Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Water use · Indonesia · 1998–2023

Jakarta's private water concessions and the groundwater wells that filled the gap

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
What the record lacks: 1 none on record · 1 insufficient · 1 not measured See the gaps

Jakarta's piped water ran through two private concessions, Palyja and Aetra, from 1998 to 2023, while households without a network drilled wells. The Supreme Court annulled the privatisation in 2017, and PAM Jaya restructured contracts to avoid compensation of 6.7 trillion rupiah.

What?
Jakarta's piped water network was run by two private concessions, Palyja and Aetra, from 1998 to 2023, and households without a network drilled wells. The Jakarta Post
Where?
Jakarta, Indonesia, including the Muara Angke coast The Jakarta Post
When?
Concessions 1998 to 2023; Supreme Court ruling 2017; overturn 2018; cooperation ended 2023 Bisnis.com
Who?
Gained
  • Palyja and Aetra — Ran the piped network under concession contracts and kept them until the end of the term, according to the sources The Jakarta Post
Lost
None on record
Harmed
  • Residents of Muara Angke, north Jakarta — A fishing family buys 8 drums of water a day for 20,000 rupiah, and says it has nowhere else to go
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Private concessions ran the network; after the court ruling, PAM Jaya restructured the operator contracts The Jakarta Post
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

The Jakarta Post reported that the Supreme Court annulled the privatisation of Jakarta's water in 2017, and that PAM Jaya restructured the contracts rather than face compensation of 6.7 trillion rupiah.

Piped water reached 44.5% of residents in 1998 and 59.4% in 2019 under two private concessions, Palyja and Aetra, which ran the network for about 25 years.

Bisnis.com reported in January 2023 that cooperation with the private operators had ended and that PAM Jaya was preparing to run the service fully.

Experts quoted in the sources say well bans cannot be enforced without a piped supply, and households without a network moved to wells.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    1. 2017Overturned on appeal
      Jakarta water privatisation case (Supreme Court)
      Supreme Court of Indonesia · Civil · Not stated in the sources reviewed → Not stated in the sources reviewed

      The Supreme Court annulled the water privatisation in 2017, according to the Jakarta Post. The sources reviewed say the ruling was overturned on procedural grounds in 2018. The Jakarta Post

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: land subsidence of up to 26 cm a year in 1991 to 1997, about 11 cm a year in North Jakarta in 2014 to 2018, and 12 cm in 2025.
    • None on record Not found: any personal penalty for officials; the sources say no data is available.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.

    Science and environment

    Groundwater
    Water held underground in soil and rock, drawn through wells.