politically coloured reporting, and gave the Lapindo and Sidoarjo naming as an example.

Universitas Gadjah Mada
Who pays for compensation and how much of the state loan has been repaid?
Government and regulators
Finance Ministry and State Audit Agency

Lent 773 billion rupiah in 2015 and put its claim at 1.91 trillion rupiah.

Kontan
Press and investigations
Kontan

Reported that Lapindo had repaid 5 billion rupiah to the government.

Kontan
Company or project
Lapindo Brantas

Proposed to cover the remainder with physical assets.

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

  • The eruption was triggered by the Yogyakarta earthquake two days earlier, and was a natural disaster.
    Lapindo Brantas; later the government (2008) and the Supreme Court (2009)
  • The event was named for the place, 'Sidoarjo mud', rather than for the company.
    TVOne and ANTV (owned by the Bakrie family) · ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute (ISEAS Perspective)

Recorded

  • 13 people died on 22 November 2006 when a gas pipeline under the mud dike exploded; most were soldiers sent to strengthen the dike.
  • The State Audit Agency counted many rule violations in the drilling in 2007.
  • Police closed the file on 13 suspects, including a director general, in August 2009 for insufficient evidence.
  • The state loan to the company was 773 billion rupiah in 2015; 5 billion rupiah had been repaid by 2019.

Who gained

Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

Reached nature or the ground

Not published
No figure published.

Gained elsewhere

Not totalled
Currency: IDR · Window: 2015–2019. All figures cover the same period. * Estimate built from cited figures.

Responses on record

  • Lapindo Brantas (2006): Said the eruption was triggered by the Yogyakarta earthquake two days earlier.
  • Government of Indonesia (2008): Declared the event a natural disaster by government decision.
  • Lapindo Brantas (2019–2020): Proposed to settle the remaining debt with physical assets.

In court and with insurers

Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

Lawsuits and rulings

  1. 2009-04Defendant won
    Supreme Court ruling on the mud eruption
    Supreme Court of Indonesia · Civil · Not stated in the sources reviewed → Lapindo Brantas

    The Supreme Court again called the eruption a natural disaster and saw no compensation liability.

  2. 2009-08Dismissed
    Police investigation of 13 suspects
    Indonesian police · Criminal · State (police investigation) → 13 suspects, including a director general

    Police closed the file for insufficient evidence. No one was prosecuted.

Insurers

No insurer decision on record.

What nature saw

Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

Villages swallowed by mud
12
Still flowing in the twentieth year
Independent ecological evaluation
None in the record
No assessment of harm to nature is in the sources reviewed

What we don't know

Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

Nature

  • Disputed What triggered the mud eruption?

Accounts

  • Disputed Should the event be called the Lapindo mud or the Sidoarjo mud?
  • Disputed Who pays for compensation and how much of the state loan has been repaid?

Record

  • None on record The cause of the eruption, drilling or earthquake, is described as a matter of scientific debate.
  • None on record The outcome of Walhi's application to the anti-corruption commission is not on record.
  • Insufficient The loan outstanding is reported as 773 billion rupiah in one source and as 781 billion rupiah in another that was not independently verified.
  • None on record What became of the state's collection of the debt after December 2020, and of the company's offer to settle the remainder with physical assets, is not on record.
  • None on record No prosecution is on record for the 13 deaths.

Did the harm stop?

The mud was still flowing in the twentieth year.

Who paid?

The state paid compensation outside the core area and lent the company money for the rest, and 5 billion rupiah of the 773 billion rupiah loan had been repaid by 2019.

Sources

Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society✓ Researchers