Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Lobbying, PR and greenwashing · United States · 2021–2026

Texas anti-ESG law SB 13 and the states' suit against BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 2 none on record · 1 not measured · 3 disputed · 1 unclear See the gaps

In 2021 Texas passed SB 13, which blacklists financial institutions that boycott fossil-fuel companies. In November 2024 Texas and other states sued BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street, alleging they coordinated through climate initiatives to curb coal production; Vanguard settled in February 2026 for $29.5 million without admitting wrongdoing.

$29.5 millionVanguard's settlement payment in the states' coal antitrust suit
Paid in February 2026 without admission of wrongdoing; the research file says the allegations were unproven.

Status As of October 2026: Vanguard settled the states' coal antitrust suit in February 2026 for $29.5 million; the suit against BlackRock and State Street was listed as ongoing; SB 13 was found unconstitutional on 4 February 2026, and an objection to that ruling was listed as ongoing.

What?
Texas passed SB 13 in 2021 to blacklist financial institutions that boycott fossil-fuel companies; the state's school fund withdrew $8.5 billion from BlackRock in 2024; Texas and other states sued BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street in November 2024 over alleged coordination to curb coal production; Vanguard settled in February 2026. ESG Today
Where?
Texas, United States. Ballotpedia News
When?
From 2021 to 2026. ESG Dive
Who?
Gained
  • BlackRock — Removed from the Texas list on 3 June 2025 after leaving the climate initiatives. Texas Tribune
Lost
  • Vanguard — Paid $29.5 million in settlement without admitting wrongdoing. ESG Dive
  • BlackRock — Lost management of $8.5 billion of Texas school-fund assets in March 2024. Ballotpedia News
  • Texas municipalities — Estimated at $303–532 million of extra interest in eight months (Garrett and Ivanov; disputed).
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Backers presented the campaign as a defence of energy workers and retirees' money against 'woke capitalism'; the states' stated claim in the suit is that the firms coordinated to curb coal production.
How?
A state blacklist law (SB 13), a state fund withdrawal, and a multi-state antitrust suit. ESG Today
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

In 2021 Texas enacted SB 13, which blacklists financial institutions that 'boycott' fossil-fuel companies. Laws that took effect in September 2021 barred banks that restricted the fossil-fuel and firearms industries from acting as municipal bond underwriters. The claim that the model text for the law came from the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is described in the sources reviewed as disputed. Backers presented the campaign as a defence of energy workers and retirees' money against 'woke capitalism'.

In 2022 Garrett and Ivanov estimated that Texas municipalities would pay $303–532 million in extra interest on $32 billion of bonds issued in the first eight months of the laws, after five banks holding about 35% of the market withdrew. Authors aligned with the industry dispute the calculation. In August 2022, after a July ALEC meeting, 19 state attorneys general wrote to BlackRock; in 2023, 165 anti-ESG bills were introduced in 37 states.

In February 2024 JPMorgan Asset Management, State Street and PIMCO left the investor initiative Climate Action 100+, and BlackRock moved its membership to its international unit. On 19 March 2024 the Texas Permanent School Fund withdrew $8.5 billion from BlackRock. In November 2024 Texas and other states sued BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street, alleging that the three firms cooperated through climate initiatives to curb coal production.

Between December 2024 and January 2025 six large US banks left the Net Zero Banking Alliance and BlackRock left the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative, which was suspended. On 3 June 2025 Texas removed BlackRock from its list after it had left the climate initiatives. In August 2025 Judge Kernodle allowed most of the states' case to continue and noted that there was no direct evidence of a conspiracy.

On 4 February 2026 Judge Albright found SB 13 unconstitutional. In February 2026 Vanguard paid $29.5 million without admitting wrongdoing and committed to remain passive, leaving the suit. The Net Zero Asset Managers initiative relaunched, without an explicit reference to 2050, and its US member count fell from 44 to 12. The suit continued against BlackRock and State Street, and an objection to the SB 13 ruling was listed as ongoing in the sources reviewed.

  1. 2021Texas enacts SB 13; laws barring restricted banks from municipal bond underwriting take effect in September
  2. 2022Garrett and Ivanov estimate $303–532 million of extra interest on Texas municipal bonds in eight months; July ALEC meeting; August letter from 19 attorneys general to BlackRock
  3. 2023165 anti-ESG bills introduced in 37 states
  4. 2024Feb: JPMorgan AM, State Street and PIMCO leave Climate Action 100+. 19 Mar: Texas school fund withdraws $8.5 billion from BlackRock. Nov: Texas and other states sue BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street.
  5. 2025Jan: BlackRock leaves Net Zero Asset Managers. 3 Jun: BlackRock removed from the Texas list. Aug: judge lets most of the antitrust case proceed. 3 Oct: Net Zero Banking Alliance closes. 30 Oct: NZAM announces relaunch without the 2050 requirement.
  6. 20264 Feb: SB 13 found unconstitutional. Feb: Vanguard pays $29.5 million and leaves the suit; NZAM returns with 253 signatories.

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Did BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street coordinate through climate initiatives to curb coal production?
Government and regulators
Texas and other states

Alleged the three firms cooperated through climate initiatives to curb coal production.

ESG Today
Courts
Judge Kernodle (August 2025)

Allowed most of the case to proceed and noted there was no direct evidence of a conspiracy.

