Australia penalises Mercer Super and Vanguard over sustainable and ethical fund claims
Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.
- The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
Mercer Super's 'Sustainable Plus' fund held coal and mining companies, and 74% of Vanguard's 'ethical' fund was not screened, the sources say. The penalties were AUD 11.3 million and AUD 12.9 million, both in 2024, and the cases test whether sustainability labels matched what funds held.
- Coal and mining companies held in the Mercer Super fund — were among the holdings of the fund labelled sustainable ASIC
What happened
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said Mercer Super's 'Sustainable Plus' fund held coal and mining companies, and described the case as its first greenwashing case (ASIC, 2024).
A penalty of AUD 11.3 million was imposed on Mercer Super in 2024 (ASIC, 2024).
The Lawyer Magazine reported a AUD 12.9 million penalty against Vanguard Australia in 2024, after the court found that 74% of its 'ethical' fund had not been screened.
In court and with insurers
Lawsuits and rulings
- 2024Outcome not on recordASIC greenwashing penalty against Mercer SuperFederal Court of Australia · Civil · Australian Securities and Investments Commission → Mercer Super
Federal Court penalty of AUD 11.3 million over the 'Sustainable Plus' fund. The sources do not give the grounds in full. ASIC
- 2024Outcome not on recordPenalty against Vanguard Australia over 'ethical' fundFederal Court of Australia · Civil · → Vanguard Australia
Federal Court penalty of AUD 12.9 million; the court found 74% of the 'ethical' fund had not been screened. The Lawyer Magazine
Insurers
What we don't know
Nature
- Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.
Court
Record
- Insufficient Reported but not verified: a 2024 Super Review report of the Mercer penalty.
- None on record Not stated in the sources reviewed: whether either penalty was appealed or paid.
- None on record Not stated in the sources reviewed: who received any gains from the holdings, or whether fund members lost money.
- None on record Not stated in the sources reviewed: the claimant in the Vanguard case.
Did the harm stop?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Who paid?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Sources
Press and investigations
- Greenwashing action leads to $12.9m fine dubbed as the highest yetThe Lawyer Magazine · 2024
Connected cases
- Mercer fined A$11.3m over 'sustainable' fund; Vanguard and Active Super also penalised Australia · 2024–2025
- Mercer Super (Company) — here: defendant; AUD 11.3 million penalty; there: Penalised over the 'Sustainable Plus' fund
- Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Government) — here: regulator; there: Regulator that brought the Mercer case