Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Oil spill · Chile · 2010–2017

CIPER: over 23 billion pesos of Chile's drought tanker spending went to two firms

Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
What the record lacks: 2 none on record · 1 insufficient · 1 not measured See the gaps

CIPER reported that Chile spent 92 billion pesos on water tankers over seven years, and that more than 23 billion pesos went to companies linked to one businessman. The stake is water supply in a drought-hit region, where tanker contracts were awarded without tender.

What?
State spending on water tankers in Chile's Biobío region, with tanker contracts awarded directly to companies linked to one businessman. CIPER
Where?
Biobío Region, Chile CIPER
When?
2010 to May 2017 CIPER
Who?
Gained
  • Tierra de Chile — Co-owned with the businessman's wife and son; received direct tanker contracts CIPER
  • Second company linked to the same businessman (unnamed) — Received direct tanker contracts CIPER
Lost
  • Chile's state budget — Paid 92 billion pesos in tanker spending over seven years CIPER
Harmed
  • Drought-affected residents of the Biobío region — Depended on tanker deliveries; the sources give no outcome data
Why?
The stated justification was a drought emergency; the sources do not say why these companies received the contracts. CIPER
How?
Contracts awarded without tender by direct assignment; family ties and a political link to officials were documented. CIPER
6 of 6 questions answered from the record

What happened

The record, in order.

CIPER reported in July 2017 that the state spent 92 billion pesos on water tankers over seven years, and that more than 23 billion pesos went to companies linked to one businessman.

CIPER reported that every tanker contract in the Biobío region from 2010 to May 2017 was awarded directly to two companies linked to that businessman, who received about 25 percent of national tanker spending since at least 2010.

CIPER reported that one company was co-owned with the businessman's wife and son, and that the regional government's finance chief was the sister-in-law of a PPD deputy who wrote to the oversight board on the businessman's behalf.

    In court and with insurers

    Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

    Lawsuits and rulings

    No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

    Insurers

    No insurer decision on record.

    What we don't know

    Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

    Nature

    • Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.

    Record

    • None on record Not reported in the sources reviewed: any penalty for the individuals or companies involved.
    • None on record Not reported in the sources reviewed: profit margins on the tanker contracts.
    • Insufficient Reported but not verified: Infraestructura Pública reported that nearly 10 billion had been spent on tanker trucks by 2022; the title does not state the currency and the figure is not reconciled with the CIPER figures.

    Did the harm stop?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Who paid?

    Not stated in the sources reviewed.

    Sources

    Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers