Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 30 — For every dollar the world invests in protecting or restoring nature, thirty dollars are spent on activities that degrade it. (UNEP, State of Finance for Nature 2026)
Cases / Water use · United States · 2000–2026

Salton Sea Management Program and the Species Conservation Habitat project, California

Nature's voice · report
The exposed playa I leave behind is covered in dust containing selenium and arsenic from the farm runoff that fed me, the Legislative Analyst's Office wrote.
Did nature suffer? Yes. Harm is on record. Accounts differ ↓
In my name
Recorded
  • A USC study found 24% of 722 children near me had asthma, and dust events were linked to more wheezing in children within 7 miles. USC News
  • A University of California, Irvine study of nearly 500 children from 2019 to 2022 linked higher dust exposure to lower lung function. University of California, Irvine
  • My surface stood at -243.8 feet on 25 July 2026. Pacific Institute
Details not on record: 2 none on record · 1 self-reported only · 1 not measured · 3 disputed · 2 unclear See the gaps
Accounts of the harm differ
How much dust the projects suppress and whether suppression is the right response
  • Government and regulators California Natural Resources Agency: Air quality monitoring shows dust suppression of 75 to 90 percent in project areas. KESQ
  • Researchers Pacific Institute (2025): The only multi-year estimates put lakebed emissions at "less than one percent of total dust emissions in the region"; suppression at the source alone is not sufficient, politically feasible or cost-effective. Pacific Institute
  • Press and investigations inewsource, reporting the Pacific Institute study: Preliminary estimates suggest the state's dust suppression projects reduced dust by 75% in the areas covered; the state had spent US$49 million on them. inewsource
  • Researchers USC and University of California, Irvine researchers: Dust events were linked to wheezing and to lower lung function in children near the Sea. USC News

California's Salton Sea Management Program (SSMP) is required by a 2017 State Water Board stipulated order to build 29,800 acres of habitat and dust-suppression projects by 31 December 2028. About US$588 million had been authorized by September 2023, including Proposition 1 (US$80.0 million) and Proposition 68 (US$185.0 million). The Legislative Analyst's Office found the program missed the annual targets in each of its first five years, with fewer than 2,500 of the 11,500 acres due by the end of 2023 completed.

11,500 required; fewer than 2,500 completedCumulative acres required by the State Water Board order by the end of 2023, compared with acres completed
California Legislative Analyst's Office, 26 February 2024. The LAO counted about 7,600 acres completed or under construction; other sources count completed and in-progress acres differently.

Status As of October 2026: the programme is under way with funding cited at about US$750 million; the LAO found in 2024 that the annual acreage targets had been missed for five years; completed acres after 2023 are not confirmed in the sources reviewed.

What?
A state programme to build 29,800 acres of habitat and dust-suppression projects on the exposed lakebed of the Salton Sea by the end of 2028, including the Species Conservation Habitat ponds at the south end. California Legislative Analyst's Office
Where?
The Salton Sea, Imperial and Riverside Counties, with the SCH project at the south end near the New River. California Natural Resources Agency, Salton Sea Management Program
When?
10-Year Plan 2017; stipulated order November 2017; targets from 2018 to 2028; SCH expansion groundbreaking 15 October 2024. California Legislative Analyst's Office
Who?
Gained
  • Communities and wildlife in project areas — CNRA reports dust suppression of 75 to 90 percent in project areas and more birds in areas previously exposed (agency statements) KESQ
Lost
Harmed
  • The Salton Sea and nearby residents — Exposed playa dust; 24% of 722 children surveyed had asthma; lower lung function linked to dust exposure USC News
Why?
The state accepted responsibility for the Sea's restoration under the QSA legislation; IID petitioned in 2014 over the pace of action and the Board's 2017 order set the acreage goals. California Legislative Analyst's Office
How?
The state builds ponds and wetlands, vegetation and surface-roughening projects on the lakebed using bond, General Fund, federal and local money. California Legislative Analyst's Office
6 of 6 questions (what, who, where, when, why, how) have an answer on record

What happened

The record, in order.

