Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Mining · Pakistan · 2025

US EXIM Bank approves $1.25 billion for Reko Diq copper-gold project

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 3 none on record · 1 not measured See the gaps

The US Export-Import Bank approved $1.25 billion in financing for the Reko Diq copper-gold project in Balochistan, Pakistan. The sources reviewed do not set out the environmental or community effects of Reko Diq.

What?
The US Export-Import Bank approved $1.25 billion in financing for the Reko Diq copper-gold project. Profit (Pakistan Today)
Where?
Balochistan, Pakistan. Profit (Pakistan Today)
When?
Reported in December 2025. Profit (Pakistan Today)
Who?
Gained
Lost
None on record
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Export-credit financing from the US Export-Import Bank; shareholdings are Barrick 50% and Balochistan 25%. Profit (Pakistan Today)
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

Profit (Pakistan Today) reported that the US Export-Import Bank approved $1.25 billion in financing for the Reko Diq copper-gold project in Balochistan.

The same report said Barrick holds 50% of Reko Diq and Balochistan holds 25%.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • None on record The sources reviewed do not describe the environmental or community impacts of Reko Diq.
    • None on record The sources reviewed do not say whether the financing has been drawn down or what conditions apply.
    • None on record The sources reviewed do not explain the reasons for the approval.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Press and investigations

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.