Great Salt Lake, Utah: record-low level on 7 November 2022 and the attribution of the decline
- Researchers Wurtsbaugh et al. (2017): Water consumption is responsible for a lowering of approximately 3.4 m (11 feet) and a 48% reduction in volume; consumptive use accounts for the long-term drop since 1847. Nature Geoscience
- Researchers Great Salt Lake Strike Team (2023): Natural and human consumptive use explain 67-73% of the record-low elevation; natural variability 15-23%; climate warming 8-11%. Great Salt Lake Strike Team (Utah State University, University of Utah, Utah Departments of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Food, and Environmental Quality); hosted by the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute
- Government and regulators US Geological Survey (1984): The lake would have been about 5 feet higher in 1983 without consumptive use since 1847. US Geological Survey
- Government and regulators Utah Division of Wildlife Resources: The lake is estimated to be 11 feet lower due to human diversions. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
- Courts Third District Court (27 March 2025): Recorded the plaintiffs' allegation that upstream diversions are 'by far the most significant cause' of the decline; the court was not ruling on causation at the motion-to-dismiss stage. Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, Utah (copy hosted by Earthjustice)
- Government and regulators US Geological Survey: Approximately 2,300 square miles in 1986; less than 1,000 square miles in 2022. US Geological Survey, Utah Water Science Center
- Government and regulators State of Utah, Great Salt Lake site: About 3,300 square miles at the 1986 record high; roughly 800 square miles at the November 2022 low. State of Utah (greatsaltlake.utah.gov)
- Communities and civil society Plaintiffs' complaint (2023): The lake had lost approximately 73 percent of its water and 60 percent of its surface area as of fall 2022, compared with a 1850-2016 baseline (an allegation). Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, Utah (plaintiffs' pleading)
- Researchers Wurtsbaugh et al. (2017): Lake water extraction for salt-pond mineral production is 13% of total consumptive use. Nature Geoscience
- Press and investigations Salt Lake Tribune (2024): Mineral companies like Compass deplete about 7% of the lake's water. Salt Lake Tribune
The southern arm of the Great Salt Lake reached a record low of 4,188.5 feet on 7 November 2022, according to the US Geological Survey. A peer-reviewed study attributes about 11 feet of the long-term fall to consumptive water use, mainly irrigated agriculture; a state-agency and university Strike Team attributes 67-73% of the 2022 low to natural and human consumptive use combined.
USGS Utah Water Science Center, feet above NGVD 1929. The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources page showed 4,189.8 feet at Saltair Boat Harbor on 26 October 2026.
Status As of 26 October 2026: the lake stood at 4,189.8 feet at Saltair Boat Harbor, above the 4,188.5-foot record of 7 November 2022; the cause of the long-term fall is attributed to human consumptive use by Wurtsbaugh et al. and, in combination with natural factors, by the Strike Team.
- Irrigated agriculture in the basin — 63% of consumptive use in the Wurtsbaugh et al. estimate; alfalfa accounts for about 56 percent of depletions and 0.07 percent of Utah's GDP (2025 study as reported by the New York Review of Books) Nature Geoscience
- Mineral producers on the lake — Lake water extraction for salt-pond mineral production is 13% of consumptive use (Wurtsbaugh et al.) Nature Geoscience
- Cities and industry — Municipal and industrial uses are 11% of consumptive use (Wurtsbaugh et al.) Nature Geoscience
- Boat harbours and mineral companies — Wurtsbaugh et al. write that boat harbours are inaccessible and mineral companies have difficulty accessing brines Nature Geoscience
- The lake and its ecosystem — Area shrunk about 50% and volume reduced 48% (Wurtsbaugh et al.); over 75% of the lakebeds of Bear River Bay and Farmington Bay exposed in 2016 Nature Geoscience
What happened
The US Geological Survey (USGS) states that on 7 November 2022 the southern arm of the Great Salt Lake had receded to a record low water surface elevation of 4,188.5 feet above NGVD 1929, "after years of much lower-than-average precipitation". USGS gives the lake's area as approximately 2,300 square miles in 1986, when the lake was at a record high, and "less than 1,000 square miles" in 2022. The State of Utah's Great Salt Lake site gives the 1986 record high as 4,211.65 feet with a surface of about 3,300 square miles, and says the lake covered roughly 800 square miles at the November 2022 low. The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (DWR) page states that between 1875 and the lowest level it lists (4,191.35 feet) the lake dropped about 8.5 feet from a historic high of 4,211.6 feet, which "resulted in a loss of about 44% of the lake's surface area"; that page does not mention the 2022 record.
