Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Conservation money

Green claim

22 cases in 14 countries, 2007–2025. Most cases: United Kingdom (8), United States (3), Italy (2), Australia (2), EU (2).

Green claim · Italy · 2025

Italian and French authorities act on Shein's environmental claims (2025)

On 3 July 2025 the French consumer authority DGCCRF announced a EUR 40 million fine for Shein's operator, accepted in a settlement with the Paris prosecutor, over misleading price-reduction and environmental claims. On 4 August 2025 the Italian competition authority announced a EUR 1,000,000 fine on Infinite Styles Services Co. Ltd over misleading and omissive environmental claims, in a decision taken on 29 July 2025.

€1 million
Fine set by the Italian competition authority (AGCM), decision of 29 July 2025
Claim ruled misleadingBenefit not measured
Green claim · United Kingdom · 2024

UK competition authority accepts undertakings from ASOS, Boohoo and George at Asda on green claims (2024)

On 27 March 2024 the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) announced that ASOS, Boohoo and George at Asda had signed formal undertakings to use only accurate and clear green claims, after an investigation opened in July 2022. The undertakings were given voluntarily and without any admission of wrongdoing or liability.

Undertakings accepted from three fashion retailers
CMA outcome, 27 March 2024
Benefit not measured
Lobbying, PR and greenwashing · Germany · 2023–2026

German courts bar 'CO2-neutral' and 'klimaneutral' advertising by five companies in cases brought by Deutsche Umwelthilfe (2023-2026)

Between March 2023 and July 2026 courts in Düsseldorf, Karlsruhe and Cologne ruled against climate-neutral or offset advertising by TotalEnergies Wärme & Kraftstoff Deutschland, dm, Eurowings, ZG Raiffeisen Energie and Lufthansa, in cases brought by Deutsche Umwelthilfe. The Cologne Higher Regional Court dismissed Eurowings' appeal on 13 December 2024 and, on 8 July 2026, left only one Lufthansa statement barred after the claimant waived the other.

TotalEnergies Wärme & Kraftstoff Deutschland, dm, Eurowings, ZG Raiffeisen Energie, Lufthansa
Rulings recorded in the series
Claim ruled misleadingBenefit not measured
Lobbying, PR and greenwashing · United Kingdom · 2023

UK Advertising Standards Authority upholds complaints about Shell, Repsol and Petronas transition advertisements (7 June 2023)

On 7 June 2023 the UK Advertising Standards Authority ruled on advertisements by Shell UK Ltd, Repsol SA and Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas). It found that each advertisement omitted material information and was misleading or likely to mislead.

Ads must not appear again
UK ASA rulings on Shell, Repsol and Petronas advertisements
Lobbying, PR and greenwashing · United Kingdom · 2023

UK Advertising Standards Authority upholds complaints about two Etihad environmental advertisements (12 April and 6 December 2023)

The UK Advertising Standards Authority ruled twice on Etihad Airways advertisements in 2023. On 12 April it concluded that the "sustainable aviation" claim exaggerated the impact that flying with Etihad would have on the environment; on 6 December it concluded that a Google search ad gave a misleading impression of Etihad's environmental impact.

Two rulings upheld
UK ASA rulings on Etihad advertisements
Law, regulation and treaties · United Kingdom · 2023

UK Advertising Standards Authority upholds complaint about Lufthansa "Fly more sustainably" Google ad (6 December 2023)

On 6 December 2023 the UK Advertising Standards Authority ruled that a Lufthansa paid Google ad with the claim "Fly more sustainably" (A23-1206007) gave a misleading impression of Lufthansa's environmental impact because the basis of the claim was not made clear.

Ad must not appear again
UK ASA ruling on Lufthansa "Fly more sustainably"
Green claim · United States · 2022

FTC and Justice Department seek penalties from Kohl's and Walmart over "bamboo" textile claims (United States, 2022)

On 8 April 2022 the US Federal Trade Commission announced that the Department of Justice had filed complaints and proposed consent orders against Kohl's and Walmart over rayon textiles marketed as bamboo, with penalties of $2.5 million for Kohl's and $3 million for Walmart. The orders take effect once a district court judge approves and signs them.

