Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Mining / tailings dam · Brazil · 2015–2024

Renova Foundation (Mariana dam, Brazil)

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
People
  • 19 people died.
    No primary source was identified in the sources reviewed.
What the record lacks: 2 none on record · 1 not measured · 2 disputed · 2 unclear See the gaps

After the 2015 collapse of the Mariana tailings dam, a foundation funded by the mining companies ran the repair programmes for nine years. In October 2024 it was closed and replaced by a R$170 billion agreement, of which R$38 billion had already been spent.

R$170bn / R$100bnHeadline settlement vs new money, October 2024 (100% basis)
R$170bn in total, of which R$38bn had already been spent through Renova to September 2024, R$100bn is new money to public authorities and communities over 20 years, and about R$32bn is Samarco performance obligations.

Status As of August 2025: the R$170bn agreement of October 2024 replaced the Renova Foundation; a federal court released the R$1.3bn insurance-bond requirement on 6 August 2025; completion of the dissolution was not confirmed.

What?
A foundation set up and funded by the mining companies after the Mariana dam collapse carried out the repair programmes, was questioned over its independence, and was closed in 2024 when a R$170bn agreement replaced it. Vale S.A. / SEC EDGAR
Where?
Mariana, Minas Gerais, and the Doce River, Brazil; related claim in England.
When?
Dam collapse in 2015; Renova active until the agreement of 25 October 2024; payments under the agreement run to 2043. Diário do Comércio
Who?
Gained
  • BHP and Vale — Booked their insurance receipts as other income or equity results; no source found says the proceeds went to Renova, the settlement or restoration.
Lost
None on record
Harmed
  • People killed and affected by the collapse — 19 deaths recorded; damage along the Doce River; rebuilding of affected communities unfinished as of December 2023. Exame
Why?
The reasons for creating Renova as a company-funded foundation not on record; the prosecutor’s office asked for its closure in December 2023 because it was not autonomous. Exame
How?
Samarco funded Renova with Vale and BHP Brasil as secondary funders at 50% each; the 2024 agreement combines R$38bn already spent, R$100bn over 20 years and about R$32bn of Samarco obligations. Vale S.A. / SEC EDGAR
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

The Mariana dam in Brazil collapsed in 2015. The research record lists 19 deaths and damage along the Doce River. The operator was Samarco, linked in the record to Vale and BHP.

The Renova Foundation was created after the collapse to carry out repair programmes. The record describes it as set up by BHP and Vale and funded by Samarco, with Vale and BHP Brasil as secondary funders at 50% each. In its fiscal year 2021 BHP agreed to provide up to US$725 million for Renova programmes plus US$40 million of working capital. R$1.3 billion of insurance bonds, which are guarantees and not payouts, secured Renova's obligations. In 2017 an independent science panel was formed at Renova's request; it was chaired by Yolanda Kakabadse, a former president of IUCN and of WWF International.

Renova's independence from the companies was questioned. According to Agência Pública (September 2018), about 20% of Renova's staff came from the companies that financed it, and a prosecutor assessed the companies and the foundation as in practice the same. In December 2023 the Minas Gerais state prosecutor’s office (MPMG) asked for Renova to be closed on the ground that it was not autonomous from the mining companies; the rebuilding of affected communities was not finished, Exame reported.

On 25 October 2024 an agreement was signed with a total of R$170 billion (about US$31.7 billion) on a 100% basis. It comprises R$38 billion already spent through Renova, R$100 billion to public authorities and communities over 20 years, indexed to the IPCA inflation index, and about R$32 billion of Samarco performance obligations. The agreement extinguished Renova; Samarco was to take over its programmes over a 12-month transition. The signing came nine years after the collapse. The research record states that where the R$38 billion went is unclear, and reports that President Lula said no one knows.

In 2025 BHP was found liable in England, according to the research record. Individual criminal proceedings in Brazil are recorded as ending in acquittal. On 6 August 2025 a federal court released the requirement for the R$1.3 billion of insurance bonds.

  1. 2015Mariana dam collapses (19 deaths recorded)
  2. 2017Independent science panel formed at Renova’s request, chaired by Yolanda Kakabadse
  3. 2018Agência Pública reports about 20% of Renova staff came from financier companies (September)
  4. 2021BHP agrees up to US$725m for Renova programmes plus US$40m working capital (fiscal year 2021)
  5. 2023Minas Gerais prosecutors ask for Renova to be closed (December)
  6. 2024R$38bn spent through Renova to September; R$170bn agreement signed 25 October; Renova extinguished
  7. 2025BHP found liable in England; federal court releases the R$1.3bn insurance-bond requirement (6 August)

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Was the Renova Foundation independent of the companies that funded it?
Press and investigations
Agência Pública

About 20% of Renova’s staff came from the companies that financed it (September 2018).

Government and regulators
A prosecutor, as reported in the sources reviewed

Assessed the companies and the foundation as in practice the same.

Government and regulators
Minas Gerais prosecutor’s office (MPMG)

Asked in December 2023 for Renova to be closed because it was not autonomous from the mining companies; rebuilding of affected communities was unfinished.