The lake has since stood above that record. A Salt Lake Tribune article of 7 January 2026 put the southern end at 4,191.6 feet, with the north arm about half a foot lower, about 800 square miles of lakebed exposed and salinity at around 12%, against about 16% at the January 2022 elevation (4,190.4 feet), according to Bonnie Baxter of Westminster University. KUER reported the lake at about 4,190 feet in early August 2026, about eight feet below the minimum target range in the 2024 strategic plan. DWR's page showed 4,189.8 feet at Saltair Boat Harbor on 26 October 2026.
Wurtsbaugh and seven co-authors (Nature Geoscience, 23 October 2017) report that "there has been no significant long-term change in precipitation or streamflow from mountain tributaries" since 1847, while "water development and river diversions since 1847 have produced a persistent reduction of flow into the lake, approaching 40% in recent years", and that lake area has shrunk about 50%. Their water-balance model, run without consumptive uses, gives a flat long-term trend at a natural mean elevation of 1,282 m (4,206 feet). The text states that water consumption is responsible for an observed lowering of approximately 3.4 m (11 feet) and a reduction in lake volume of 48%; the caption of their Figure 3 gives 3.6 m. The paper also records the lake's lowest level at that time in November 2016 and says climate change "does indeed represent a pervasive long-term problem" for saline lakes.
Other bodies give other attributions. The Great Salt Lake Strike Team (Utah State University, the University of Utah and the Utah Departments of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Food, and Environmental Quality) wrote on 8 February 2023 that "Human and natural consumptive water use explain over two-thirds of low lake levels", estimating the contribution to the current record-low elevation at 67-73% for natural and human consumptive use, 15-23% for natural variability and 8-11% for direct evaporation from climate warming. USGS Circular 913 (1984) states that the lake "would have been about 5 feet higher in 1983 had there been no consumptive use of water owing to man's activities in the lake basin since 1847". The DWR page states: "In fact, it is estimated that the lake is 11 feet lower due to human diversions." In the lawsuit filed in 2023 the plaintiffs allege that upstream diversions are "by far the most significant cause" of the decline; the court's ruling of 27 March 2025 recorded the allegation and did not decide causation.
On who used the water, Wurtsbaugh et al. cite state evaluations of total consumptive use of approximately 1.8 billion m3, composed of agriculture (63%), lake water extraction for salt-pond mineral production (13%), municipal and industrial uses (11%), evapotranspiration from constructed wetlands (10%) and reservoir evaporation (3%). The New York Review of Books, citing a 2025 study, reported that alfalfa in the basin accounts for about 56 percent of water depletions but only 0.07 percent of Utah's GDP. The Salt Lake Tribune reported in September 2024 that mineral companies "deplete about 7% of its water"; the two shares have different bases and the sources do not reconcile them. The State of Utah says the lake contributes more than $2 billion to the state's economy annually; Wurtsbaugh et al. cite a 2012 estimate of US$1.32 billion per year from mineral extraction, brine shrimp cyst production and recreation.
- 1847Start of the period over which Wurtsbaugh et al. measure water development and river diversions
- 1963October: lowest level recorded until then (1,277.6 m as cited by Wurtsbaugh et al.)
- 1978USGS Open-File Report 78-912 states the lake would have been about 5 feet higher in 1978 than in 1947 without human consumptive use
- 1984USGS Circular 913 states the lake would have been about 5 feet higher in 1983 without consumptive use
- 1986Record high of 4,211.65 feet (State of Utah); USGS gives an area of approximately 2,300 square miles
- 2016November: lowest level in recorded history at that time, by the average of the two main bays (Wurtsbaugh et al.)
- 2017Wurtsbaugh et al. publish the water-balance study in Nature Geoscience (23 October)
- 2022January: 4,190.4 feet; 7 November: record low of 4,188.5 feet (USGS)
- 2023Strike Team policy assessment attributes 67-73% of the record-low elevation to natural and human consumptive use (8 February); public-trust lawsuit filed in September
- 2025Court rules on motions to dismiss in the public-trust lawsuit (27 March)
- 202626 October: 4,189.8 feet at Saltair Boat Harbor (DWR)
What was said
“On November 7, 2022, the southern arm of the lake had receded to a record low water surface elevation of 4,188.5 feet”
“Water consumption is responsible for an observed lake lowering of approximately 3.4 m (11 feet), representing a reduction in lake volume of 48%.”
“Human and natural consumptive water use explain over two-thirds of low lake levels.”