The state's response to the shrinking Salton Sea is organised under the Salton Sea Management Program, led by the California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) with the Department of Water Resources (DWR) and the Department of Fish and Wildlife. According to the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO), IID petitioned the State Water Resources Control Board in 2014 over the slow pace of state action; the state published a Phase 1: 10-Year Plan in 2017 and the Board approved a stipulated water rights order in November 2017 requiring the state to meet annual acreage goals, at least half of the acres to provide habitat benefits for fish and wildlife. The order requires a cumulative 29,800 acres by 31 December 2028 (500 acres in 2018, rising to 4,200 in 2028), an annual public meeting, and a "catch up" the following year if a goal is missed.

The LAO reported that about US$590 million had been authorized for the programme by 20 September 2023: Proposition 12 (2000) US$4.8 million, Proposition 50 (2002) US$32.9 million, Proposition 84 (2006) US$44.2 million, Proposition 1 (2014) US$80.0 million and Proposition 68 (2018) US$185.0 million (bonds, US$347 million in all, excluding debt service); the General Fund US$101.0 million; federal US$71.8 million including US$70.0 million from the Bureau of Reclamation for the Species Conservation Habitat (SCH) expansion; and US$68.5 million from the local Salton Sea Restoration Fund; US$2.1 million was unspent. A further US$175 million of federal money through 2026 depended on voluntary Colorado River reductions by IID and Coachella Valley Water District. The LAO added that nearly all authorized funds had been spent or committed and that no ongoing state funding was dedicated apart from anticipated lithium tax revenue. A CNRA official told the 2026 Salton Sea Summit that restoration funding is about US$750 million, "three-quarters of a billion dollars".

On acreage, the LAO's figure for the end of 2023 was about 7,600 acres completed or under construction and fewer than 2,500 completed, against 11,500 required; "acres actually completed or under construction" were 755 in 2020, 1,000 to 2,000 in 2021, 290 in 2022 and 5,400 in 2023. The Desert Sun reported in November 2023 that 368 acres were completed and 5,356 acres of interim dust control were under construction. The SCH project at the south end of the Sea, about 4,100 acres in the LAO's description, was nearing completion in early 2024; an expansion of 750 acres broke ground on 15 October 2024 (Bond Buyer). The programme's project fact sheet, last updated 29 January 2026, gave the SCH project a total area of approximately 10,000 acres, ponds with completed construction of 4,910 acres and ponds filled with a mix of Salton Sea and New River water of 2,010 acres. The programme dashboard (undated) listed 4,782 of 29,800 acres complete, 7,937 in construction, 5,551 in design and 11,530 in planning, with US$589 million in funds committed.

On results, CNRA's Joe Shea said in October 2026 that air quality monitoring shows dust suppression of 75 to 90 percent in project areas. The Pacific Institute (August 2025) wrote that preliminary estimates suggest 75% dust reduction in covered areas per inewsource, that state and local agencies had spent "tens of millions of dollars" on dust control, that the only multi-year estimates put lakebed emissions at "less than one percent of total dust emissions in the region", and that source suppression alone is not sufficient, feasible or cost-effective. Peer-reviewed studies in the region linked dust events to child respiratory outcomes (USC, Environmental Research, 2024; UC Irvine, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2025). The Pacific Institute page recorded the Sea's surface at -243.8 feet on 25 July 2026.

In February 2024 the LAO counted completed, in-progress and planned projects at about 15,700 acres, "only gets the state about halfway to the 2028 required target", and wrote that the state had not formally identified additional projects. CNRA Secretary Wade Crowfoot told the State Water Board in May 2023: "we continue to come from behind in terms of meeting our acreage targets". The LAO described the state's commitments as far exceeding a one-time US$60 million appropriation and suggested bonds, lithium tax revenues, the General Fund or special funds; at the October 2026 summit speakers noted that the seven Colorado River states have no agreement in place beyond 2028.

  1. 2003QSA executed; the state's 15-year mitigation period begins
  2. 2007Natural Resources Agency study recommends a US$9 billion preferred alternative, judged infeasible
  3. 2014IID petitions the State Water Board to require state management of the Sea
  4. 2017Phase 1: 10-Year Plan published; State Water Board stipulated order approved (November)
  5. 2020First projects; about 755 acres completed or under construction
  6. 2023End-2023 milestone of 11,500 cumulative acres; fewer than 2,500 completed (LAO); US$70 million federal funds received in December
  7. 2024750-acre expansion of the Species Conservation Habitat project breaks ground (15 October)
  8. 2026SCH fact sheet (29 January): 4,910 acres of ponds built, 2,010 filled; CNRA cites about US$750 million in funding (October)

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

“we continue to come from behind in terms of meeting our acreage targets”

Wade Crowfoot, California Natural Resources Secretary, to the State Water Board · May 2023 · Palm Springs Desert Sun

“They are way, way, way behind the milestones that the State Water Board memorialized”

“This moment is different. It's backed by real dollars, three-quarters of a billion dollars.”

