Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Mining · India · date not stated

Village council decisions on Hasdeo coal mine reported irregular

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 3 none on record · 1 not measured See the gaps

Sanctuary Nature Foundation reported that village council decisions on the Hasdeo coal mine were irregular. The sources reviewed do not measure the forest affected by the mine, so the stake for nature is not quantified.

What?
Village council decisions on the Hasdeo coal mine were reported as irregular. Sanctuary Nature Foundation
Where?
Hasdeo Aranya area, India. Sanctuary Nature Foundation
When?
Reported after 2024; exact dates not stated. Sanctuary Nature Foundation
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
None on record
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Coal mining decisions taken through village councils, reported as irregular. Sanctuary Nature Foundation
5 of 6 questions answered from the record · open: who

What happened

The record, in order.

Sanctuary Nature Foundation reported that village council decisions on the Hasdeo coal mine were irregular.

The foundation's article discusses the costs of coal in Hasdeo Aranya.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • None on record The sources reviewed do not name the village councils, the decisions or the mining company.
    • None on record The area of forest affected and the status of the mine are not stated in the sources reviewed.
    • None on record Who gained from the mine, and who was harmed, is not named in the sources reviewed.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts— Press and investigations✓ Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Communities and civil society

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.