“In fact, it is estimated that the lake is 11 feet lower due to human diversions.”
“would have been about 5 feet higher in 1983 had there been no consumptive use of water owing to man's activities in the lake basin since 1847”
“just how close we are to breaking the historic low”
Where accounts differ
Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.
Water consumption is responsible for a lowering of approximately 3.4 m (11 feet) and a 48% reduction in volume; consumptive use accounts for the long-term drop since 1847.
Nature GeoscienceNatural and human consumptive use explain 67-73% of the record-low elevation; natural variability 15-23%; climate warming 8-11%.
Great Salt Lake Strike Team (Utah State University, University of Utah, Utah Departments of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Food, and Environmental Quality); hosted by the Kem C. Gardner Policy InstituteThe lake would have been about 5 feet higher in 1983 without consumptive use since 1847.
US Geological SurveyThe lake is estimated to be 11 feet lower due to human diversions.
Utah Division of Wildlife ResourcesRecorded the plaintiffs' allegation that upstream diversions are 'by far the most significant cause' of the decline; the court was not ruling on causation at the motion-to-dismiss stage.
Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, Utah (copy hosted by Earthjustice)Approximately 2,300 square miles in 1986; less than 1,000 square miles in 2022.
US Geological Survey, Utah Water Science CenterAbout 3,300 square miles at the 1986 record high; roughly 800 square miles at the November 2022 low.
State of Utah (greatsaltlake.utah.gov)The lake had lost approximately 73 percent of its water and 60 percent of its surface area as of fall 2022, compared with a 1850-2016 baseline (an allegation).
Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, Utah (plaintiffs' pleading)Lake water extraction for salt-pond mineral production is 13% of total consumptive use.
Nature GeoscienceMineral companies like Compass deplete about 7% of the lake's water.
Salt Lake TribuneHow it looked
Shown
- Natural variability and climate change described as the reason for the lake's fall, before water-budget analyses were done; Wurtsbaugh et al. write that managers of Great Salt Lake and Oregon's Lake Abert "previously blamed declining lake levels only on natural precipitation cycles, without a direct analysis of the cause".Wurtsbaugh et al. (describing managers' earlier statements) · Nature Geoscience
Recorded
- USGS records a daily-average southern-arm elevation of 4,188.5 feet on 7 November 2022; its page gives no gauge for the record.
- The lake area is given as less than 1,000 square miles in 2022 by USGS and as roughly 800 square miles by the State of Utah's Great Salt Lake site.
- Wurtsbaugh et al. find consumptive use of about 1.8 billion m3, of which agriculture 63% and lake water extraction for salt-pond mineral production 13%.
- The Strike Team attributes 67-73% of the current record-low elevation to natural and human consumptive use, 15-23% to natural variability and 8-11% to climate warming.
- KUER reported the lake at about 4,190 feet in early August 2026, about eight feet below the minimum target range in the 2024 strategic plan.
Who gained
Reached nature or the ground
Gained elsewhere
Responses on record
- utah-dnr (6 September 2023): In 2023 the department's executive director said "There has been unprecedented interest, investment and action to preserve and protect the Great Salt Lake in recent years." The Governor's Office declined to comment on the lawsuit. · KSL.com
In court and with insurers
Lawsuits and rulings
Insurers
What nature saw
Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.
What we don't know
Nature
- Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.
- Disputed How much of the lake's fall is due to human water use
- Disputed Surface area of the lake at the 1986 high and at the 2022 low
- Disputed Share of the lake's depletion due to mineral extraction
Record
- Disputed Disputed: how much of the fall is due to human use. The sources give about 11 feet (Wurtsbaugh et al.; the DWR page), about 5 feet in 1983 (USGS Circular 913), and 67-73% of the 2022 low for natural and human consumptive use combined (Strike Team). They use different periods and bases.
- Disputed Disputed: the area of the lake at the 1986 high (approximately 2,300 square miles per USGS; about 3,300 per the State of Utah and DWR) and at the 2022 low (less than 1,000 per USGS; roughly 800 per the State of Utah).
- Unclear Unclear: the 3.4 m (11 feet) in the text of Wurtsbaugh et al. against 3.6 m in their Figure 3 caption.
- Disputed Unclear: mineral extraction's share of the lake's depletion: 13% of consumptive use (Wurtsbaugh et al.) and about 7% of the lake's water (Salt Lake Tribune, 2024) are given on different bases.
- None on record None on record in the sources reviewed: a current USGS statement of how much lower the lake is because of consumptive use; the only USGS statements found are from 1978 and 1984.