Joe Shea, California Natural Resources Agency · October 2026 · KESQ

“we're actually suppressing dust at 75 to 90 percent in our project areas.”

Joe Shea, California Natural Resources Agency · October 2026 · KESQ

“Addressing the state's commitments at the Salton Sea will far exceed a one-time $60 million appropriation for projects.”

“It may be better use of state and local funds to protect people where they are exposed”

Michael Cohen, Pacific Institute · 16 August 2025 · inewsource

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Whether the programme is on schedule
Government and regulators
California Natural Resources Agency (Secretary, May 2023)

The state continues to come from behind in meeting its acreage targets.

Palm Springs Desert Sun
Government and regulators
California Natural Resources Agency (official, October 2026)

"We've shown just in the last couple of years that if you put real dollars in, you can get real projects out."

KESQ
Government and regulators
Legislative Analyst's Office

The programme missed required annual acreage targets in each of the first five years; completed and planned projects total about 15,700 acres, about halfway to the 2028 target.

California Legislative Analyst's Office
Researchers
Michael Cohen, Pacific Institute

The state is "way, way, way behind the milestones that the State Water Board memorialized".

Palm Springs Desert Sun
How much dust the projects suppress and whether suppression is the right response
Government and regulators
California Natural Resources Agency

Air quality monitoring shows dust suppression of 75 to 90 percent in project areas.

KESQ
Researchers
Pacific Institute (2025)

The only multi-year estimates put lakebed emissions at "less than one percent of total dust emissions in the region"; suppression at the source alone is not sufficient, politically feasible or cost-effective.

Pacific Institute
Press and investigations
inewsource, reporting the Pacific Institute study

Preliminary estimates suggest the state's dust suppression projects reduced dust by 75% in the areas covered; the state had spent US$49 million on them.

inewsource
Researchers
USC and University of California, Irvine researchers

Dust events were linked to wheezing and to lower lung function in children near the Sea.

USC News

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

  • The programme described as backed by about US$750 million, with dust suppression of 75 to 90 percent in project areas.
    Joe Shea, California Natural Resources Agency, as reported by KESQ · KESQ
  • The SCH expansion presented as supported by US$250 million in federal funding, with 750 acres added to 4,100 acres under construction.
    Officials at the 15 October 2024 groundbreaking, as reported by the Bond Buyer · The Bond Buyer

Recorded

In nature's name

What was promised in nature's name, the money that moved, and what was measured.

Promised

  • “This moment is different. It's backed by real dollars, three-quarters of a billion dollars.” — Joe Shea, California Natural Resources Agency (October 2026) KESQ
  • “we're actually suppressing dust at 75 to 90 percent in our project areas.” — Joe Shea, California Natural Resources Agency (October 2026) KESQ

Money moved in nature's name

WhatKindAmountPeriod
Total funding authorized for the Salton Sea Management Program (as of 20 September 2023; excludes bond debt service; US$2.1 million unspent)
State of California, federal government, local QSA agencies
California Legislative Analyst's Office
Budget$588m2000–2023
Proposition 1 (2014) bond funds (staffing, project design and SCH construction)
State of California
California Legislative Analyst's Office
Budget$80m2014
Proposition 68 (2018) bond funds (SCH construction, habitat and dust suppression projects, North Lake Demonstration Project and staffing)
State of California
California Legislative Analyst's Office
Budget$185m2018
Bond funds in total (Propositions 12, 50, 84, 1 and 68) (as stated by the LAO; excludes debt service)
State of California
California Legislative Analyst's Office
Budget$347m2000–2018
General Fund (SCH construction, vegetation enhancement, design and staffing)
State of California
California Legislative Analyst's Office
Budget$101mto 2023
Bureau of Reclamation funds for the SCH expansion (received December 2023; a further US$175 million through 2026 contingent on voluntary Colorado River reductions)
Bureau of Reclamation
California Legislative Analyst's Office
Paid out$70m2023
Salton Sea Restoration Fund (local QSA agencies) (total by 2047, about US$1.58 million a year)
IID, CVWD and SDCWA
California Legislative Analyst's Office
Pledged$69mto 2047
Governor's one-time proposal for six projects (proposal for 2024-25; part of a US$65.2 million General Fund request)
Governor of California (proposal)
California Legislative Analyst's Office
Budget$60m2024-25
Restoration funding as cited by a CNRA official ('about three-quarters of a billion dollars'; no breakdown given)
California Natural Resources Agency
KESQ
Budget$750m estimateto 2026
Spent on dust suppression projects (as reported by inewsource from the Pacific Institute report; the report itself says 'tens of millions of dollars')
State of California (as reported by inewsource)
inewsource
Spent$49mto 2025

