Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Law, regulation and treaties · Germany · 2009–2021

Vattenfall's nuclear exit claim against Germany ends in 2021 settlement

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 1 none on record · 1 not disclosed · 2 insufficient · 1 not measured See the gaps

Vattenfall's arbitration claim against Germany over the nuclear phase-out ended in a settlement in 2021. A separate claim over the Moorburg coal plant was settled in 2010 on confidential terms. The claims concern the cost of ending coal and nuclear power.

What?
Vattenfall's dispute with Germany over the nuclear phase-out ended in a settlement in 2021, as reported by Global Arbitration Review. Global Arbitration Review
When?
Nuclear claim settled in 2021; Dutch coal closure announced 20 December 2019 Global Arbitration Review
Who?
Gained
Lost
None on record
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Investment-treaty arbitration under the Energy Charter Treaty, ended by settlement Global Arbitration Review
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

Global Arbitration Review reported on the end of Vattenfall's dispute with Germany over the nuclear phase-out, which was settled in 2021.

Vattenfall announced on 20 December 2019 that its last coal power plant in the Netherlands was closing.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    1. 2012–2021Settled
      Vattenfall v. Germany (nuclear phase-out, Energy Charter Treaty)
      Energy Charter Treaty arbitration (forum not named in the sources reviewed) · Civil · Vattenfall → Federal Republic of Germany

      Settled in 2021. The settlement amount is reported in the sources but not verified. Global Arbitration Review

    2. 2009–2010Settled
      Vattenfall v. Germany (Moorburg coal plant cooling water, Energy Charter Treaty)
      Energy Charter Treaty arbitration (forum not named in the sources reviewed) · Civil · Vattenfall → Federal Republic of Germany

      Claim for 1.4 billion euro over limits on cooling-water withdrawal from the Elbe. Settled in August 2010 on confidential terms.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: Germany paid Vattenfall 1.425 billion euro under the nuclear settlement, and about 2.4 billion euro in total across operators.
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: the Dutch state paid Vattenfall 52.5 million euro for the early closure of the Dutch plant, according to an EU state-aid decision; the source could not be checked.
    • Not disclosed The Moorburg settlement terms and the amount Vattenfall received in the 2020 German coal closure auction are not disclosed in the sources reviewed.
    • None on record The forum of the arbitration cases is not named in the sources reviewed.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: ✓ Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Press and investigations

    1. Vattenfall saga end
      Global Arbitration Review ·

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.

    Law and courts

    Arbitration
    A private dispute process in which an appointed arbitrator, instead of a court, decides the case.