Who gains from saving nature
Ledger 1 : 33 — For each dollar financing nature-based solutions in 2023, about $33 financed activities harmful to nature. (UNEP)
Cases / Plastic waste and recycling claims · International · 2015–2024

Adidas x Parley ocean plastic shoes

Nature's voice · report
No measurement of the harm done to me here is on record.
Did nature suffer? Not measured.
Not on record
  • The record does not name which of my species, waters, soils or forests were harmed.
What the record lacks: 4 none on record · 2 insufficient · 1 not measured · 2 disputed See the gaps

From 2015 to 2024 Adidas and Parley for the Oceans sold footwear made with material described as upcycled plastic waste intercepted before it reaches the ocean. A German report put the total at about 77 million pairs, and German television reported that part of the plastic did not come from Parley's own collections.

About 77 millionPairs reported as made with 'ocean plastic', 2015–2024
Reported by one German source and not independently confirmed; the final cumulative count rests on one source.

Status As of October 2026: the partnership ended at the end of 2024, and the cumulative pair count rests on one source.

What?
Adidas and Parley sold footwear made with material described as intercepted plastic waste; part of the plastic was reported not to have come from Parley's own collections. SGI Europe
Where?
Material described as collected from beaches and coastal communities; the sites are not named in the sources reviewed. SGI Europe
When?
2015 to the end of 2024. SGI Europe
Who?
Gained
None on record
Lost
None on record
Harmed
None on record
Why?
The partnership ended when the contract expired at the end of 2024; Adidas had told Parley in 2022. SGI Europe
How?
Plastic described as upcycled waste intercepted before reaching the ocean was used in footwear; pair counts were reported as 1 million (2017), 5 million (2018) and 11 million targeted (2019). Climate Action
5 of 6 questions answered from the record · open: who

What happened

The record, in order.

Adidas and Parley for the Oceans ran a partnership from 2015 to 2024 in which footwear was made with material the partners described as upcycled plastic waste intercepted from beaches and coastal communities before it reaches the ocean. Climate Action reported pairs made with ocean plastic of about 1 million in 2017 and 5 million in 2018, with 11 million targeted for 2019. By about 2021 the total was reported at more than 30 million pairs. One German report put the total over the ten years at about 77 million pairs.

In 2022 reporting, part of the plastic was reported not to have come from Parley's own collections, according to German television. The partnership ended when the contract expired at the end of 2024; Adidas had told Parley in 2022. ZDF and Flip were reported as having revealed this.

The term 'ocean-bound plastic' is used in a separate certification scheme launched in June 2020 by Zero Plastic Oceans with Control Union. Its categories are plastic collected within 50 km of the coast, along waterways (within 200 m of rivers), along the shoreline (within 200 m of the coast) and fishing material. The 50 km figure derives from a 2015 study by Jambeck, which did not use the term. The UK Food Standards Agency stated that there is no agreed definition of the term, and Changing Markets described it as a common greenwashing claim. Separately, Australia's competition regulator, the ACCC, fined Clorox A$8.25 million over 'ocean plastic' claims.

  1. 2015Adidas and Parley for the Oceans partnership begins
  2. 2017About 1 million pairs made with ocean plastic
  3. 2018About 5 million pairs
  4. 201911 million pairs targeted
  5. 2020Ocean-bound plastic certification by Zero Plastic Oceans and Control Union launched (June)
  6. 2021More than 30 million pairs reported by about this year
  7. 2022Adidas tells Parley the partnership will end; reporting that part of the plastic did not come from Parley's own collections
  8. 2024Partnership ends when the contract expires at the end of the year; about 77 million pairs reported over the ten years

What was said

Claims, in the words of those who made them.

“upcycled plastic waste intercepted from beaches and coastal communities before it reaches the ocean.”

Description of the material used in the Adidas–Parley products, as reported by SGI Europe · · SGI Europe

Where accounts differ

Each party's account, side by side, with its source. The record does not settle these points; it shows them.

Did the plastic come from beaches and coastal communities through Parley's own collections?
Company or project
Adidas and Parley (project description)

The material was described as upcycled plastic waste intercepted from beaches and coastal communities before it reaches the ocean.

SGI Europe
Press and investigations
German television (ZDF and Flip)

Reported that part of the plastic did not come from Parley's own collection work.

What counts as 'ocean' or 'ocean-bound' plastic?
Standard-setters and registries
Zero Plastic Oceans with Control Union

Certification categories: within 50 km of the coast, waterways (within 200 m of rivers), shoreline (within 200 m of the coast) and fishing material.

Control Union
Government and regulators
UK Food Standards Agency

There is no agreed definition of the term.

Communities and civil society
Changing Markets

Described the term as a common greenwashing claim.

How it looked

What was shown, beside what was recorded.

Shown

  • Footwear made with ocean plastic: about 1 million pairs in 2017 and 5 million in 2018, with 11 million targeted for 2019.
    Adidas, as reported by Climate Action · Climate Action

Recorded

  • The material was defined as upcycled plastic waste intercepted from beaches and coastal communities before it reaches the ocean.
  • More than 30 million pairs by about 2021.
  • About 77 million pairs over the ten years of the partnership, per one German report.
  • In 2022 reporting, part of the plastic did not come from Parley's own collections, per German television.
  • The partnership ended at the end of 2024 when the contract expired; Adidas told Parley in 2022; ZDF and Flip revealed this.
  • The ocean-bound plastic certification covers plastic collected up to 50 km from the coast; the UK Food Standards Agency says there is no agreed definition of the term.

In court and with insurers

Every proceeding and every insurer decision on record.

Lawsuits and rulings

No court case on record. No court has ruled on this case.

Insurers

No insurer decision on record.

What nature saw

Outcomes measured on the ground, and nature's note.

Nature's report opens this page. Below: further outcomes measured on the ground.

Pairs reported over ten years
About 77 million
One German report; the final count rests on one source
Plastic from Parley's own collections
Part was not
German television reporting, 2022; the share is not given in the sources reviewed
Agreed definition of 'ocean-bound plastic'
None
UK Food Standards Agency

What we don't know

Undisclosed, unproven, untried: recorded as data.

Nature

  • Not measured Harm to nature: No independent ecological evaluation is on record.

Court

Figures

  • Insufficient Pairs produced: Cumulative total over ten years per one German report; the final count rests on one source.

Accounts

  • Disputed Did the plastic come from beaches and coastal communities through Parley's own collections?
  • Disputed What counts as 'ocean' or 'ocean-bound' plastic?

Record

  • Insufficient Reported but not independently verified: the 2019 annual report is said to state 'over eleven million pairs'; this comes from an AI-extracted summary and was not verified in the PDF.
  • None on record The cumulative figure of about 77 million pairs rests on a single German report.
  • None on record No data on a price premium for the Parley products were found in the sources reviewed.
  • None on record The share of the plastic that did not come from Parley's own collections is not stated.

Did the harm stop?

The partnership ended at the end of 2024. The sources reviewed do not say whether the products were relabelled or withdrawn.

Who paid?

The sources reviewed give no price premium and no cost figure, so who paid for the 'ocean plastic' claim is not on record.

Sources

Voices on record: — Company or project— Government and regulators— Courts✓ Press and investigations— Communities and civil society— Researchers✓ Standard-setters and registries

Standard-setters and registries

Connected cases

Related matters, and cases linked to this one through the same organisations, with the role each played in both.

Insurance

Premium
The price paid for an insurance policy.

Carbon and conservation finance

Standard-setter and registry
An organisation that writes the rules for carbon credits, approves projects, and records when credits are issued and retired. Such bodies typically charge fees per credit.