Swedish court bans Arla's "netto noll klimatavtryck" claim for organic dairy products (2023)
Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.
- Stockholm Patent and Market Court (Patent- och marknadsdomstolen) found that a claim made in my name was misleading. The claim was: “"netto noll klimatavtryck" (net zero climate footprint) on organic dairy products, offset through purchased climate credits” Stockholms tingsrätt, Patent- och marknadsdomstolen (judgment, copy hosted by Forbrukertilsynet, Norway)
- The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
The Patent and Market Court of the Stockholm District Court ruled on 2 February 2023, in a case brought by the Consumer Ombudsman, that Arla's "netto noll klimatavtryck" (net zero climate footprint) claim on its Arla Ko Eko products was misleading, because the promised effect would be reached only after 100 years. It banned the claim under a fine of SEK 1,000,000 and ordered Arla to pay the Consumer Ombudsman's costs of SEK 354,855.
Stockholm Patent and Market Court, PMT 17372-21, 2 February 2023: a fine payable if Arla repeats the claim. Arla was also ordered to pay the Consumer Ombudsman's legal costs of SEK 354,855.
Status As of 2 February 2023: ban and fine ordered and costs awarded to the Consumer Ombudsman; no later development found.
- Arla — Claim banned under a SEK 1,000,000 fine; ordered to pay SEK 354,855 in costs; stopped using the claim during the proceedings; said offsetting would be phased out at year-end 2022 Stockholms tingsrätt, Patent- och marknadsdomstolen (judgment, copy hosted by Forbrukertilsynet, Norway)
What happened
From summer 2019 until spring 2022 Arla Foods AB (Arla), a farmer-owned cooperative, marketed products in its Arla Ko Eko organic range in Sweden with the claim "netto noll klimatavtryck" (net zero climate footprint). On the older pack, used until about week 37 of 2020, the text said that all remaining greenhouse-gas emissions were balanced by carbon-binding activities such as planting and protecting forest, which made the product climate neutral. On the newer pack the text said that all climate emissions from cow to consumer were offset in full through the purchase of climate credits from, for example, tree-planting projects.
According to the judgment, Arla had bought climate credits in the Bujang Raba forest-conservation project in Indonesia and the Trees for Global Benefit tree-planting project in Uganda, both certified by Plan Vivo, and in the African Biogas Partnership Programme, certified by Gold Standard, with about one third of its offsetting in each. In its calculation, which the judgment records as Arla's, the greenhouse-gas emissions of the Arla Ko Eko range in 2018 were 158,427,000 kg CO2e.
In a case brought by the Consumer Ombudsman (Konsumentombudsmannen), the court ruled on 2 February 2023 that the marketing was misleading under section 10 and unfair under section 8 of the Swedish Marketing Act. It found that the calculations aimed at a result to be reached only after 100 years, that the average consumer could not be expected to understand this, and that on a cursory reading the claim could be understood only to mean that the product did not affect the climate at all or that its climate impact had been fully compensated. It held that Arla had not shown with sufficient strength that the marketing was reliable. The court banned Arla, under a fine of SEK 1,000,000, from using the claim "netto noll klimatavtryck" or similar claims in marketing dairy products, and ordered Arla to pay the Consumer Ombudsman's legal costs of SEK 354,855 plus interest. In setting the fine the court noted that Arla had stopped using the marketing during the proceedings.
Dagens PS reported on 21 November 2022 that Arla was stopping the offsetting of its products ahead of the trial and had earlier in the year stopped using the claim; Arla's sustainability manager said the company had run the campaign "by the book". LandbrugsAvisen, citing SVT, quoted her on 22 November 2022 saying that the offsetting for the Arla Ko Eko range would be phased out at year-end as other climate and sustainability measures were moved closer to Arla's own operations. For a Danish complaint over an Arla "CO2e-neutral" claim, no final outcome was found.
- 2019Summer: Arla starts using the "netto noll klimatavtryck" claim on Arla Ko Eko packs (marketing ran until spring 2022, according to the court)
- 202221-22 November: reports that Arla is stopping the offsetting of the Arla Ko Eko range, ahead of the trial
- 20232 February: Patent and Market Court rules in PMT 17372-21 that the marketing was misleading; ban under a SEK 1,000,000 fine; Arla to pay the Consumer Ombudsman's costs of SEK 354,855
What was said
“Marknadsföringen har således varit vilseledande enligt 10 § marknadsföringslagen och även otillbörlig enligt 8 § samma lag.”
Where accounts differ
Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.
Claimed that the marketing was misleading and contrary to good marketing practice.
Stockholms tingsrätt, Patent- och marknadsdomstolen (judgment, copy hosted by Forbrukertilsynet, Norway)Argued that the claim was not misleading.
Stockholms tingsrätt, Patent- och marknadsdomstolen (judgment, copy hosted by Forbrukertilsynet, Norway)Found the marketing misleading under section 10 and unfair under section 8 of the Marketing Act.
Stockholms tingsrätt, Patent- och marknadsdomstolen (judgment, copy hosted by Forbrukertilsynet, Norway)How it looked
Shown
- Arla Ko Eko dairy products presented with "netto noll klimatavtryck" (net zero climate footprint), described on the packs as offset in full through climate credits or balanced by carbon-binding activities.