Benefit to nature: what was measured

Measured below the promise

The 2017 order set a cumulative 29,800 acres by 2028 and 11,500 acres by the end of 2023. The Legislative Analyst's Office, an office of the Legislature, found fewer than 2,500 acres completed against 11,500 required and annual targets missed in each of the first five years. The dust-suppression percentages (75 to 90 percent) are CNRA's own figures; the Pacific Institute cites preliminary estimates of 75% and writes that lakebed emissions are less than one percent of regional dust. No independent measurement of habitat outcomes was found.

Cumulative acres required by end of 2023
11,500
Order, as reported by the LAO California Legislative Analyst's Office
Acres completed
fewer than 2,500
LAO, early 2024; about 7,600 completed or under construction California Legislative Analyst's Office
SCH ponds built / filled
4,910 / 2,010 acres
Dust suppression in project areas
75 to 90 percent (CNRA); 75% preliminary (Pacific Institute)
Agency figure; not an independent measurement KESQ

Operation Ongoing · Phase 1 runs to 31 December 2028; completed acres after 2023 are not confirmed in the sources reviewed. California Legislative Analyst's Office

Findings on record

  • Official audit California Legislative Analyst's Office (2024-02-26) · The 2024-25 Budget: Salton Sea Management Program: “Since the SWRCB stipulated order was issued in 2017, SSMP has missed required annual acreage targets in each of the first five years” California Legislative Analyst's Office
  • Own admission California Natural Resources Agency (Secretary Wade Crowfoot) (2023-05) · State Water Board workshop, May 2023, as reported by the Desert Sun: “we continue to come from behind in terms of meeting our acreage targets” Palm Springs Desert Sun

Who gained

Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

Reached nature or the ground

Not published
No figure published.

Gained elsewhere

Not totalled
Currency: USD · Window: 2000–2026. All figures cover the same period. * Estimate built from cited figures.

Responses on record

  • California Natural Resources Agency (May 2023; October 2026): Its Secretary said in May 2023 that the state continues to come from behind in meeting its acreage targets; its official said in October 2026 that the programme is backed by about US$750 million and suppresses dust at 75 to 90 percent in project areas. · KESQ
  • Imperial Irrigation District (2014): Petitioned the State Water Board in 2014 to require the state to implement a management plan, according to the LAO; no statement of its own on programme results is recorded in the sources reviewed. · California Legislative Analyst's Office
  • Bureau of Reclamation: No statement of its own on programme results is recorded in the sources reviewed.

In court and with insurers

Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

Lawsuits and rulings

  1. 2014–2017Settled
    State Water Board stipulated order revising the QSA water rights permit (Order WR 2017-0134)
    California State Water Resources Control Board · Administrative · Imperial Irrigation District (petitioner) → State of California

    IID petitioned the Board in 2014 to require the state to begin implementing a management plan. In November 2017 the Board approved a stipulated order requiring the state to meet annual acreage goals of the Phase 1: 10-Year Plan, at least half of the project acres to provide habitat benefits, an annual public meeting, and a catch-up if a goal is missed. The LAO found the goals missed in each of the first five years. California Legislative Analyst's Office

Insurers

No insurer decision on record.

