Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Mining · United States · 2023–2026

US Congress lifts 2023 mining ban on Minnesota's Boundary Waters

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 2 none on record · 1 not measured See the gaps

The 2023 mining ban protecting Minnesota's Boundary Waters was removed in 2026 through a Congressional Review Act resolution. At stake: protection of the area from mining pollution.

What?
The 2023 mining ban on Boundary Waters was removed through a Congressional Review Act resolution, Earthjustice reported. Earthjustice
Where?
Minnesota, USA Earthjustice
When?
2023 ban; removed in 2026 Earthjustice
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
  • Boundary Waters area — Loses protection from mining pollution, per Earthjustice Earthjustice
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
A Congressional Review Act resolution that removed the 2023 mining ban. Earthjustice
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

The 2023 mining ban protecting Minnesota's Boundary Waters was removed in 2026 through a Congressional Review Act resolution, Earthjustice reported.

Earthjustice reported that the US Senate voted to strip the area's protection from mining pollution.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • None on record Not stated in the sources reviewed: the vote counts, the signing date, or which mining companies or projects may now proceed.
    • None on record Not stated in the sources reviewed: the acreage covered by the 2023 ban.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts— Press and investigations✓ Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.