Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Finance, funds and markets · United States · 2013–2026

US syndicated conservation easement tax shelters (EcoVest, Fisher and Sinnott)

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 3 none on record · 4 insufficient · 1 not measured · 3 disputed · 2 unclear See the gaps

Investors in US partnerships bought land and donated conservation easements, claiming federal tax deductions that an IRS preliminary analysis put at an average of $9 per $1 invested. The IRS, a Senate investigation, courts and Congress acted over several years, and two promoters were convicted in 2023.

1.2%Share of a $180 million deduction claim that a court allowed (Hancock County, Mississippi, March 2026)
The court allowed about $2.18 million of $180 million claimed and applied a 40% penalty. Across the Tax Court cases the IRS described in May 2026, the average allowed was about 6%.

Status As of May 2026: the IRS reported more than 1,100 open cases and an investor settlement offer; the 2.5-times cap has applied since 29 December 2022; Fisher and Sinnott were convicted in September 2023 and the appeal outcome was not found.

What?
Syndicated conservation easement partnerships claimed federal tax deductions based on assumed development values of land they donated as easements. ProPublica
Where?
United States, including Georgia, South Carolina and Mississippi; criminal case in Atlanta. ProPublica
When?
Transactions from 2013; deductions claimed 2017 and 2018; cap enacted 29 December 2022; convictions September 2023; open cases May 2026.
Who?
Gained
  • EcoVest — Generated deductions of about $3 billion from 58 transactions in 2013-2018.
  • A related affiliate of the Atlantic Coast Conservancy — Paid $602,432 in 2015 to the director of the land trust, who also received a $156,750 salary from the foundation (ProPublica). ProPublica
  • The lobbying firm of former Representative Henry Waxman — Received $485,000 from organizers. ProPublica
Lost
  • US federal revenue — Deductions of $6.8 billion (2017) and $9.2 billion (2018) were claimed. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimated about $6.4 billion in revenue from the cap applied only to future transactions. ProPublica / Salon
  • Investors in the Mississippi case — About 1.2% of a $180 million claim allowed and a 40% penalty applied.
Harmed
None on record
Why?
US tax law allows a deduction for the development value lost by donating a conservation easement; the investors' deductions depended on the appraised development value.
How?
Organizers pooled investors in partnerships, bought land, obtained appraisals on assumed development scenarios, donated easements and passed the deductions to the investors. ProPublica
In proportion The Mississippi court allowed about $2.18 million of a $180 million deduction claim (about 1.2%).
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

Under US tax law a landowner who donates a conservation easement to a land trust can deduct the development value the land loses. In the syndicated version, an organizer pools investors in a partnership, which buys land; an appraiser values the land on an assumed development scenario; the easement is donated and the investors claim deductions. Deductions claimed through these transactions were $6.8 billion in 2017 and $9.2 billion in 2018 (the 2018 figure from IRS data).

In December 2017 ProPublica reported that a preliminary IRS analysis found an average of $9 in deductions for every $1 invested. It described a former golf course in South Carolina, bought for about $5.4 million, that was valued at more than $40 million on the assumption that 1,404 homes would be built, and said that Georgia taxpayers claimed about 36% of easement deductions while owning 2.5% of the land under easement. It also reported that the director of the land trust that accepted most of the transactions, Atlantic Coast Conservancy, received a salary of $156,750 from the foundation in 2015 and $602,432 from a related affiliate.

The IRS declared these transactions a listed transaction in December 2016 and put them on its list of worst tax scams in 2019; organizers lobbied Congress against IRS enforcement funding. A bipartisan Senate Finance Committee investigation led by Senators Grassley and Wyden characterised the structures in August 2020 as abusive tax shelters. On 29 December 2022 Congress limited partnership deductions to 2.5 times the investment through the SECURE 2.0 law. In 2022 the Tax Court set aside the IRS notice on procedural grounds, and the IRS reissued the rule in October 2024.