Exame
What does the R$170bn headline represent, and where did the R$38bn go?
Company or project
Renova (company-reported figure)

R$38bn spent through Renova to September 2024.

Company or project
Vale (SEC filing)

R$170bn comprises R$38bn already spent, R$100bn to public authorities and communities over 20 years, and about R$32bn of Samarco performance obligations.

Vale S.A. / SEC EDGAR
Press and investigations
Diário do Comércio

The agreement totals R$170bn, of which R$100bn is new money payable until 2043; Renova’s R$38bn is questioned.

Diário do Comércio
Government and regulators
President Lula, as reported in the sources reviewed

No one knows where the R$38bn went.

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

  • An “independent repair foundation”, Fundação Renova.
    How the foundation was presented publicly, as reported in the sources reviewed

Recorded

  • About 20% of Renova’s staff came from financier companies (Agência Pública, September 2018).
  • The Minas Gerais prosecutor’s office asked in December 2023 for Renova to be closed because it was not autonomous from the mining companies.
  • The October 2024 agreement totals R$170bn: R$38bn already spent, R$100bn over 20 years, about R$32bn Samarco obligations.
  • R$100bn of the total is new money, payable until 2043.

Who gained

Money that reached nature, beside money that stayed elsewhere.

Reached nature or the ground

Not published
No figure published.

Gained elsewhere

Not totalled
Currency: BRL · Window: 2015–2043. All figures cover the same period. * Estimate built from cited figures.

Responses on record

  • Vale: In its SEC filing Vale described the 25 October 2024 settlement as R$170bn (about US$31.7bn) on a 100% basis, comprising R$38bn already spent, R$100bn over 20 years and about R$32bn of Samarco obligations. · Vale S.A. / SEC EDGAR
  • BHP (FY2021): In fiscal year 2021 BHP agreed to provide up to US$725m for Renova programmes plus US$40m of working capital.

In court and with insurers

Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

Lawsuits and rulings

  1. 2024-10-25SettledBRL 170000000bn Total agreement, 100% basis (about US$31.7bn)
    Settlement agreement for the Mariana dam collapse
    Brazil (public authorities and the companies) · Civil · Public authorities → Samarco, Vale and BHP

    R$38bn already spent, R$100bn over 20 years to public authorities and communities, about R$32bn of Samarco performance obligations. The agreement extinguished the Renova Foundation. Vale S.A. / SEC EDGAR

  2. 2025Claimant won
    Claim against BHP in England over the Mariana collapse
    England (court not specified in the sources reviewed) · Civil · Claimants (number not on record) → BHP

    BHP was found liable in England in 2025, according to the research record.

  3. Defendant won
    Criminal proceedings over the Mariana collapse
    Brazil · Criminal · Prosecution → Individuals (not named in the sources reviewed)

    Individual criminal liability is recorded as ending in acquittal.

Insurers

  1. 2025No policy found
    Not named in the sources reviewed → Samarco (Renova obligations)

    R$1.3bn of insurance bonds secured Renova obligations; they are guarantees, not payouts. A federal court released the requirement on 6 August 2025.

  2. Paid
    Not named in the sources reviewed → BHP and Vale

    BHP and Vale booked their insurance receipts as other income or equity results. No source found says the proceeds went to Renova, the settlement or restoration.

What nature saw

Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

Spent through Renova
R$38bn
To September 2024; figure reported by the company. Where it went is described as unclear.
New money under the 2024 agreement
R$100bn
To public authorities and communities, over 20 years, indexed to the IPCA
Deaths
19
No primary source was identified in the sources reviewed

What we don't know

Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

Nature

  • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

Insurers

  • Unclear Not named in the sources reviewed: no decision on record.

Accounts

  • Disputed Was the Renova Foundation independent of the companies that funded it?
  • Disputed What does the R$170bn headline represent, and where did the R$38bn go?

Record

  • Unclear Where the R$38bn spent through Renova went: the research record describes this as unclear.
  • None on record No source found says insurance proceeds went to Renova, the settlement or restoration.
  • None on record Completion of the dissolution of Renova was not confirmed.

Did the harm stop?

The Renova Foundation was closed under the October 2024 agreement, nine years after the collapse, and Samarco was to take over its programmes over a 12-month transition. In December 2023 the rebuilding of affected communities was reported as not finished.

Who paid?

Samarco funded Renova, with Vale and BHP Brasil as secondary funders at 50% each. Under the 2024 agreement R$100bn is payable to public authorities and communities over 20 years, and about R$32bn is Samarco performance obligations.

Sources

Voices on record: ✓ Company or project✓ Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

Press and investigations

  1. Acordo Mariana assinado prevê 170 bi reparação
    Diário do Comércio · 2024-10-25

Connected cases

Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.

Places and local terms

Renova Foundation
The foundation set up after the 2015 Mariana dam collapse to carry out repairs and compensation on behalf of Samarco and its owners.

Science and environment

Tailings and tailings dam
Tailings are the waste left after ore is processed; a tailings dam is the embankment that stores them as wet sludge.

Institutions

IUCN Red List
The International Union for Conservation of Nature and its global list assessing species' risk of extinction.
SEC
The US Securities and Exchange Commission, which regulates securities markets and what companies tell investors.