Recorded
- The court found that the average consumer could not be expected to understand that the promised effect would be reached only after 100 years, and that the claim was misleading under section 10 and unfair under section 8 of the Marketing Act (2 February 2023).
- The court banned Arla, under a fine of SEK 1,000,000, from using the claim "netto noll klimatavtryck" or similar claims when marketing dairy products; Arla was ordered to pay the Consumer Ombudsman's costs of SEK 354,855, of which SEK 249,466 is legal fees, plus interest.
- The court noted that Arla had stopped using the marketing during the proceedings.
- Arla said the offsetting for the Arla Ko Eko range would be phased out at year-end 2022 (as quoted by LandbrugsAvisen).
In nature's name
Promised
- “"netto noll klimatavtryck" (net zero climate footprint) on organic dairy products, offset through purchased climate credits” — Arla (2019-07) Stockholms tingsrätt, Patent- och marknadsdomstolen (judgment, copy hosted by Forbrukertilsynet, Norway)
Money moved in nature's name
| What | Kind | Amount | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fine attached to the ban Arla Stockholms tingsrätt, Patent- och marknadsdomstolen (judgment, copy hosted by Forbrukertilsynet, Norway) | Penalty | 1m SEK | 2 Feb 2023 |
| Consumer Ombudsman's legal costs Arla Stockholms tingsrätt, Patent- och marknadsdomstolen (judgment, copy hosted by Forbrukertilsynet, Norway) | Compensation | 0.35m SEK | 2 Feb 2023 |
What was measured
No independent measurement of the climate effect of the credits behind the claim is on record. Arla's own emissions calculation is recorded in the judgment as Arla's. The ruling concerns whether the claim was reliable and how consumers would understand it.
Findings on record
- Court or regulator ruling Stockholm Patent and Market Court (Patent- och marknadsdomstolen) (2023-02-02) · PMT 17372-21, Konsumentombudsmannen v Arla Foods AB: “Marknadsföringen har således varit vilseledande enligt 10 § marknadsföringslagen” original in Swedish Stockholms tingsrätt, Patent- och marknadsdomstolen (judgment, copy hosted by Forbrukertilsynet, Norway)
Who gained
Reached nature or the ground
Gained elsewhere
Responses on record
- arla (2023-02-02): Disputed the Consumer Ombudsman's claim in court, arguing that the claim "netto noll klimatavtryck" was not misleading. · Stockholms tingsrätt, Patent- och marknadsdomstolen (judgment, copy hosted by Forbrukertilsynet, Norway)
- arla (2022-11-21): Its sustainability manager said the company had run the campaign "by the book"; the offsetting for the Arla Ko Eko range would be phased out at year-end 2022. · Dagens PS
In court and with insurers
Lawsuits and rulings
- 2023-02-02Claimant wonSEK 1000bn Fine attached to the ban, payable if the claim is repeatedConsumer Ombudsman v Arla ("netto noll klimatavtryck")Stockholm Patent and Market Court, PMT 17372-21 · Civil · Consumer Ombudsman (Konsumentombudsmannen) → Arla Foods AB
The court found the marketing misleading and unfair and banned Arla, under a fine of SEK 1,000,000, from using the claim or similar claims in marketing dairy products; Arla to pay the Consumer Ombudsman's costs of SEK 354,855. Stockholms tingsrätt, Patent- och marknadsdomstolen (judgment, copy hosted by Forbrukertilsynet, Norway)
Insurers
What we don't know
Nature
- Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.
Accounts
- Disputed Whether the claim "netto noll klimatavtryck" was misleading
Record
- None on record No final outcome found for a Danish complaint over an Arla "CO2e-neutral" claim.
- None on record The sources reviewed do not say whether Arla appealed the judgment.
- None on record None on record: an independent measurement of the climate effect of the credits behind the claim.
Did the harm stop?
Arla stopped using the claim during the proceedings, according to the court, and said the offsetting for the Arla Ko Eko range would be phased out at year-end 2022; the court issued a ban.
Who paid?
A fine of SEK 1,000,000 is payable if the claim is repeated; Arla was ordered to pay the Consumer Ombudsman's costs of SEK 354,855 plus interest.
Sources
Courts
- DOM, Patent- och marknadsdomstolen, mål nr PMT 17372-21 (Konsumentombudsmannen mot Arla Foods AB)Stockholms tingsrätt, Patent- och marknadsdomstolen (judgment, copy hosted by Forbrukertilsynet, Norway) · 2023-02-02
Press and investigations
- Efter kritikstorm – Arla slutar klimatkompenseraDagens PS · 2022-11-21
- Arla stopper klimakompensation i Sverige efter kritik om vildledningLandbrugsAvisen (citing SVT) · 2022-11-22
Connected cases
- Arla denies Gates link to Bovaer cattle feed additive pilot in UK United Kingdom · 2024
- Arla (Company) — here: Defendant; used the "netto noll klimatavtryck" claim; there: Ran the UK pilot; denied the Gates link