EcoVest, described as the largest organizer, generated deductions of about $3 billion from 58 transactions between 2013 and 2018; one appraiser valued 51 of them. In the criminal case, Jack Fisher, a former IRS employee, and James Sinnott were convicted in September 2023 over more than $1.3 billion in false deductions and sentenced to 25 and 23 years in prison.

In March 2026 a court in a Mississippi case concerning a 236-acre property allowed about $2.18 million of a $180 million deduction claimed on a sand-mine income model, and applied a 40% penalty. In May 2026 the IRS said more than 1,100 cases were open and that the Tax Court had allowed an average of about 6% of the deductions claimed. It offered investors a settlement under which they pay a penalty of 10 to 20% and deduct the money they invested.

  1. 2013EcoVest begins the 2013-2018 run of 58 transactions generating about $3 billion in deductions
  2. 2016December: IRS declares syndicated conservation easements a listed transaction
  3. 2017ProPublica reports the average of $9 in deductions per $1 invested (December). Deductions claimed: $6.8 billion
  4. 2018Deductions claimed: $9.2 billion, by 16,900 people
  5. 2019IRS places the transactions on its list of worst tax scams
  6. 2020August: bipartisan Senate Finance Committee investigation characterises the structures as abusive tax shelters
  7. 2022Tax Court sets aside the IRS notice on procedural grounds. 29 December: SECURE 2.0 caps partnership deductions at 2.5 times the investment
  8. 2023September: Fisher and Sinnott convicted in the criminal case
  9. 2024October: IRS reissues the notice
  10. 2026March: Mississippi court allows about 1.2% of a $180 million claim. May: IRS reports more than 1,100 open cases and offers an investor settlement

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

What were the donated easements worth?
Press and investigations
ProPublica

An IRS preliminary analysis found an average of $9 in deductions per $1 invested; a golf course bought for about $5.4 million was valued at more than $40 million.

ProPublica
Government and regulators
Senate Finance Committee

An email cited in its investigation showed land bought for under $3 million valued at $81 million.

Company or project
Investors in the Mississippi case

Claimed a $180 million deduction based on a sand-mine income model for a 236-acre property.

Courts
Mississippi court (March 2026)

Allowed about $2.18 million, about 1.2%, and applied a 40% penalty.

Was the IRS notice on these transactions valid?
Government and regulators
IRS

Declared the transactions listed transactions in December 2016 and reissued the notice in October 2024.

Courts
Tax Court

Set the notice aside in 2022 on procedural grounds.

Should IRS enforcement against the transactions be curbed?
Company or project
Syndicated easement organizers

Campaigned in Congress to cut the IRS enforcement budget.

ProPublica
Government and regulators
Senate Finance Committee

Its bipartisan investigation of August 2020 characterised the structures as abusive tax shelters.

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

  • The donation of an easement permanently closing private land to development, the purpose for which US tax law allows the deduction.
    Description of the deduction's purpose in the sources reviewed

Recorded

  • A preliminary IRS analysis found an average of $9 in deductions for every $1 invested; a South Carolina golf course bought for about $5.4 million was valued at more than $40 million on an assumed 1,404 homes.
  • Georgia taxpayers claimed about 36% of easement deductions while owning about 2.5% of the land under easement.
  • Easement deductions claimed were $6.8 billion in 2017 and $9.2 billion in 2018; 16,900 people claimed the 2018 deductions.
  • An email cited in the Senate investigation showed land bought for under $3 million valued at $81 million.
  • The sector spent about $11 million on lobbying from 2017, of which the Partnership for Conservation spent $6 million and EcoVest $3.3 million; the lobbying firm of former Representative Henry Waxman received $485,000 from organizers.
  • The 2.5-times cap applies only to future transactions; the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated revenue of about $6.4 billion to 2031, against $12.5 billion if it had been retroactive.
  • A Mississippi court allowed about $2.18 million (1.2%) of a $180 million deduction on a 236-acre (about 95 ha) property and applied a 40% penalty; investors had raised $23.4 million.
  • Fisher and Sinnott were convicted in September 2023 over more than $1.3 billion in false deductions and sentenced to 25 and 23 years.

