Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Mining · South Africa · 2015–2016

Eskom advances tied to Tegeta coal mine purchase, South African inquiry finds

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
What the record lacks: 2 none on record · 1 insufficient · 1 not measured See the gaps

A South African commission found that Eskom advances were tied to the sale of the Optimum coal mine to Tegeta, a company linked to a business family. At stake are public funds, which the case file says were paid by Eskom and borne by taxpayers.

What?
The Zondo commission described the purchase of the Optimum coal mine by Tegeta, backed by Eskom advances, as sham. Mail & Guardian
Where?
South Africa; the Optimum coal mine
When?
Mines minister's trip to Zurich in December 2015; Eskom advances in 2015 and 2016; amaBhungane report dated October 2016. amaBhungane / Daily Maverick
Who?
Gained
  • Tegeta — Bought the Optimum coal mine from Glencore after the minister's pressure, and received Eskom advance payments amaBhungane / Daily Maverick
  • Owners of Tegeta — Gained from the purchase; their family later left South Africa, per the case file
Lost
Harmed
  • Taxpayers, who pay Eskom's bill — Carry the cost of the advances, per the case file
Why?
The commission said the advance related to financial support for the buyer rather than to coal supply.
How?
The minister pressed Glencore to sell the Optimum mine to Tegeta; banks refused credit and Eskom made coal advances of 1.68 billion rand plus 659 million rand. amaBhungane / Daily Maverick
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

In December 2015 the mines minister, Mosebenzi Zwane, travelled to Zurich and pressed Glencore to sell the Optimum coal mine to Tegeta, which the Zondo Commission recorded as arm-twisting.

Banks refused credit, and amaBhungane reported in October 2016 that most of one Eskom advance, R587m, was approved within six hours.

The Zondo Commission described the purchase of the mine, backed by the Eskom advance, as sham.

The commission found the advance related to financial support for Tegeta rather than to coal supply, and recommended criminal charges against former Eskom executives.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: a 2026 report that the Optimum mine came back from a rescue process; the sources reviewed do not confirm it.
    • None on record The sources do not say whether criminal charges followed the commission's recommendation.
    • None on record The sources do not say whether the advances were repaid.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers

    Press and investigations

    1. R587m in six hours: how Eskom paid for a coal mine
      amaBhungane / Daily Maverick · 2016-10-20

    Connected cases

    Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.