Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Protected area / relocation · Tanzania · 1980–1997

Herders with residence papers forced out of Mkomazi reserve

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
What the record lacks: 2 none on record · 1 insufficient · 1 not measured See the gaps

In the 1980s and 1990s, herders with written residence rights were forced out of the Mkomazi reserve in Tanzania, and the dispute went to court, according to a 1997 IIED report. The sources reviewed do not give how many people were removed or the outcome of the case, so the scale of the loss is unknown.

What?
Herders with written residence rights were forcibly removed from the Mkomazi reserve in Tanzania in the 1980s and 1990s, and the case was taken to court, according to a 1997 IIED report. IIED
Where?
Mkomazi reserve, Tanzania IIED
When?
1980s to 1990s; report published January 1997 IIED
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
  • Herders with written residence rights — Residence on the reserve land ended IIED
Harmed
  • Herders with written residence rights — Forcibly removed from the reserve IIED
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Forced removal of herders from the reserve; the dispute was taken to court. IIED
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

Herders with written proof of residence rights were forcibly removed from the Mkomazi reserve, and a case was brought to court, according to a 1997 IIED report.

Brockington's 2002 book Fortress Conservation draws on this case, according to the sources reviewed.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • None on record Not stated in the sources reviewed: the number of people removed; the 1997 report gives no figure.
    • None on record Not stated in the sources reviewed: the outcome of the court case over the removals.
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: about 250 eviction reports across 184 protected areas worldwide, with under-reporting likely (Brockington and Igoe, 2006).

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts— Press and investigations✓ Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Places and local terms

    Pastoralists
    People whose livelihoods depend on moving livestock between grazing lands.