$2.5 million (Kohl's) and $3 million (Walmart)
Penalties sought by the FTC and DOJ, 8 April 2022
Benefit not measured
Green claim · Netherlands · 2022

Dutch consumer authority obtains commitments from H&M ("Conscious") and Decathlon ("Ecodesign") (2022)

On 13 September 2022 the Dutch consumer authority (ACM) announced binding commitments from H&M and Decathlon, decided on 19 August 2022, over sustainability claims it described as unclear and insufficiently substantiated. It imposed no sanctions; Decathlon committed to a donation of EUR 400,000 and H&M to EUR 500,000, and ACM will enforce the commitments over two years.

€500,000 (H&M) and €400,000 (Decathlon)
Donations under the binding commitments, announced 13 September 2022
Benefit not measured
Agriculture, livestock and food · Norway · 2022

Norwegian Consumer Authority finds Norrøna's use of Higg MSI data in organic cotton marketing misleading and prohibited (2022)

In a letter of 14 June 2022 the Norwegian Consumer Authority concluded that Norrøna's use of Higg MSI data to market the environmental benefits of organic cotton t-shirts was misleading and prohibited, and asked Norrøna to change or remove it by 14 August 2022. On 27 June 2022 the Sustainable Apparel Coalition said it was pausing consumer-facing use of Higg data.

14 June 2022
Letter of the Norwegian Consumer Authority (case nr 21/14987-26)
Claim ruled misleadingBenefit not measured
Carbon credits · Qatar · 2022–2025

FIFA's "carbon-neutral" claim for the 2022 Qatar World Cup: Swiss Commission for Fairness upholds five complaints (2023)

On 7 June 2023 the Swiss Commission for Fairness (SLK) announced that it had upheld all five complaints, from Switzerland, France, Belgium, the UK and the Netherlands, against FIFA's claims that the 2022 World Cup in Qatar was climate- or carbon-neutral, and recommended that FIFA stop making them. It found FIFA had not proved the claims accurate. The SLK's press release states that the decision is legally binding; Reuters reported that the commission issues recommendations, not state-enforceable judgments.

3.63 million tonnes of CO2
Emissions FIFA's ex-ante report put at the 2022 World Cup (provisional figure)
Claim ruled misleadingBenefit not measured
Law, regulation and treaties · United Kingdom · 2022

UK Advertising Standards Authority upholds complaints about Innocent "Little drinks with big dreams for a healthier planet" advertisements (23 February 2022)

On 23 February 2022 the UK Advertising Standards Authority ruled that three Innocent advertisements (television and video on demand) were misleading because they implied that buying Innocent products was a choice which would have a positive environmental impact when that was not the case.

Ads must not appear again
UK ASA ruling on Innocent "Little drinks with big dreams"
Agriculture, livestock and food · United Kingdom · 2022

UK Advertising Standards Authority upholds complaints about Tesco Plant Chef "even better for the planet" advertisements (8 June 2022)

On 8 June 2022 the UK Advertising Standards Authority ruled on six Tesco Plant Chef advertisements (171 complaints). It found that Tesco held no evidence on the full lifecycle of any Plant Chef product and that the claims were not substantiated and were likely to mislead.

Ads must not appear again
UK ASA ruling on Tesco Plant Chef
Law, regulation and treaties · United Kingdom · 2022

UK Advertising Standards Authority upholds complaint about Unilever Persil "kinder to our planet" television advertisement (31 August 2022)

On 31 August 2022 the UK Advertising Standards Authority ruled that a Persil television advertisement with the on-screen text "TOUGH ON STAINS, KINDER TO OUR PLANET" was likely to mislead, because Unilever held no evidence of the products' full life-cycle environmental impact compared with earlier formulations or other products.

Ad must not appear again
UK ASA ruling on Unilever Persil
Carbon credits · Australia · 2021–2023

ASIC infringement notices to Tlou Energy and Black Mountain Energy over carbon-neutral, low-emissions and net-zero statements (2022-2023)

Australia's securities regulator ASIC said that Tlou Energy paid A$53,280 to comply with four infringement notices (media release of 27 October 2022) and that Black Mountain Energy paid A$39,960 to comply with three (media release of 5 January 2023), over sustainability-related statements made to the ASX. ASIC stated that payment of an infringement notice is not an admission of guilt or liability.

A$53,280
Amount Tlou Energy paid to comply with four ASIC infringement notices
Benefit not measured
Law, regulation and treaties · Italy · 2021–2022

Gorizia court grants Alcantara an interim injunction against Miko's "100% recyclable" and "eco-friendly" claims for Dinamica microfibre (2021); Miko says the order was later revoked

The Gorizia court granted competitor Alcantara an interim injunction in November 2021 against Miko's green claims for its "Dinamica" microfibre and ordered the ruling published on Miko's website. Reports describe it as the first precautionary greenwashing order of an ordinary Italian court. Miko stated that a new panel of the court later accepted its complaint and revoked the order.