- None on record None on record in the sources reviewed: a date and gauge for the USGS record on its Utah Water Science Center page.
Did the harm stop?
The sources reviewed do not report that the decline has stopped: DWR's page showed 4,189.8 feet on 26 October 2026, and the Strike Team wrote in 2025 that the lake "remains well below the healthy range".
Who paid?
No source states a cost of the decline to a named payer. The State of Utah says the lake contributes more than $2 billion to the economy annually; the plaintiffs in the 2023 lawsuit allege industries depending on the lake contribute billions of dollars a year.
Sources
Government and regulators
- Half-meter topobathymetric elevation model and elevation-area-volume tables for Great Salt Lake, Utah, 2002-2016US Geological Survey, Utah Water Science Center ·
- Great Salt LakeState of Utah (greatsaltlake.utah.gov) ·
- Great Salt Lake water levelsUtah Division of Wildlife Resources · 2026-10-26
- Water-level and water-quality changes in Great Salt Lake, Utah, 1847-1983 (USGS Circular 913, Ted Arnow)US Geological Survey · 1984
- Water budget and water-surface fluctuations, Great Salt Lake, Utah (USGS Open-File Report 78-912, Ted Arnow)US Geological Survey · 1978
- Great Salt Lake Strike Team: Policy Assessment Executive Summary (version 2.0)Great Salt Lake Strike Team (Utah State University, University of Utah, Utah Departments of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Food, and Environmental Quality); hosted by the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute · 2023-02-08
Courts
- Ruling and Order re: Motions to Dismiss, Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment et al. v. Utah Department of Natural Resources et al., Case No. 230906637, Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County (Judge Laura S. Scott)Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, Utah (copy hosted by Earthjustice) · 2025-03-27
- Complaint, Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment et al. v. Utah Department of Natural Resources et al., Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County (copy hosted by Earthjustice)Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, Utah (plaintiffs' pleading) · 2023-09
Press and investigations
- The Great Salt Lake begins the new year teetering near record lows (Leia Larsen, Salt Lake Tribune)Utah Public Radio (Salt Lake Tribune) · 2026-01-07
- Putting the Lake to Work (Great Salt Lake)New York Review of Books · 2026-06-14
- Compass Minerals agreement with Utah on Great Salt Lake water, severance tax and leased landSalt Lake Tribune · 2024-09-04
Connected cases
- Dust and arsenic from the exposed Great Salt Lake lakebed: studies by USGS, the University of Utah and Utah State University United States · 2018–2026 Related matter
- US Geological Survey (Public authority) — here: Measures lake elevation and states the 7 November 2022 record low; published the 1978 and 1984 water-budget reports; there: Authored the 2022 and 2025 GeoHealth dust studies
- Utah State University (Research institution) — here: Home institution of lead author Wurtsbaugh and of Strike Team members; there: Blakowski and Brahney study of dust in vegetables
- Utah's spending in the Great Salt Lake's name since 2022: water trust, appropriations, leases and donated water rights United States · 2022–2026 Related matter
- Great Salt Lake Strike Team (Research institution) — here: Estimated the shares of the record-low elevation due to consumptive use, variability and warming; there: University and state-agency team that reports annually on progress
- Utah Department of Natural Resources (Public authority) — here: State department that manages the lake's sovereign lands through its divisions; there: State department whose executive director commented on the state's investment in the lake
- Brine shrimp cyst harvest on the Great Salt Lake: state-stated industry value, permits and the 2026 royalty United States · 2026
- Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (Public authority) — here: Publishes lake levels and areas and the estimate that the lake is 11 feet lower due to human diversions; there: Regulates the cyst harvest and publishes harvest totals and the industry value
- Gulf of Mexico dead zone (Mississippi nutrient runoff) United States · 1985–2026
- US Geological Survey (Public authority) — here: Measures lake elevation and states the 7 November 2022 record low; published the 1978 and 1984 water-budget reports; there: SPARROW nutrient-source modelling
- Mineral extraction on the Great Salt Lake: royalties, severance tax, the 2024 audit and Compass Minerals' voluntary agreement United States · 1960–2026
- Great Salt Lake Strike Team (Research institution) — here: Estimated the shares of the record-low elevation due to consumptive use, variability and warming; there: Reported the Compass and Morton Salt commitments
- Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment v. Utah Department of Natural Resources: public-trust lawsuit over the Great Salt Lake United States · 2023–2026
- Utah Department of Natural Resources (Public authority) — here: State department that manages the lake's sovereign lands through its divisions; there: Defendant