Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Pipeline · United States · 2013–2024

Consultant ERM wrote the Keystone XL environmental impact statement

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 1 none on record · 2 insufficient · 1 not measured · 1 disputed See the gaps

ERM, a consulting firm, wrote the environmental impact statement for the Keystone XL pipeline for the US State Department. It was alleged that ERM did not disclose earlier work for TransCanada, and the sources reviewed do not establish that the conflict changed the review’s findings.

What?
ERM, a consulting firm, wrote the environmental impact statement for the Keystone XL pipeline.
Where?
United States and Canada (pipeline route)
When?
Review prepared around 2013–2014; Alberta loss reported 2021; tribunal decision July 2024 Hydrocarbon Processing
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
  • Alberta taxpayers — Bore the loss on Keystone XL, about C$1.3 billion Global News
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
A consultant prepared the review for the US State Department; the sources reviewed do not describe how the consultant was selected
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

ERM wrote the environmental impact statement for the pipeline for the US State Department (no source link in the sources reviewed).

Alberta’s loss on Keystone XL, about C$1.3 billion, fell on taxpayers, Global News reported in June 2021.

In July 2024 a tribunal rejected, for lack of jurisdiction, TC Energy’s claim for more than $15 billion over Keystone XL, Hydrocarbon Processing reported.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • Disputed Reported but not verified: ERM was alleged not to have disclosed prior TransCanada work and American Petroleum Institute membership on a conflict-of-interest form.
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: a State Department inspector general (reported by Grist in 2014) found the rules were “largely” followed but criticised weak documentation.
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: KKR owns ERM.
    • None on record The sources reviewed do not say whether ERM’s role changed the environmental findings of the statement.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Press and investigations

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.