Chlorothalonil metabolites in Swiss groundwater
- The fungicide has been banned since 2020. Its breakdown products are very persistent, and they will affect me for many years. BAFU (Switzerland)
Breakdown products of the fungicide chlorothalonil, used in Switzerland since the 1970s, were found in groundwater in a 2017 pilot study. The substance has been banned since 2020.
BAFU. Chlorothalonil was used from the 1970s and banned in 2020; more than a quarter of monitoring points nationwide are affected.
Status As of October 2026: groundwater contamination by chlorothalonil metabolites continues; the court record on Syngenta's challenge is reported only in secondary summaries.
- Swiss groundwater (Swiss Plateau) — R471811 above 0.1 µg/L at more than half of monitoring points; metabolites very persistent BAFU (Switzerland)
What happened
Chlorothalonil is a fungicide that has been used in Switzerland since the 1970s. Its metabolites, including one called R471811, were found in groundwater in a pilot study in 2017, according to BAFU, the Swiss environment office.
BAFU reported that more than a quarter of monitoring points nationwide are affected. On the Swiss Plateau, R471811 exceeds 0.1 µg/L at more than 50% of monitoring points. The substance has been banned since 2020. BAFU described the metabolites as very persistent and expected them to affect groundwater for many years.
Syngenta is reported to have challenged the revocation of the approval in court. The account of that case comes only and is recorded under unverified items.
- 1970Use of chlorothalonil in Switzerland begins (1970s)
- 2017Metabolites found in groundwater in a pilot study
- 2020Chlorothalonil banned
How it looked
Shown
Recorded
- Chlorothalonil metabolites found in groundwater in a 2017 pilot study
- More than a quarter of monitoring points nationwide are affected
- On the Swiss Plateau, R471811 exceeds 0.1 µg/L at more than 50% of monitoring points
- Substance banned since 2020; metabolites very persistent and expected to affect groundwater for many years
In court and with insurers
Lawsuits and rulings
Insurers
What nature saw
Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.
What we don't know
Record
- Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: secondary reports say Syngenta's court challenge to the revocation of the approval was dismissed, but that an interim decision in 2020 temporarily removed the words “probably carcinogenic” from the state website. The court files could not be checked.
- Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: that the ban was upheld in court, on a basis that was only partly read. The final ruling on the scientific basis was not checked.
- Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: a French study screening 157 transformation products reportedly measured R471811 in more than half of raw and drinking water samples.
Did the harm stop?
The fungicide has been banned since 2020, but BAFU describes its metabolites as very persistent and expected to affect groundwater for many years.
Who paid?
Not established in the record.
Sources
Government and regulators
- Chlorothalonil in groundwaterBAFU (Switzerland) ·
Connected cases
- 62% of UK paraquat exports since 2015 went to poorer countries, analysis finds United Kingdom · 2015–2024
- Syngenta (Company) — here: Reported challenger of the revocation of approval (unverified); there: Paraquat producer named in the 2023 UK export figures
- EU banned-pesticide exports European Union · 2018–2026
- Syngenta (Company) — here: Reported challenger of the revocation of approval (unverified); there: Exporter; reported to have moved some operations to Germany after the French ban
- EU bans three neonicotinoid pesticides outdoors in 2018; Turkey follows in part European Union · 2018
- Syngenta (Company) — here: Reported challenger of the revocation of approval (unverified); there: neonicotinoid manufacturer; pollinator programme; court challenge
- Nonylphenol ethoxylates: Swiss ban and EU restriction Switzerland · 1984–2014
- BAFU (Public authority) — here: Swiss environment office reporting the monitoring results; there: Swiss Federal Office for the Environment; source for the Swiss record
- Paraquat bans, UK production for export and Chinese exports United Kingdom · 1989–2026
- Syngenta (Company) — here: Reported challenger of the revocation of approval (unverified); there: Producer; made paraquat for export in the UK
- Paraquat litigation (Syngenta/Chevron) and the Paraquat Papers United States · 1958–2026
- Syngenta (Company) — here: Reported challenger of the revocation of approval (unverified); there: Paraquat maker (successor to ICI's agricultural arm); settlement defendant
- Syngenta paid $105m to settle atrazine water-treatment claims United States · 2000–2012
- Syngenta (Company) — here: Reported challenger of the revocation of approval (unverified); there: settling defendant; company behind internal communications
- Syngenta settles thousands of paraquat lawsuits and keeps selling diquat Global · 1976–2026
- Syngenta (Company) — here: Reported challenger of the revocation of approval (unverified); there: Producer of paraquat and diquat; settled the lawsuits
- US Supreme Court blocks state cancer-warning suits against pesticide makers United States · 2026
- Syngenta (Company) — here: Reported challenger of the revocation of approval (unverified); there: Paraquat producer; announced Gramoxone phase-out