Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Plastic waste and recycling claims · China · 2018–2020

China National Sword plastic import ban and container returns

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 1 none on record · 1 not disclosed · 1 not measured · 2 disputed See the gaps

China banned imports of most plastic waste from 1 January 2018. A 2018 study estimated the ban would displace 111 Mt of plastic waste by 2030, and later shipments ended up in other countries, some of which returned containers to the senders.

45%Share of cumulative global plastic-waste imports taken by China since 1992
About 106 Mt (Brooks, Wang & Jambeck, Science Advances, 2018).

Status As of the latest sources reviewed (Eurostat, October 2024): the EU exported 1.3 Mt of recyclable plastic outside the bloc in 2023.

What?
China's ban on plastic-waste imports (National Sword) displaced the trade to other countries, and several of them returned containers or shut illegal plants. Science Advances
Where?
China; displacement to Malaysia, the Philippines, Indonesia, Türkiye and other South-East Asian and transit countries. Interpol
When?
Ban in force from 1 January 2018; container returns in 2019–2020; Interpol report August 2020; Eurostat 2023 data. Science Advances
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
None on record
Harmed
None on record
Why?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
How?
Illegal shipments were rerouted to South-East Asia via transit countries (Interpol, August 2020). Interpol
5 of 6 questions answered from the record · open: who

What happened

The record, in order.

Brooks, Wang and Jambeck (Science Advances, 20 June 2018) reported that China took 45% of cumulative global plastic-waste imports since 1992, about 106 Mt. The study estimated that the import ban, in force from 1 January 2018, would displace 111 Mt by 2030.

Plastic-waste exports from the European Union continued: Eurostat recorded 1.3 Mt of recyclable plastic exported outside the EU in 2023 (CN code 3915). Recoup reported that more than 25% of England's 600,000-plus tonnes of plastic-waste exports went to Türkiye in 2023.

Several countries returned containers. On 31 May 2019 the Philippines sent 69 containers back to Canada, out of 103 shipped in 2013–14. On 20 January 2020 Malaysia returned 150 containers (3,737 t) to 13 countries, including France (43), the UK (42), the US (17), Canada (11) and Spain (10), and more than 200 illegal plants were shut.

Indonesia sent back dozens of containers in 2019; reported counts differ (49, 57 and 58). The Basel Action Network and Nexus3 found that only 12 of 58 US containers actually went back to the United States, with the rest going to India, Thailand, Vietnam and other countries.

In August 2020 Interpol published 'Emerging criminal trends in the global plastic waste market since January 2018', which reported that illegal shipments were rerouted to South-East Asia via transit countries.

  1. 2018China's plastic-waste import ban in force from 1 January; Brooks, Wang and Jambeck publish estimate (20 June)
  2. 2019Philippines sends 69 containers back to Canada (31 May); Indonesia returns containers
  3. 2020Malaysia returns 150 containers to 13 countries (20 January); Interpol report on plastic-waste crime (August)
  4. 2023EU exports 1.3 Mt of recyclable plastic outside the bloc (Eurostat); England sends more than 25% of its plastic-waste exports to Türkiye (Recoup)

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

How many containers did Indonesia send back, and where did they go?
Press and investigations
Reports of Indonesia's returns

Counts of 49, 57 and 58 containers were reported.

Mongabay
Communities and civil society
Basel Action Network and Nexus3

Found only 12 of 58 US containers actually went back to the US; the rest went to India, Thailand, Vietnam and others.

Mongabay

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

    Recorded

    • China took 45% of cumulative global plastic-waste imports since 1992 (about 106 Mt); the ban would displace an estimated 111 Mt by 2030
    • Malaysia returned 150 containers (3,737 t) to 13 countries and shut more than 200 illegal plants
    • Of 58 US containers Indonesia was reported to have returned, only 12 went back to the US (BAN and Nexus3)

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What nature saw

    Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

    Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

    Plastic waste displaced by the ban (estimate)
    111 Mt
    By 2030 (Brooks, Wang and Jambeck, 2018)
    Illegal plastic-waste plants shut in Malaysia
    more than 200
    As of 20 January 2020

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: No independent ecological evaluation is on record.

    Court

    Accounts

    • Disputed How many containers did Indonesia send back, and where did they go?

    Record

    • Disputed Container counts for Indonesia's 2019 returns conflict (49, 57 and 58).
    • Not disclosed Ocean-bound plastic certification fees are not published by Zero Plastic Oceans or Control Union, and Verra's fee schedule page (2 November 2022) showed no figures.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not on record: the Interpol report of August 2020 describes illegal shipments being rerouted to South-East Asia via transit countries.

    Who paid?

    Not on record in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project✓ Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations✓ Communities and civil society✓ Researchers✓ International bodies

    Government and regulators