Interim injunction, publication order and a monetary penalty
Court order on green claims for Dinamica microfibre
Claim ruled misleadingBenefit not measured
Law, regulation and treaties · Denmark · 2020–2024

Danish courts find Danish Crown's "Klimakontrolleret gris" label breached the Marketing Practices Act (2024)

On 1 March 2024 the Western High Court (Vestre Landsret) ruled that Danish Crown's "Klimakontrolleret gris" label breached the Marketing Practices Act and did not find the slogan "Dansk gris er mere klimavenlig, end du tror" misleading. On 12 April 2024 Danish Crown told the Supreme Court (Højesteret) that it accepted that both statements breached the Act and accepted a ban; press reports say the Supreme Court ruled in line with that acceptance on 23 July 2024.

Breach of the Marketing Practices Act
Court ruling on the label
Claim ruled misleadingOwn admission
Law, regulation and treaties · United Kingdom · 2020

UK Advertising Standards Authority upholds complaints about Ryanair "lowest emissions airline" advertisements (5 February 2020)

On 5 February 2020 the UK Advertising Standards Authority ruled that Ryanair press, television and radio advertisements claiming "Europe's … Lowest Emissions Airline" and "low CO2 emissions" were misleading, after 167 complaints.

Ads must not appear again
UK ASA ruling on Ryanair "lowest emissions airline" claim
Law, regulation and treaties · Sweden · 2019–2023

Swedish court bans Arla's "netto noll klimatavtryck" claim for organic dairy products (2023)

The Patent and Market Court of the Stockholm District Court ruled on 2 February 2023, in a case brought by the Consumer Ombudsman, that Arla's "netto noll klimatavtryck" (net zero climate footprint) claim on its Arla Ko Eko products was misleading, because the promised effect would be reached only after 100 years. It banned the claim under a fine of SEK 1,000,000 and ordered Arla to pay the Consumer Ombudsman's costs of SEK 354,855.

SEK 1,000,000
Fine attached to the ban
Claim ruled misleadingBenefit not measured
Finance, funds and markets · Global · 2018–2026

Sustainable-labelled funds: assets, renaming under the EU fund-name rules, fees and impact studies

Funds with an environmental, sustainability or impact claim held USD 3.901 trillion at the end of 2025, according to Morningstar. After the EU fund-name guidelines, 65% of funds named in the 25 largest EU managers' notices changed name, ESMA reported, and peer-reviewed studies found little effect of such funds on company behaviour.

USD 3.901 trillion
Assets of funds with an ESG, sustainability or impact claim, end of 2025
Court ruling existsOfficial audit finding
Green claim · European Union · 2014–2022

EU budget 2014–2020: climate spending reported by the Commission and the European Court of Auditors' finding

The European Commission reported €216 billion, 20.1% of the 2014–2020 EU budget, as climate spending. In Special Report 09/2022 the European Court of Auditors said the Commission had overstated climate spending by at least €72 billion and that around 13% of the budget was spent on climate action.

€216 billion (20.1% of the EU budget)
Climate spending reported by the Commission, 2014–2020
Official audit findingBenefit not measured
Finance, funds and markets · United States · 2011–2021

Mantria and DC Solar: two US investment schemes sold on carbon-negative housing, biochar and solar generators

Mantria raised $54.5m from investors on a carbon-negative housing and biochar offer; its founder was sentenced to 22 years in August 2019. DC Solar sold mobile solar generators, many of which did not exist, in a scheme of about $1bn; its owner was sentenced to 30 years in November 2021.

$54.5m
Raised from investors by Mantria on a carbon-negative housing and biochar offer
Court ruling existsBenefit not measured
Tree planting · Brazil · 2007–2026

Vale Florestar, the Carajás railway and Piquiá de Baixo, Brazil

Vale's Vale Florestar programme planted eucalyptus and native species in Pará and became a R$605 million investment fund in 2010, whose quotas Suzano bought in 2014 for R$528,940,906.15. Beside the railway that carries Vale's iron ore, residents of Piquiá de Baixo reported decades of pollution from pig-iron plants; no court has ruled on liability, and 312 houses were handed over at a new site in 2024.

R$605 million
Vale Florestar investment fund, as announced on 5 May 2010
Official audit findingBenefit not measured

All cases, with filters →