Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Protected area / relocation · British Indian Ocean Territory · 2009–2015

Arbitration tribunal finds UK breached UN sea law over Chagos reserve

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 5 none on record · 1 not measured See the gaps

A 2015 arbitration tribunal found a breach of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea in the dispute over the Chagos marine protected area, which a US cable called the most effective way to block former residents' return. The sources reviewed do not describe the reserve's effect on marine life.

What?
A marine protected area was set up around the Chagos Archipelago, and in 2015 an arbitration tribunal found a breach of UN sea law. JHA
Where?
Chagos Archipelago, Indian Ocean
When?
Evidence covers 2009 to 2015; the tribunal ruled in March 2015. JHA
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
  • Former residents of the Chagos Archipelago — return blocked, according to the cable
Harmed
None on record
Why?
According to a US diplomatic cable, to prevent former residents from returning.
How?
A marine protected area set up around the archipelago.
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

A Permanent Court of Arbitration tribunal found in March 2015 that the UK had breached the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, in a case brought by Mauritius.

A US diplomatic cable published by WikiLeaks described the reserve as the most effective way to prevent former residents from returning.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    1. 2015-03Claimant won
      Chagos Marine Protected Area arbitration: Mauritius v United Kingdom
      Permanent Court of Arbitration · International court · Mauritius → United Kingdom

      The tribunal found that the UK had breached the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, according to the sources reviewed. JHA

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • None on record The sources reviewed do not describe the reserve's effect on marine life or fishing.
    • None on record The cost and funding of the reserve are not stated in the sources reviewed.
    • None on record The UK government's own account of the reserve is not in the sources reviewed.
    • None on record The official description of the reserve as a major step for ocean protection has no named source.
    • None on record The sources reviewed do not describe how residents were removed, beyond the cable's reference to blocking their return.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: ✓ Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts— Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.

    Law and courts

    Arbitration
    A private dispute process in which an appointed arbitrator, instead of a court, decides the case.