Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Mining · Thailand · 2025

Myanmar Kachin heavy rare earth mining and Kok River arsenic

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured. Disputed
What the record lacks: 1 none on record · 2 insufficient · 1 not measured · 1 disputed See the gaps
Accounts of the harm differ
Where does the arsenic in the Kok and Mekong rivers come from?
  • Government and regulators Thailand's Pollution Control Department: Measured arsenic at 2.5 times the WHO limit at 4 of 5 sites; the source was identified as rare earth and gold mines in Shan State. Mongabay
  • International bodies Mekong River Commission: Assessment found serious arsenic contamination in the Mekong and Kok rivers due mainly to mining operations (as headlined by BHRRC). Business & Human Rights Resource Centre
  • Company or project Mine operators in Myanmar: No response is on record in the sources reviewed.

Thai and Mekong River Commission measurements in 2025 found arsenic at 2.5 times the World Health Organization limit at four of five sites on the Kok and Mekong rivers. Reports attributed it mainly to rare earth and gold mining in Myanmar's Shan State.

2.5 timesArsenic versus the WHO limit, Kok and Mekong rivers (4 of 5 sites)
Measurements by Thailand's Pollution Control Department and the Mekong River Commission, June-July 2025.

Status As of July 2025: measurements found arsenic at 2.5 times the WHO limit at four of five sites on the Kok and Mekong rivers.

What?
Arsenic at 2.5 times the WHO limit was measured at four of five sites on the Kok and Mekong rivers, linked to rare earth and gold mining in Shan State. Mongabay
Where?
Kok and Mekong rivers in Thailand; mines in Myanmar's Shan State. Mongabay
When?
Measurements reported June-July 2025. Mongabay
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
None on record
Harmed
  • Farmers in Thailand — Arsenic risk to rice irrigated with Kok River water.
Why?
The sources reviewed do not state the mine operators' reasons or the commercial context of the mining.
How?
Arsenic from mines in Shan State reached the Kok and Mekong rivers across the border. Business & Human Rights Resource Centre
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

In June and July 2025, Thailand's Pollution Control Department and the Mekong River Commission measured arsenic in the Kok and Mekong rivers. At four of five sites the level was 2.5 times the World Health Organization limit. The reports linked the contamination to rare earth and gold mines in Myanmar's Shan State.

Mongabay reported that rare earth mining in Myanmar was blamed for toxic river spillover into Thailand. The Business and Human Rights Resource Centre headlined the Mekong River Commission's assessment as showing serious arsenic contamination in the Mekong and Kok rivers due mainly to mining operations.

Arsenic risk to rice irrigated with Kok River water in Thailand was also noted.

  1. 2024Global Witness publishes an investigation into heavy rare earth mining in Myanmar (claims unverified, see unknown)
  2. 2025Thai and Mekong River Commission measurements find arsenic at 2.5 times the WHO limit at four of five sites on the Kok and Mekong

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Where does the arsenic in the Kok and Mekong rivers come from?
Government and regulators
Thailand's Pollution Control Department

Measured arsenic at 2.5 times the WHO limit at 4 of 5 sites; the source was identified as rare earth and gold mines in Shan State.

Mongabay
International bodies
Mekong River Commission

Assessment found serious arsenic contamination in the Mekong and Kok rivers due mainly to mining operations (as headlined by BHRRC).

Business & Human Rights Resource Centre
Company or project
Mine operators in Myanmar

No response is on record in the sources reviewed.

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

    Recorded

    • Thailand's Pollution Control Department and the Mekong River Commission measured arsenic at 2.5 times the WHO limit at 4 of 5 sites on the Kok and Mekong rivers; the source was identified as rare earth and gold mines in Shan State.
    • The Mekong River Commission's assessment found the contamination due mainly to mining operations (as headlined by the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre).

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What nature saw

    Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

    Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

    Arsenic versus WHO limit
    2.5 times
    4 of 5 sites, Kok and Mekong rivers, 2025
    Reported source
    Mining in Shan State
    Rare earth and gold mines in Myanmar
    Independent ecological evaluation
    None found
    The sources reviewed give no assessment of fish or ecosystem effects

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: No independent ecological evaluation is on record.
    • Disputed Where does the arsenic in the Kok and Mekong rivers come from?

    Accounts

    • None on record Mine operators in Myanmar: No response is on record in the sources reviewed.

    Record

    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: Global Witness (May 2024) reported that Myanmar had become the largest source of heavy rare earths for China, that China's imports from Myanmar rose from 19,500 tonnes in 2021 to 41,700 tonnes in 2023, more than twice its domestic production, and that about 300 sites in Kachin held more than 2,700 leach ponds in 2022.
    • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: that armed groups controlled mines in Kachin.

    Did the harm stop?

    The sources reviewed do not record any end to the arsenic contamination.

    Who paid?

    The sources reviewed record the contamination reaching rivers in Thailand, a country with no commercial link to the mines.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations✓ Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.