What nature saw

Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

Cumulative acres required by end of 2023
11,500
State Water Board stipulated order, as reported by the LAO
Acres completed by early 2024
fewer than 2,500
LAO; about 7,600 completed or under construction
SCH ponds with completed construction
4,910 acres
SSMP fact sheet, 29 January 2026; 2,010 acres filled
Dust suppression in project areas
75 to 90 percent
CNRA official, October 2026; Pacific Institute cites preliminary estimates of 75%
Surface elevation
-243.8 feet, 25 July 2026
Pacific Institute page citing USGS gage

What we don't know

Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

Nature

  • Disputed How much dust the projects suppress and whether suppression is the right response

Figures

  • Self-reported only Dust reduction percent: KESQ, report published 15 October 2026. CNRA's own figure, in project areas

Accounts

  • Disputed Whether the programme is on schedule

Record

  • Not measured Not measured: the share of the programme's habitat and dust-suppression acres that has been independently measured for dust reduction. The 75 to 90 percent figure is CNRA's own; the 75% figure the Pacific Institute cites is described as preliminary.
  • None on record None on record: a funded plan beyond Phase 1. The LAO wrote that apart from anticipated lithium tax revenue no ongoing state funding is dedicated for SSMP projects or maintenance and operations.
  • Disputed Unclear: how many acres have been completed. The LAO reported fewer than 2,500 completed and about 7,600 completed or under construction (early 2024); the Desert Sun reported 368 completed and 5,356 interim acres under construction (November 2023); the programme dashboard (undated) lists 4,782 complete. The sources use different dates and definitions.
  • Unclear Unclear: the programme's total. The LAO gives US$588.2 million authorized (September 2023), the dashboard US$589 million committed (undated) and CNRA's Joe Shea about US$750 million (October 2026); the sources do not reconcile the figures.
  • Unclear Unclear: the 10-year target. The LAO and the order give 29,800 acres; the Desert Sun gives about 30,000.
  • None on record None on record: acres completed in 2024 and 2025 against the targets of 2,700 and 3,400 acres.

Did the harm stop?

The sources reviewed show the Sea's decline continuing: the LAO wrote that the Sea will continue to contract, and the Pacific Institute recorded -243.8 feet on 25 July 2026. The programme reports project areas where dust is suppressed, in its own figures.

Who paid?

California taxpayers through voter-approved bonds (US$347 million), the General Fund (US$101.0 million) and, per the LAO, the federal government (US$71.8 million) and the local QSA agencies through the Salton Sea Restoration Fund (US$68.5 million).

Sources

Voices on record: — Company or project✓ Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations✓ Communities and civil society✓ Researchers

Government and regulators

  1. The 2024-25 Budget: Salton Sea Management Program
    California Legislative Analyst's Office · 2024-02-26
  2. Species Conservation Habitat (SCH) project fact sheet
    California Natural Resources Agency, Salton Sea Management Program · 2026-01-29
  3. Salton Sea Management Program progress dashboard (undated)
    California Natural Resources Agency, Salton Sea Management Program ·
  4. 2025 Annual Report on the Salton Sea Management Program (library page)
    California Natural Resources Agency, via California Water Library · 2025-03-31

Communities and civil society

Connected cases

Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.

Science and environment

Wetland
Land that is saturated or covered with water for long periods, such as marshes, swamps and peat bogs.
Carbon credits and emissions trading · Biodiversity offset / offset credit · Protected area / relocation · Water use · United States · 1988–2026
US compensatory mitigation and conservation banking under the "no net loss" policy
Same type: Protected area / relocation, Water useSame countryHarm to nature disputed
Protected area / relocation · Water use · United States · 2000–2026
Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (Florida): cost estimates, spending and National Academies reviews
Same type: Protected area / relocation, Water useSame countryHarm to nature disputed
Protected area / relocation · Water use · Chemical pollution · United States · 2010–2026
Chesapeake Bay Program: the 2010 TMDL, the 2025 goals and results
Same type: Protected area / relocation, Water useSame countryHarm to nature disputed
Water use · Protected area / relocation · United States · 2023–2026
Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment v. Utah Department of Natural Resources: public-trust lawsuit over the Great Salt Lake
Same type: Water use, Protected area / relocationSame countryHarm to nature disputed
Agriculture, livestock and food · Water use · Chemical pollution · Protected area / relocation · Netherlands · 1990–2026
Dutch nitrogen crisis and farm buyouts
Same type: Water use, Protected area / relocationHarm to nature disputed
Protected area / relocation · Water use · Kenya · 2014–2024
Sengwer evictions from Embobut forest and the EU Water Towers programme (Kenya)
Same type: Protected area / relocation, Water useHarm to nature disputed