Onagawa and Fukushima Daiichi site elevation decisions
- The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
Two Japanese nuclear plants on the Tohoku coast were built at different heights above sea level in the 1960s and 1970s. When the 2011 tsunami arrived, the heights set decades earlier had different consequences at each site.
Figures as stated in the sources reviewed; other publications give slightly different numbers.
Status The sources reviewed give no development after the 2011 tsunami; no ruling or official finding on the site-height decisions is on record in them.
- TEPCO — Lower running costs for the seawater cooling pumps, lower construction costs and easier transport of equipment, as the reasons given for Daiichi.
What happened
The Fukushima Daiichi site was a natural bluff about 35 m above sea level. In 1967 TEPCO removed about 25 m of it, which put the reactor buildings at about 10 m. The reasons given were lower running costs for the seawater cooling pumps, reaching solid bedrock, which helps against earthquakes, and easier transport of equipment with lower construction costs. TEPCO engineer Hiroshi Kaburaki wrote in January 1969 that the decision compared construction costs with the operating costs of the circulation water pumps.
At Onagawa, run by Tohoku Electric, the site height was set at 14.8 m above sea level, with the first floors of the main buildings and key outdoor structures at 15.0 m. Press accounts credit Yanosuke Hirai (1902–1986), Tohoku Electric's vice president from 1960 to 1975, as the one member of the planning committee who argued for 14.8 m while colleagues thought about 12 m was enough. According to those accounts he cited the 869 Jogan tsunami and argued for an intake design that kept cooling water available when the sea drew back. Tohoku Electric's own 2024 paper credits an in-house committee of experts and does not name Hirai.
The committee for the Onagawa site height was formed in 1968 and the decision was made in the late 1960s; no exact date has been published. Construction started in 1980, and Unit 1, a 524 MW boiling water reactor, entered commercial operation in June 1984. Tohoku Electric says the tsunami assumed at the time was only about 3 m.
The 2011 tsunami was about 13 m at the Onagawa plant, according to Tohoku Electric and the Japan Atomic Industrial Forum (JAIF). The earthquake also lowered the land by about 1 m, bringing the Onagawa site to about 13.8 m, so the remaining margin was under 1 m. Other publications give different figures: The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists gives 14.3 m at Onagawa and 13.1 m at Daiichi, and Wikipedia gives 15 m at Onagawa fishing port, which is the town and not the plant.
- 1967TEPCO removes about 25 m of a bluff about 35 m high at Fukushima Daiichi; reactor buildings at about 10 m
- 1968Tohoku Electric forms the committee on the Onagawa site height
- 1969TEPCO engineer Hiroshi Kaburaki writes that the decision compared construction costs with pump operating costs (January)
- 1980Onagawa construction starts
- 1984Onagawa Unit 1 enters commercial operation (June)
- 2011Tsunami about 13 m at Onagawa; land lowered by about 1 m, leaving a margin of under 1 m
What was said
Where accounts differ
Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.
Credit Yanosuke Hirai, Tohoku Electric's vice president, as the lone voice for 14.8 m while colleagues thought about 12 m was enough.
Its 2024 paper credits an in-house committee of experts, without naming Hirai.
Tohoku ElectricWrote that the decision compared construction costs with the operating costs of the circulation water pumps.
The reasons given were also reaching solid bedrock, which helps against earthquakes, and easier transport of equipment with lower construction costs; pumping cost was not the sole reason.
How it looked
Shown
- Tohoku Electric's 2024 paper attributes the Onagawa site height to an in-house committee of experts, without naming Hirai.Tohoku Electric · Tohoku Electric
Recorded
- Fukushima Daiichi: bluff of about 35 m reduced by about 25 m in 1967, putting the reactor buildings at about 10 m.
- Onagawa: site height 14.8 m above sea level; first floors of the main buildings and key outdoor structures at 15.0 m.
- The earthquake lowered the Onagawa land by about 1 m, to about 13.8 m; the tsunami at the plant was about 13 m.
Who gained
Reached nature or the ground
Gained elsewhere
Responses on record
- tohoku-electric (2024): Its 2024 paper credits an in-house committee of experts for the Onagawa site height and says the tsunami assumed at the time was only about 3 m. · Tohoku Electric
In court and with insurers
Lawsuits and rulings
Insurers
What nature saw
Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.
What we don't know
Nature
- Not measured Harm to nature: No independent ecological evaluation is on record.
Court
- None on record No court case on record.
Accounts
Record
- None on record No exact date for the Onagawa site-height decision has been published; the sources give the late 1960s.
- Disputed Accounts differ on who drove the 14.8 m decision: press accounts credit Yanosuke Hirai, while Tohoku Electric's 2024 paper credits an in-house committee of experts without naming him.
- Disputed Published tsunami and elevation figures differ between sources (13 m, 14.3 m or 15 m at Onagawa; 13.1 m at Daiichi), and some articles describe the 14.8 m as a seawall or breakwater, or as 14.7 m.
Did the harm stop?
Not applicable; the record covers siting decisions made between 1967 and the late 1960s and their effect in 2011.
Who paid?
The sources reviewed do not say.
Sources
Company or project
- Tohoku Electric paper, PSAM17 & ASRAM2024Tohoku Electric · 2024
Press and investigations
- Onagawa: the Japanese nuclear power plant that didn't melt down on 3/11Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists · 2014-03
- Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power PlantWikipedia ·
Communities and civil society
- Subsidence at the Onagawa and Fukushima sitesCNIC (Citizens' Nuclear Information Center) ·
Connected cases
- Fukushima nuclear damage compensation financing (Japan) Japan · 2011–2025
- Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) (Company) — here: Operator of Fukushima Daiichi; there: Plant operator; recipient of NDF grants