Cases / Carbon credits · Australia · 2022–2024
Australian government rejects claim that natural regeneration credits are worthless
Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.
Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
- The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
Australia's natural regeneration (HIR) carbon credits were reported to have limited impact, and the government rejected a claim that the credits are worthless. At stake: whether the credits pay for forest regrowth that would not otherwise have happened.
What?
The Australian government rejected a claim that 25 million ACCU credits are worthless, as reported by QCI. QCI
Where?
Australia QCI
When?
Period 2022 to 2024.
Who?
Gained
None on recordLost
None on recordHarmed
None on recordWhy?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Carbon offsets based on natural regeneration (HIR). QCI
5 of 6 questions answered from the record · open: who
What happened
The record, in order.
QCI reported that the Australian government rejected a claim that 25 million ACCU credits are worthless.
QCI's summary describes HIR offsets as having limited impact.
In court and with insurers
Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.
Lawsuits and rulings
No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.
Insurers
No insurer decision on record.
What we don't know
Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.
Nature
- Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.
Record
- Insufficient Reported but not verified: vegetation change in 182 projects matched neighbouring areas (Macintosh et al., Communications Earth & Environment; not checked).
- Insufficient Reported but not verified: about 90% of offset demand was not met, per a NSW Audit Office review as reported by RenewEconomy.
- None on record Not stated in the sources reviewed: who bought, sold or profited from the credits, or the date of the audit.
Did the harm stop?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Who paid?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Sources
Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers
Press and investigations
Connected cases
Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.
- Australia rejects Central Queensland coal mine near Great Barrier Reef Australia · 2023
- Australian government (Government) — here: rejected the claim about the credits; there: Environment minister who refused approval
- Australian government rejects claim that 25 million carbon credits are worthless Australia · 2024
- Australian government (Government) — here: rejected the claim about the credits; there: Rejected the claim that 25 million ACCU credits were worthless
- Australian government water purchase from Eastern Australia Agriculture (Cayman-linked firm) Australia · 2017–2020
- Australian government (Government) — here: rejected the claim about the credits; there: Buyer of the licences
- Murray-Darling irrigation efficiency subsidies, Australia, 2008 to 2018 Australia · 2008–2018
- Australian government (Government) — here: rejected the claim about the credits; there: Ordered a probe into water buybacks