Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Tree planting · Cameroon · 2002

Dutch timber firm Koninklijke Wijma penalised in Cameroon in 2002

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 1 none on record · 1 insufficient · 1 not measured See the gaps

Koninklijke Wijma, a timber company based in Kampen, was penalised in January 2002 for felling protected species and small-diameter trees in Cameroon. Greenpeace said it found Wijma-stamped logs outside the company's permit area.

What?
Koninklijke Wijma was penalised in Cameroon in January 2002 for felling protected species and small-diameter trees, a penalty of 1,836,415 CFA francs. Greenpeace Netherlands
Where?
Cameroon; Greenpeace found logs outside the company's permit area Greenpeace Netherlands
When?
January 2002 (penalty); 2002 (Greenpeace NL record) Greenpeace Netherlands
Who?
Gained
Lost
  • Protected tree species and small-diameter trees in Cameroon — felled; the company was penalised for it Greenpeace Netherlands
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Logging under timber felling concessions, with logs stamped by the company found outside its permit area. Greenpeace Netherlands
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

Koninklijke Wijma, a timber company based in Kampen, held timber felling concessions in Cameroon, according to the sources reviewed.

In January 2002 Koninklijke Wijma was penalised for felling protected species and small-diameter trees; the penalty was 1,836,415 CFA francs, according to Greenpeace NL's 2002 record.

Greenpeace reported that it found Wijma-stamped logs 5 km outside the company's permit area.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: the Dutch state was a major customer of Koninklijke Wijma.
    • None on record What the sources do not say: whether the company still holds concessions in Cameroon, or whether there was any penalty after 2002.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts— Press and investigations✓ Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Communities and civil society

    1. Greenpeace NL report on Wijma (2002)
      Greenpeace Netherlands · 2002