Mercer fined A$11.3m over 'sustainable' fund; Vanguard and Active Super also penalised
Short record: the main facts, with sources. A full case file has not been prepared.
- The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
Australian regulators and courts penalised Mercer, Vanguard and Active Super over ESG fund claims, at A$10.5m to A$12.9m each. The sources reviewed also list US and German fines against DWS and Invesco.
What happened
ASIC said it won an A$11.3m penalty against Mercer Super over its 'Sustainable Plus' fund, which the sources reviewed say held coal and mining companies.
The Lawyer Magazine reported that the Federal Court in 2024 ordered Vanguard to pay A$12.9m over an 'ethical' fund in which about 74 percent of securities had not been screened.
The sources reviewed also list a A$10.5m penalty against Active Super, US fines of $19m (DWS) and $17.5m (Invesco), and a 25m euro German fine on DWS in 2025.
In court and with insurers
Lawsuits and rulings
- 2024-08Claimant wonASIC action against Mercer Super over 'Sustainable Plus' fundFederal Court of Australia · Civil · Australian Securities and Investments Commission → Mercer Super
The Federal Court ordered an A$11.3m penalty over ESG claims about the 'Sustainable Plus' fund, which the sources reviewed say held coal and mining companies. ASIC
- 2024Claimant wonAction over Vanguard 'ethical' fundFederal Court of Australia · Civil · Not stated in the sources reviewed → Vanguard
The Federal Court ordered a A$12.9m penalty over an 'ethical' fund in which about 74 percent of securities had not been screened. The Lawyer Magazine
Insurers
What we don't know
Nature
- Not measured Harm to nature: The record holds no measurement of harm to nature.
Record
- None on record The sources reviewed give no source link for the Active Super penalty, and no court is named for it.
- None on record The DWS and Invesco fines are listed without source links, and the sources reviewed give no dates beyond the ranges noted.
- None on record The sources reviewed do not say whether the penalties changed the holdings of the funds.
Did the harm stop?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Who paid?
Not stated in the sources reviewed.
Sources
Press and investigations
- Greenwashing action leads to $12.9m fine, dubbed as the highest yetThe Lawyer Magazine · 2024
Connected cases
- Australia penalises Mercer Super and Vanguard over sustainable and ethical fund claims Australia · 2024
- Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Government) — here: Regulator that brought the Mercer case; there: regulator
- Mercer Super (Company) — here: Penalised over the 'Sustainable Plus' fund; there: defendant; AUD 11.3 million penalty
- Deutsche Bank's DWS paid penalties in US and Germany over ESG claims Germany · 2023–2025
- DWS (Company) — here: Fined in the US and Germany; there: Asset manager penalised in the US and Germany
- Leonard Leo network and the anti-ESG campaign United States · 2020–2026
- Vanguard (Asset manager) — here: Penalised over the 'ethical' fund; there: Settled the coal antitrust suit for $29.5 million
- Texas anti-ESG law SB 13 and the states' suit against BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street United States · 2021–2026
- Vanguard (Asset manager) — here: Penalised over the 'ethical' fund; there: Defendant; settled for $29.5 million