Who gained

Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

Reached nature or the ground

Not published
No figure published.

Gained elsewhere

Not totalled
Currency: USD · Window: 2013-2026. All figures cover the same period. * Estimate built from cited figures.

Responses on record

  • Internal Revenue Service (2016-2026): Declared syndicated conservation easements a listed transaction (December 2016) and listed them among the worst tax scams (2019); reissued the notice in October 2024 after the Tax Court set it aside on procedural grounds; in May 2026 offered investors a settlement with a 10-20% penalty.
  • Syndicated easement organizers (2016-2022): Campaigned in Congress to cut the IRS enforcement budget; the sector spent about $11 million on lobbying from 2017. · ProPublica

In court and with insurers

Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

Lawsuits and rulings

  1. 2023-09 (convictions)Claimant won
    United States v Fisher and Sinnott (syndicated conservation easement fraud)
    US federal court, Atlanta · Criminal · United States → Jack Fisher; James Sinnott

    A former IRS employee and a co-defendant were convicted in September 2023 over more than $1.3 billion in false deductions and sentenced to 25 and 23 years in prison. The outcome of their appeal was not found.

  2. 2026-03Outcome not on record$180000bn Deduction claimed; about $2.18 million (1.2%) allowed, 40% penalty applied
    Hancock County, Mississippi, conservation easement deduction case
    Court not named in the record · Civil · Investors in the partnership (not named in the record) → Not named in the record

    On a 236-acre (about 95 ha) property the claim rested on a sand-mine income model. The court allowed about $2.18 million of $180 million and applied a 40% penalty; investors had raised $23.4 million.

  3. 2022Claimant won
    Tax Court challenge to the IRS notice on syndicated conservation easements
    US Tax Court · Administrative · Taxpayers (not named in the record) → Internal Revenue Service

    The Tax Court set aside the IRS notice on procedural grounds in 2022; the IRS reissued the rule in October 2024.

Insurers

No insurer decision on record.

What nature saw

Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

Basis of valuation
Assumed development
Valuations rested on hypothetical building scenarios, for example 1,404 homes on a former golf course in South Carolina (ProPublica, 2017)
Share of a deduction claim allowed
1.2%
Mississippi, March 2026: about $2.18 million of $180 million
Average allowed by the Tax Court
About 6%
IRS, May 2026, across more than 1,100 open cases

What we don't know

Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

Nature

  • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

Court

  • Unclear Hancock County, Mississippi, conservation easement deduction case: outcome not on record.

Accounts

  • Disputed What were the donated easements worth?
  • Disputed Was the IRS notice on these transactions valid?
  • Disputed Should IRS enforcement against the transactions be curbed?

Record

  • None on record How much of the restitution ordered against Fisher and Sinnott has been collected is not known, and the outcome of their appeal was not found.
  • None on record No monetary fine against EcoVest is recorded.
  • Unclear The outcomes of the pending US conservation-easement cases were not found.
  • None on record The Joint Committee on Taxation's official table could not be opened; the revenue figures come from ProPublica.
  • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: EcoVest accepted a court injunction in March 2023 without admitting wrongdoing.
  • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: restitution of about $458 million for Fisher and $444 million for Sinnott.
  • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: Fisher earned about $60 million from 15 transactions.
  • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: only 34 appraisers valued 296 transactions.

Did the harm stop?

The 2.5-times cap enacted on 29 December 2022 applies only to future transactions, and the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated about $6.4 billion in revenue to 2031 against $12.5 billion had it been retroactive.

Who paid?

US federal revenue: deductions of $6.8 billion (2017) and $9.2 billion (2018) were claimed. The Tax Court has allowed about 6% of claimed deductions on average, according to the IRS (May 2026).

Sources

Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

Places and local terms

Conservancy (Kenya)
In Kenya, land managed by a community or private owners for wildlife alongside grazing, often with outside partners.

Science and environment

Hectare (ha)
A unit of area equal to 10,000 square metres, about 2.5 acres. 100 hectares make one square kilometre.