ESG Dive
Company or project
Vanguard

Settled in February 2026 for $29.5 million without admitting wrongdoing.

ESG Dive
Company or project
State Street

No statement in the source sources reviewed.

What did the Texas bond-underwriting restrictions cost municipalities?
Researchers
Garrett and Ivanov

Estimated $303–532 million in extra interest on $32 billion of bonds in the first eight months, after five banks holding about 35% of the market withdrew.

Researchers
Authors aligned with the industry

Dispute this calculation.

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

  • The campaign was presented as a defence of the energy worker and the retiree's money against 'woke capitalism'.
    Campaign backers, as described in the sources reviewed

Recorded

  • Texas withdrew $8.5 billion in school-fund assets from BlackRock on 19 March 2024.
  • BlackRock was removed from Texas's list on 3 June 2025 after it left the climate initiatives.
  • Texas and other states' suit against BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street survived a motion to dismiss in August 2025; the judge noted there was no direct evidence of a conspiracy.
  • Vanguard settled in February 2026 for $29.5 million without admitting wrongdoing and committed to remain passive.
  • BlackRock's support for environmental and social shareholder proposals fell from 47% in 2021 to 4% in 2024 and to about 1% in 2025 (3 of 352 proposals); Vanguard's support was 0% in three consecutive proxy seasons (2023–24, 2024–25, 2025–26).
  • Consumers' Research, a face of the campaign, received about $10 million in grants from the Marble Freedom Trust in 2021–23.
  • In 2025, 106 anti-ESG bills were introduced and 11 became law; since 2021, 52 laws and resolutions have passed in 21 states.

Who gained

Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

Reached nature or the ground

Not published
No figure published.

Gained elsewhere

Not totalled
Vanguard settlement payment, February 2026$30m
Texas school-fund assets withdrawn from BlackRock, March 2024$8.5bn
Estimated extra interest paid by Texas municipalities in the first eight months (Garrett and Ivanov; disputed)$532m
Range 303–532 million dollars on $32 billion of bonds.
Currency: USD · Window: 2021–2026. All figures cover the same period. * Estimate built from cited figures.

Responses on record

  • vanguard (2026-02): Settled the states' antitrust suit for $29.5 million without admitting wrongdoing and committed to remain passive. · ESG Dive
  • blackrock (2025-01): Left the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative in January 2025 and moved its Climate Action 100+ membership to its international unit in February 2024; the sources reviewed give no statement by BlackRock on the suit.
  • texas-gov (2025-06-03): Removed BlackRock from its list on 3 June 2025 after BlackRock left the climate initiatives; the state's school fund withdrew $8.5 billion from BlackRock on 19 March 2024. · Texas Tribune

In court and with insurers

Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

Lawsuits and rulings

  1. 2024-11–Ongoing
    Texas and other states v. BlackRock, Inc., Vanguard and State Street (coal antitrust suit)
    US court in Texas (Judge Kernodle) · Civil · Texas and 12 other states → BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street

    The states allege the three firms cooperated through climate initiatives to curb coal production. In August 2025 the judge denied most of the motion to dismiss and noted there was no direct evidence of a conspiracy. ESG Today

  2. 2024-11–2026-02Settled$29500bn Paid by Vanguard without admission of wrongdoing
    Vanguard settlement in the states' coal antitrust suit
    US court in Texas · Civil · Texas and 12 other states → Vanguard

    Vanguard paid $29.5 million without admitting wrongdoing and committed to remain passive. ESG Dive

  3. 2026-02-04Claimant won
    Challenge to Texas SB 13
    Court identified only as Judge Albright's in the sources reviewed · Civil · → State of Texas (SB 13)

    Judge Albright found SB 13 unconstitutional on 4 February 2026. An objection to the ruling was listed as ongoing.

Insurers

No insurer decision on record.

What nature saw

Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

Fossil-fuel holdings, Vanguard (2023)
$269 bn
NGO study (Urgewald and others), via ai-CIO
Fossil-fuel holdings, BlackRock (2023)
$263 bn
NGO study (Urgewald and others), via ai-CIO
Support for environmental and social shareholder proposals, BlackRock
47% (2021) to about 1% (2025)
Calendar years; 3 of 352 proposals in 2025

What we don't know

Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

Nature

  • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

Accounts

  • Disputed Did BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street coordinate through climate initiatives to curb coal production?
  • Disputed What did the Texas bond-underwriting restrictions cost municipalities?
  • None on record State Street: No statement in the source sources reviewed.

Record

  • None on record The states' coordination allegations were not tested at trial; the judge noted no direct evidence of conspiracy in August 2025, and the research file describes the allegations as unproven.
  • Unclear Whether the model text for SB 13 originated with ALEC is described as disputed.
  • Disputed The Garrett and Ivanov estimate of extra municipal interest is disputed by industry-aligned authors.

Did the harm stop?

No ecological harm is recorded in the sources reviewed for this case.

Who paid?

Vanguard paid $29.5 million in settlement. Texas municipalities were estimated to pay $303–532 million in extra interest in the first eight months (Garrett and Ivanov; disputed). Texas's school fund moved $8.5 billion out of BlackRock.

Sources

Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators✓ Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

Courts

Connected cases

Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.

Carbon and conservation finance

ESG
Environmental, social and governance criteria that investors and insurers use to screen companies and projects.

Insurance

Underwriter
An insurer, or a person at an insurer, who assesses a risk and decides whether and on what terms to insure it.