Yangtze ten-year fishing ban
- My wild fish catch fell from about 430,000 tonnes in 1954 to under 100,000 tonnes after 2011.
- About 70% of the decline of my river's fish is attributed to habitat loss — dams, land reclamation and sand mining — and about 30% to fishing. PubMed Central
- My Chinese sturgeon have not spawned naturally for eight years.
About 231,000 fishers put down their nets. Studies attribute about 70% of the river's fish loss to habitat destruction, mostly dams, sand mining and land reclamation.
Jin et al., attribution study.
- China Yangtze Power (operator of six main-stem dams) — Net profit rose from 26.3bn yuan in 2020 to 34.5bn yuan in 2025; the dams were not part of the ban. Stock Analysis
- Aquaculture in the Yangtze provinces — Hubei's aquaculture output was worth 157.7bn yuan in 2022, about 5.8 times the total ban compensation (estimate).
- Fishers — About 231,000 stopped fishing. One reported fisher's income fell from 50,000–80,000 yuan to about 24,000 a year as a patrol warden. Sixth Tone
- Baiji, the Yangtze river dolphin — Declared functionally extinct in 2007; fishing nets were its main recorded cause of death.
- The river's wild fish — Wild catch fell from about 430,000 tonnes in 1954 to under 100,000 tonnes after 2011.
- Chinese sturgeon — No natural spawning for eight years; more than 970,000 juveniles released in 2025.
What happened
China banned fishing on the Yangtze in two steps: from 1 January 2020 in 332 protected areas of the basin, and from 1 January 2021 on the main stem and major tributaries. The ban runs for ten years.
About 231,000 fishers and 111,000 boats came under the ban. Central and local governments set aside 27 billion yuan by the end of 2022 for compensation and pension insurance.
Research attributes about 70% of the river's fish decline to habitat loss — dams, land reclamation and sand mining — and about 30% to fishing.
The river's dolphin, the baiji, was not found in a 2006 survey and was declared functionally extinct in 2007. Fishing nets were its main recorded cause of death. The ban came fourteen years later.
China Yangtze Power, which runs six large dams on the river including Three Gorges, raised net profit from 26.3 billion yuan in 2020 to 34.5 billion yuan in 2025. Cargo handled at main-stem ports passed 4.2 billion tonnes in 2025.
- 1954Wild catch about 430,000 tonnes
- 2006Baiji not found in survey; declared functionally extinct (2007)
- 2011Wild catch below 100,000 tonnes
- 2020Ban begins in 332 protected areas
- 2021Ban extends to main stem and major tributaries
- 2025Yangtze finless porpoise count 1,426; dam power output 307 TWh
- 2030Ten-year ban period ends
What was said
“Fishers able and willing to work, all placed in jobs.”
“China starts 10-year fishing ban on Yangtze River.”
Where accounts differ
Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.
“Fishers able and willing to work, all placed in jobs.”
gov.cnOne fisher's income fell from 50,000–80,000 yuan a year to about 24,000 as a patrol warden.
None on record measures how much lost income the compensation replaced.
How it looked
Shown
- A ten-year rest for the river
- 231,000 fishers compensated and retrained
- Porpoise numbers rising
- Fish biomass up
Recorded
- About 70% of fish loss attributed to habitat, about 30% to fishing
- The dams keep running; dam operator profit up about 3× from 2015 to 2025
- The baiji was gone 14 years before the ban
- One reported fisher: from 50–80,000 yuan a year to about 24,000 as a patrol warden
Who gained
Reached nature or the ground
Gained elsewhere
In court and with insurers
Lawsuits and rulings
Insurers
What nature saw
Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.
What we don't know
Court
- None on record No court case on record.
Accounts
- Disputed Were the fishers' livelihoods replaced?
- None on record National study: None on record measures how much lost income the compensation replaced.
Record
- None on record No national study measures how much of fishers' lost income the compensation replaced.
- None on record The number of fishers "able and willing to work" fell from 160,000 (2022) to 142,000 (2025); no reason was given.
- None on record No official figure for total legal and illegal sand extraction on the river.
- None on record No current official count of dams in the basin.
Did the harm stop?
Fishing stopped in 2020–21. Habitat loss, named as the larger cause, was not part of the ban.
Who paid?
Fishers, many moving to lower incomes; the baiji, before any ban existed.
Sources
Company or project
- China Yangtze Power income statementStock Analysis · 2026
Government and regulators
- Ministry update on fishers' resettlementgov.cn · 2025-12
Press and investigations
- China starts 10-year fishing ban on Yangtze RiverChina Daily · 2020-01-02
- Fishers and boats handed in under the banSixth Tone · 2020
- Poyang Lake sand miningSixth Tone · 2017
Researchers
- Fish biomass recovery in the Yangtze (Science, 2026)Chinese Academy of Sciences · 2026-02-13
- Causes of fish decline in the Yangtze (Jin et al.)PubMed Central · 2022
Connected cases
- China is building a mega dam in Tibet, upstream of India and Bangladesh China · 2024
- Government of China (Government) — here: Regulator; ban and compensation; there: Building the dam, per Radio Free Asia
- China's natural forest logging ban and the shift of timber imports China · 1998–2014
- Government of China (Government) — here: Regulator; ban and compensation; there: introduced the 1998 logging restrictions and the natural-forest logging ban
- Fengyun-1C anti-satellite test China · 2007–2026
- Government of China (Government) — here: Regulator; ban and compensation; there: State that conducted the test
- Fukushima treated water discharge and Chinese seafood ban Japan · 2023–2025
- Government of China (Government) — here: Regulator; ban and compensation; there: Banned Japanese seafood imports
- Human Rights Watch reports about 930,000 relocated in Tibet for ecological protection China · 2024
- Government of China (Government) — here: Regulator; ban and compensation; there: authority that carried out the relocations, as reported
- Mekong upstream dams and the decline of Tonle Sap flow reversal Cambodia · 1962–2026
- Government of China (Government) — here: Regulator; ban and compensation; there: Operator of the upper Mekong (Lancang) dams; rejected the 2019 low-flow attribution
- Non-peer-reviewed study links China's 1958 sparrow campaign to famine deaths China · 1958–1960
- Government of China (Government) — here: Regulator; ban and compensation; there: ran the Four Pests campaign
- World Bank-backed dams displaced people, and reviews found incomes often not restored Global · 1985–2018
- Government of China (Government) — here: Regulator; ban and compensation; there: Host government for the Three Gorges dam