Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Data centre · Spain · 2022–2026

Amazon's water-positive pledge and a leaked 2022 memo

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured. Disputed
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 3 none on record · 1 insufficient · 1 not measured · 1 disputed See the gaps
Accounts of the harm differ
Is there enough water in Aragón for the planned AWS data centres?
  • Company or project Amazon Web Services: Asked to raise the water permits of three data centres by 48% per facility, from 36.4 to 53.9 million litres a year. Ecoticias
  • Communities and civil society Campaign "No es sequía, es saqueo": Campaigned against data centres in Aragón under the name "It is not drought, it is plunder"; the campaign put data centres at 51.6% of the region's energy plan and AWS investment at 15.7 million euros per job. elDiario.es
  • Government and regulators President of the Ebro basin authority: Said water for the Zaragoza campus was not guaranteed all year; the campus was given a cap of 204,697 m³ a year. Merca2

Amazon Web Services has pledged to be water positive by 2030. A leaked 2022 internal memo, reported in October 2025, discussed whether to leave the water used in generating electricity out of the pledge.

HalfShare of the memo's $109 million offset programme that, per the memo, would have been spent anyway
As reported by SourceMaterial from the leaked 2022 memo; the memo's own dollar figure was $109 million.

Status As of October 2026: no court case or regulatory finding is reported; the Zaragoza campus has a water cap and a non-binding Cuarte vote went against a further AWS project.

What?
A leaked 2022 AWS memo, reported in October 2025, discussed leaving the water used in electricity generation out of the "water positive by 2030" pledge, and local water disputes over AWS data centres in Aragón. SourceMaterial
Where?
Global pledge; local disputes in Aragón (Spain), with offsets in the Maipo basin (Chile) and a related facility in Querétaro (Mexico).
When?
Memo written in 2022; reported 25 October 2025; Aragón events March 2025 to October 2026. SourceMaterial
Who?
Gained
  • Amazon Web Services — According to the memo, a narrower pledge scope avoided doubling the campaign's size and budget. SourceMaterial
Lost
None on record
Harmed
None on record
Why?
The memo said that adding electricity-related water would double the campaign's size and budget. SourceMaterial
How?
Through the scope of the water-accounting pledge and the choice of where replenishment projects are located.
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) set a goal to be "water positive" by 2030, meaning it would return more water than it uses. SourceMaterial reported that a 2022 internal AWS memo discussed the water used to generate the electricity the data centres consume.

SourceMaterial published its report on the leaked memo on 25 October 2025. According to the report, the memo said that adding electricity-related water to the campaign would double its size and budget, and that the figure should be disclosed only if a regulator asked. The memo also said that half of the $109 million of water-replenishment projects would have been spent anyway.

Separately, SourceMaterial reported in April 2025 that 62 of the 632 data centres of Amazon, Microsoft and Google combined were in water-scarce regions, 38 of them operating and 24 planned.

In Aragón, Spain, a report of 25 March 2025 said AWS had asked to raise the water permits of three data centres by 48% per facility, from 36.4 to 53.9 million litres a year. A campaign against data centres in the region, called "No es sequía, es saqueo" ("It is not drought, it is plunder"), began in September 2025. In July 2026 an environmental approval for Amazon's largest data centre in Aragón, at Zaragoza, was reported to carry a water cap of 204,697 cubic metres a year, and the president of the Ebro basin authority said the water was not guaranteed all year.

In October 2026, a non-binding neighbourhood vote in Cuarte (Huesca) on a further AWS project, Walqa 2, was reported to have 99.1% of participants voting against. The sources reviewed do not give Amazon's public response to the memo report.

  1. 2022Internal AWS memo on the scope of the water-positive campaign, later leaked
  2. 2025AWS asks to raise water permits at three Aragón data centres by 48% per facility (reported March); SourceMaterial reports 62 of 632 big-tech data centres in water-scarce regions (April); campaign "No es sequía, es saqueo" begins (September); SourceMaterial reports on the leaked memo (25 October)
  3. 2026Environmental approval with a water cap for the Zaragoza campus reported (July); non-binding Cuarte vote against AWS Walqa 2 (October)

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Is there enough water in Aragón for the planned AWS data centres?
Company or project
Amazon Web Services

Asked to raise the water permits of three data centres by 48% per facility, from 36.4 to 53.9 million litres a year.

Ecoticias
Communities and civil society
Campaign "No es sequía, es saqueo"

Campaigned against data centres in Aragón under the name "It is not drought, it is plunder"; the campaign put data centres at 51.6% of the region's energy plan and AWS investment at 15.7 million euros per job.

elDiario.es
Government and regulators
President of the Ebro basin authority

Said water for the Zaragoza campus was not guaranteed all year; the campus was given a cap of 204,697 m³ a year.

Merca2

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

  • A pledge to be water positive by 2030: to return more water than the company uses

Recorded

  • A 2022 internal memo said that including the water used to generate electricity would double the campaign's size and budget, and that disclosure should happen only if a regulator asked, according to SourceMaterial's report.
  • The same memo said that half of the $109 million of offset projects would have been spent anyway, according to SourceMaterial.
  • AWS asked to raise the water permits of three Aragón data centres by 48% per facility, from 36.4 to 53.9 million litres a year.
  • An environmental approval for the Zaragoza AWS campus set a cap of 204,697 cubic metres of water a year; the president of the Ebro basin authority said water was not guaranteed all year.
  • Two Amazon facilities in Querétaro, Mexico, were reported to employ 17 people (secondary reports; the source URL is not in the material reviewed).

In court and with insurers

Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

Lawsuits and rulings

No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

Insurers

No insurer decision on record.

What nature saw

Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

Water-permit request, three Aragón facilities
36.4 to 53.9 million L/yr
Per facility, +48% (reported March 2025)
Water cap, Zaragoza campus
204,697 m³/yr
Reported July 2026; basin authority said supply not guaranteed all year
Big-tech data centres in water-scarce regions
62 of 632
Amazon, Microsoft and Google combined (SourceMaterial, April 2025)

What we don't know

Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

Nature

  • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.
  • Disputed Is there enough water in Aragón for the planned AWS data centres?

Court

Record

  • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: that AWS's pledge leaves power-plant water outside its scope, and that AWS replenished 4 of every 10 gallons used in 2023 through projects in Chile's Maipo basin and Cape Town (Gizmodo, citing Grist, September 2024; the item is marked unverified in the material reviewed).
  • None on record The reported claim that water used indirectly is about twelve times direct use is not tied to a named source in the material reviewed.
  • None on record The World Bank was reported to say that indirect water is at least 80% of the total used by data centres; the source link is not in the material reviewed.

Did the harm stop?

The sources reviewed do not report that any water use stopped; the pledge target year is 2030, and the Zaragoza campus was reported with a water cap in July 2026.

Who paid?

Not established in the sources reviewed. Groups in Aragón say the water competes with local use; no source quantifies the effect on local water users.

Sources

Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

Carbon and conservation finance

Offset
Using carbon credits to balance emissions released elsewhere, so that a buyer can claim lower or zero net emissions.